Extreme storm impact and recovery on a natural beach-foredune system: The June 2016 storm at Bengello Beach, southeastern Australia.

Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures Pub Date : 2025-10-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cft.2025.10015
Thomas Oliver, Michael A Kinsela, Thomas B Doyle, Dylan McLaughlin, Roger F McLean
{"title":"Extreme storm impact and recovery on a natural beach-foredune system: The June 2016 storm at Bengello Beach, southeastern Australia.","authors":"Thomas Oliver, Michael A Kinsela, Thomas B Doyle, Dylan McLaughlin, Roger F McLean","doi":"10.1017/cft.2025.10015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The June 2016 extratropical cyclone with anomalous ENE storm wave direction caused widespread beach-foredune erosion in southeastern Australia. At Bengello Beach, erosion volumes were 97-108 m<sup>3</sup>/m for the central and southern parts of the beach, while the northern end only lost 18 m<sup>3</sup>/m of sand. In the central and southern parts of the embayment, a surf zone bar formed 50-100 m further seaward than is typical for this beach and was a temporary store of sand eroded from the beach-foredune. A nearshore wave model showed substantial variability in wave power along the 10 m depth contour and explained the partial sheltering of the northern end of the embayment from storm impact. An embayment-wide time-series of airborne LiDAR further emphasised the alongshore variability in beach-foredune erosion. The wide beach and broad, double-crested, well-vegetated foredune along much of the embayment was pivotal in protecting the shoreline. In the centre and south of the beach, recovery took nearly three years and although complete by volume, the foredune was narrower and less resilient. The results emphasise the role of wide beaches and natural vegetated foredunes in buffering extreme storms and suggest foredune rehabilitation should be a key management priority for sustainable coasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520999,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures","volume":"3 ","pages":"e25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12645341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2025.10015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The June 2016 extratropical cyclone with anomalous ENE storm wave direction caused widespread beach-foredune erosion in southeastern Australia. At Bengello Beach, erosion volumes were 97-108 m3/m for the central and southern parts of the beach, while the northern end only lost 18 m3/m of sand. In the central and southern parts of the embayment, a surf zone bar formed 50-100 m further seaward than is typical for this beach and was a temporary store of sand eroded from the beach-foredune. A nearshore wave model showed substantial variability in wave power along the 10 m depth contour and explained the partial sheltering of the northern end of the embayment from storm impact. An embayment-wide time-series of airborne LiDAR further emphasised the alongshore variability in beach-foredune erosion. The wide beach and broad, double-crested, well-vegetated foredune along much of the embayment was pivotal in protecting the shoreline. In the centre and south of the beach, recovery took nearly three years and although complete by volume, the foredune was narrower and less resilient. The results emphasise the role of wide beaches and natural vegetated foredunes in buffering extreme storms and suggest foredune rehabilitation should be a key management priority for sustainable coasts.

极端风暴对天然海滩-前丘系统的影响和恢复:2016年6月澳大利亚东南部本杰罗海滩的风暴。
2016年6月的温带气旋与反常的ENE风暴波方向在澳大利亚东南部造成了广泛的海滩-前沙丘侵蚀。在本杰罗海滩,海滩中部和南部的侵蚀量为97-108 m3/m,而北端仅损失了18 m3/m的沙子。在海湾的中部和南部,形成了一个比典型的海滩向海更远50-100米的冲浪带,是海滩前丘侵蚀的沙子的临时储存处。近岸波浪模型显示沿10米深度等高线波浪功率的显著变化,并解释了围堰北端部分遮挡风暴冲击的原因。机载激光雷达在整个海湾范围内的时间序列进一步强调了海滩前沙丘侵蚀的沿岸变化。宽阔的海滩和宽阔的,双峰的,植被繁茂的前沙丘沿着海湾的大部分是保护海岸线的关键。在海滩的中部和南部,恢复花了将近三年的时间,尽管按体积计算已经完成,但前沙丘更窄,弹性更弱。研究结果强调了宽阔的海滩和天然植被覆盖的前沙丘在缓冲极端风暴中的作用,并建议前沙丘恢复应成为可持续海岸的关键管理重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书