Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Surgery: From Diagnostics and Preoperative Planning to Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2743-4868
Richard Gnatzy, Xiaoyan Feng, Daniel Graefe, Oliver J Deffaa, Martin Lacher
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Surgery: From Diagnostics and Preoperative Planning to Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications.","authors":"Richard Gnatzy, Xiaoyan Feng, Daniel Graefe, Oliver J Deffaa, Martin Lacher","doi":"10.1055/a-2743-4868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored in pediatric surgical care, yet its translation into diagnostics and preoperative planning lags behind adult surgery. Unlike prior reviews, this study provides a comprehensive synthesis across four domains, diagnostics, preoperative planning, risk stratification, and surgical error prevention, highlighting recent advances and unmet challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE (2020-2025) identified peer-reviewed studies on AI in pediatric surgery. Eligible articles addressed one of the four domains and were assessed for methodology, clinical applicability, and relevance to pediatric surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic imaging is the most advanced field, with deep learning models for fracture detection and bone age assessment achieving accuracies up to 95% and near-expert agreement, though external validation is scarce. Preoperative planning benefits from AI-driven segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality, with reports of altered surgical strategy in up to 8% of oncology cases, but evidence of outcome benefit is limited. Risk models for appendicitis and congenital heart surgery often surpass clinical scores, yet fewer than 10% have undergone external validation. Tools for error prevention, such as intelligent checklists and workflow monitoring, remain at the proof-of-concept stage. Across domains, most studies are retrospective, single-center, and methodologically heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI demonstrates tangible potential to improve pediatric surgical diagnostics, planning, and safety. However, translation into clinical practice requires multicenter pediatric datasets, prospective validation, and transparent, interpretable models. By consolidating the most recent evidence across four domains, this review outlines both the opportunities and critical gaps that should be addressed for safe and effective adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"174-183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2743-4868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored in pediatric surgical care, yet its translation into diagnostics and preoperative planning lags behind adult surgery. Unlike prior reviews, this study provides a comprehensive synthesis across four domains, diagnostics, preoperative planning, risk stratification, and surgical error prevention, highlighting recent advances and unmet challenges.

Methods: A narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE (2020-2025) identified peer-reviewed studies on AI in pediatric surgery. Eligible articles addressed one of the four domains and were assessed for methodology, clinical applicability, and relevance to pediatric surgical patients.

Results: Diagnostic imaging is the most advanced field, with deep learning models for fracture detection and bone age assessment achieving accuracies up to 95% and near-expert agreement, though external validation is scarce. Preoperative planning benefits from AI-driven segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality, with reports of altered surgical strategy in up to 8% of oncology cases, but evidence of outcome benefit is limited. Risk models for appendicitis and congenital heart surgery often surpass clinical scores, yet fewer than 10% have undergone external validation. Tools for error prevention, such as intelligent checklists and workflow monitoring, remain at the proof-of-concept stage. Across domains, most studies are retrospective, single-center, and methodologically heterogeneous.

Conclusion: AI demonstrates tangible potential to improve pediatric surgical diagnostics, planning, and safety. However, translation into clinical practice requires multicenter pediatric datasets, prospective validation, and transparent, interpretable models. By consolidating the most recent evidence across four domains, this review outlines both the opportunities and critical gaps that should be addressed for safe and effective adoption.

人工智能在儿科外科:从诊断和术前计划到风险分层:当前应用的全面回顾。
人工智能(AI)在儿科外科护理中的探索越来越多,但其在诊断和术前计划方面的转化滞后于成人手术。与之前的综述不同,本研究提供了四个领域的全面综合,诊断,术前计划,风险分层和手术错误预防,突出了最近的进展和未遇到的挑战。PubMed/MEDLINE(2020-2025)的叙述性综述确定了人工智能在儿科外科中的同行评议研究。符合条件的文章涉及四个领域之一,并对方法学、临床适用性和与儿科外科患者的相关性进行评估。诊断成像是最先进的领域,尽管缺乏外部验证,但用于骨折检测和骨龄评估的深度学习模型的准确率高达95%,接近专家的一致性。术前规划受益于人工智能驱动的分割、3D重建和虚拟现实,据报道,高达8%的肿瘤病例改变了手术策略,但结果获益的证据有限。阑尾炎和先天性心脏手术的风险模型通常超过临床评分,但只有不到10%的人进行了外部验证。用于错误预防的工具,如智能检查清单和工作流监控,仍处于概念验证阶段。在各个领域,大多数研究都是回顾性的、单中心的、方法上不一致的。人工智能在改善儿科手术诊断、计划和安全方面显示出切实的潜力。然而,将其转化为临床实践需要多中心儿科数据集、前瞻性验证和透明、可解释的模型。通过整合四个领域的最新证据,本综述概述了为安全有效地采用该技术应解决的机遇和关键差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书