A comprehensive comparison between Terahertz and optical wireless communications.

NPJ wireless technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1038/s44459-025-00002-1
Mingqing Liu, Hossein Kazemi, Majid Safari, Iman Tavakkolnia, Harald Haas
{"title":"A comprehensive comparison between Terahertz and optical wireless communications.","authors":"Mingqing Liu, Hossein Kazemi, Majid Safari, Iman Tavakkolnia, Harald Haas","doi":"10.1038/s44459-025-00002-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents a comprehensive quantitative comparison between Terahertz (THz) communication and optical wireless communication (OWC) technologies, with a focus on indoor and outdoor deployment scenarios. For indoor environments, we compare THz and vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL)-based OWC systems by incorporating misalignment effects using a multi-ray THz channel model with antenna patterns and a Gaussian beam model for VCSELs. Unified beamwidth assumptions enable consistent evaluation. We further develop power consumption models capturing THz phase noise, VCSEL nonlinearities, and photodetector bandwidth-area tradeoffs, facilitating a detailed energy efficiency analysis under multi-transmitter coverage. For outdoor scenarios, we survey existing stochastic channel models that characterize path loss, pointing errors, and small-scale fading for both THz and free space optics (FSO) links. These models are applied to unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based use cases to evaluate communication robustness under dynamic conditions. Our findings highlight critical performance tradeoffs and deployment challenges, offering insights into the relative advantages of THz and OWC technologies in diverse environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":521122,"journal":{"name":"NPJ wireless technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ wireless technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44459-025-00002-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive quantitative comparison between Terahertz (THz) communication and optical wireless communication (OWC) technologies, with a focus on indoor and outdoor deployment scenarios. For indoor environments, we compare THz and vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL)-based OWC systems by incorporating misalignment effects using a multi-ray THz channel model with antenna patterns and a Gaussian beam model for VCSELs. Unified beamwidth assumptions enable consistent evaluation. We further develop power consumption models capturing THz phase noise, VCSEL nonlinearities, and photodetector bandwidth-area tradeoffs, facilitating a detailed energy efficiency analysis under multi-transmitter coverage. For outdoor scenarios, we survey existing stochastic channel models that characterize path loss, pointing errors, and small-scale fading for both THz and free space optics (FSO) links. These models are applied to unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based use cases to evaluate communication robustness under dynamic conditions. Our findings highlight critical performance tradeoffs and deployment challenges, offering insights into the relative advantages of THz and OWC technologies in diverse environments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

太赫兹与光学无线通信的综合比较。
本文对太赫兹(THz)通信和光无线通信(OWC)技术进行了全面的定量比较,重点讨论了室内和室外部署场景。在室内环境中,我们通过使用带天线方向图的多射线太赫兹通道模型和VCSEL的高斯波束模型,比较了太赫兹和基于垂直腔面发射激光(VCSEL)的OWC系统的不对准效应。统一的波束宽度假设使评估一致。我们进一步开发了捕获太赫兹相位噪声,VCSEL非线性和光电探测器带宽面积权衡的功耗模型,以便在多发射机覆盖下进行详细的能效分析。对于室外场景,我们调查了现有的随机信道模型,这些模型表征了太赫兹和自由空间光学(FSO)链路的路径损耗、指向误差和小尺度衰落。将这些模型应用于基于无人机的用例中,以评估动态条件下的通信鲁棒性。我们的研究结果强调了关键的性能权衡和部署挑战,提供了对太赫兹和OWC技术在不同环境中的相对优势的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书