From design to decision-making: emergency manager participation in the development of coastal storm decision support tools.

Noah Hallisey, Austin Becker, Peter Stempel, Olivia Krum
{"title":"From design to decision-making: emergency manager participation in the development of coastal storm decision support tools.","authors":"Noah Hallisey, Austin Becker, Peter Stempel, Olivia Krum","doi":"10.1007/s44367-025-00022-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Computer-based decision support tools (DSTs) are indispensable to emergency managers (EMs). Despite their proliferation in recent years, there is a persistent disconnect between the tools developed and their use. Developing tools with end-users has been recommended to ensure they have practical relevance and achieve widespread adoption and utilization. While existing work has primarily focused on DST development, end-user engagement in DST development and implementation has received less attention. In this paper, we review the existing literature on coastal storm DST development to determine whether and how researchers are engaging EMs in the development of DSTs and their reporting on the outcomes of these efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature review of coastal storm DST development, looking for mentions of EM engagement. Our search identified 286 articles, and the review was conducted on 65 of the articles that mentioned a DST, of which six explicitly mentioned engaging EMs in development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 286 articles we identified, only six articles explicitly report engaging EMs in tool development, suggesting low levels of engagement. We found limited reporting on the outcomes of these efforts. We identified four approaches from the six articles reviewed: (1) conduct a needs identify emergency managers' needs to guide the development; (2) from a collaborative team to engage emergency managers in tool development; (3) host workshops and training exercises with emergency managers using the tool to solicit feedback; and (4) use an iterative design approach to incorporate EM feedback into the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of our review reveal low levels of EM engagement reported in existing literature, which may reflect a disconnect between the tools being developed and their use by EMs. We also found limited reporting on the outcomes of these efforts, suggesting that most DSTs have yet to achieve mainstream use. Recommendations for research and practice include (1) increased reporting on the engagement of EM in DST development; (2) an assessment of the barriers related to DST development and implementation for both tool developers and EMs; (3) longitudinal studies or case studies of DST development and implementation; and (4) the creation of a standardized approach or set of best practices for DST development and implementation to increase their success.</p>","PeriodicalId":521120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of disaster science and management","volume":"1 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12645820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of disaster science and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44367-025-00022-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Computer-based decision support tools (DSTs) are indispensable to emergency managers (EMs). Despite their proliferation in recent years, there is a persistent disconnect between the tools developed and their use. Developing tools with end-users has been recommended to ensure they have practical relevance and achieve widespread adoption and utilization. While existing work has primarily focused on DST development, end-user engagement in DST development and implementation has received less attention. In this paper, we review the existing literature on coastal storm DST development to determine whether and how researchers are engaging EMs in the development of DSTs and their reporting on the outcomes of these efforts.

Methods: We conducted a literature review of coastal storm DST development, looking for mentions of EM engagement. Our search identified 286 articles, and the review was conducted on 65 of the articles that mentioned a DST, of which six explicitly mentioned engaging EMs in development.

Results: Of the 286 articles we identified, only six articles explicitly report engaging EMs in tool development, suggesting low levels of engagement. We found limited reporting on the outcomes of these efforts. We identified four approaches from the six articles reviewed: (1) conduct a needs identify emergency managers' needs to guide the development; (2) from a collaborative team to engage emergency managers in tool development; (3) host workshops and training exercises with emergency managers using the tool to solicit feedback; and (4) use an iterative design approach to incorporate EM feedback into the tool.

Conclusion: Findings of our review reveal low levels of EM engagement reported in existing literature, which may reflect a disconnect between the tools being developed and their use by EMs. We also found limited reporting on the outcomes of these efforts, suggesting that most DSTs have yet to achieve mainstream use. Recommendations for research and practice include (1) increased reporting on the engagement of EM in DST development; (2) an assessment of the barriers related to DST development and implementation for both tool developers and EMs; (3) longitudinal studies or case studies of DST development and implementation; and (4) the creation of a standardized approach or set of best practices for DST development and implementation to increase their success.

Abstract Image

从设计到决策:应急管理人员参与沿海风暴决策支持工具的开发。
基于计算机的决策支持工具(DSTs)对应急管理人员(EMs)来说是不可或缺的。尽管近年来这些工具越来越多,但在开发的工具和它们的使用之间存在着持续的脱节。建议为最终用户开发工具,以确保它们具有实际的相关性,并实现广泛的采用和利用。虽然现有的工作主要集中在DST开发上,终端用户在DST开发和实现中的参与受到的关注较少。在本文中,我们回顾了关于沿海风暴DST发展的现有文献,以确定研究人员是否以及如何参与DST的发展以及他们对这些努力的结果的报告。方法:我们进行了沿海风暴DST发展的文献综述,寻找提到的EM参与。我们检索了286篇文章,并对其中65篇提到了DST的文章进行了审查,其中6篇明确提到了让EMs参与开发。结果:在我们确定的286篇文章中,只有6篇文章明确地报告了参与工具开发的EMs,这表明参与度很低。我们发现关于这些努力的结果的报道有限。我们从审查的六篇文章中确定了四种方法:(1)进行需求识别应急管理人员的需求以指导发展;(2)组建协作团队,让应急管理人员参与工具开发;(3)与应急管理人员一起举办讲习班和培训演习,利用该工具征求反馈;(4)使用迭代设计方法将电磁反馈纳入工具。结论:我们的研究结果显示,现有文献中报告的EM参与程度较低,这可能反映了正在开发的工具与EM使用之间的脱节。我们还发现关于这些努力的结果的报道有限,这表明大多数DSTs尚未实现主流使用。对研究和实践的建议包括:(1)增加关于新兴市场参与DST发展的报告;(2)对工具开发人员和EMs开发和实施DST相关障碍的评估;(3) DST开发和实施的纵向研究或案例研究;(4)创建用于DST开发和实施的标准化方法或最佳实践集,以增加其成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书