The problem of isolating and measuring empathy.

IF 1 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Riana Betzler
{"title":"The problem of isolating and measuring empathy.","authors":"Riana Betzler","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00702-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1949, the social psychologists Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr. and Rosalind Dymond wrote a paper calling for increased attention to the empathic responses in empirical social psychology. The empathic responses, they wrote, \"occupy a crucial position in human interaction and adjustment\" (Psychiatry 12(4):355-359, 1949, https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1949.11022747 ). Not only practically important for therapy and communication, the empathic responses were considered to be foundational for the very development of the self. In this paper, I examine challenges that arose in the 1940s and 1950s, when researchers attempted to subject empathy to scientific scrutiny. I focus specifically on conceptual and methodological problems that Dymond faced in developing her measures of empathy, which are typically considered to be the first in existence. This foray into the history of empathy measures offers a case study for considering questions about validity and coherence in the philosophy of psychological measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-025-00702-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1949, the social psychologists Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr. and Rosalind Dymond wrote a paper calling for increased attention to the empathic responses in empirical social psychology. The empathic responses, they wrote, "occupy a crucial position in human interaction and adjustment" (Psychiatry 12(4):355-359, 1949, https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1949.11022747 ). Not only practically important for therapy and communication, the empathic responses were considered to be foundational for the very development of the self. In this paper, I examine challenges that arose in the 1940s and 1950s, when researchers attempted to subject empathy to scientific scrutiny. I focus specifically on conceptual and methodological problems that Dymond faced in developing her measures of empathy, which are typically considered to be the first in existence. This foray into the history of empathy measures offers a case study for considering questions about validity and coherence in the philosophy of psychological measurement.

隔离和衡量同理心的问题。
1949年,社会心理学家伦纳德·s·科特雷尔(Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr.)和罗莎琳德·戴蒙德(Rosalind Dymond)写了一篇论文,呼吁在经验社会心理学中增加对移情反应的关注。他们写道,共情反应“在人类的互动和调整中占据着至关重要的地位”(精神病学12(4):355-359,1949,https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1949.11022747)。移情反应不仅对治疗和交流具有实际意义,而且被认为是自我发展的基础。在本文中,我研究了20世纪40年代和50年代出现的挑战,当时研究人员试图将同理心置于科学审查之下。我特别关注戴蒙德在开发她的移情测量方法时所面临的概念和方法问题,这通常被认为是第一个存在的问题。这对共情测量的历史的探索为考虑心理测量哲学中的有效性和一致性问题提供了一个案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书