Diagnostic Accuracy of Tools to Identify Anxiety Symptoms and Disorders in Persons with Dementia: a Systematic Review Update.

IF 1.8 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2025-12-03 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.28.875
Kayla Atchison, Pauline Wu, Dallas Seitz, Jennifer A Watt, Zahra Goodarzi
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Tools to Identify Anxiety Symptoms and Disorders in Persons with Dementia: a Systematic Review Update.","authors":"Kayla Atchison, Pauline Wu, Dallas Seitz, Jennifer A Watt, Zahra Goodarzi","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited anxiety tools validated against a diagnostic gold standard in the context of dementia have been identified. A systematic review update was completed to identify publications since 2017 describing tools to detect anxiety in persons with dementia compared to a diagnostic gold standard. The original search strategy was replicated in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. Pooled prevalence and diagnostic accuracy estimates were calculated based on three or more studies presenting comparable information from either the original or updated review search. No pooled estimates were calculated in the original review given limited evidence. One study evaluating the Rating Anxiety in Dementia (RAID) scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale met review inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (n=3, 36.7%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 24.3-49.2%) and diagnostic accuracy outcomes for the RAID scale (≥11 cut-off) to detect GAD (n=3, sensitivity: 89%, 95% CI: 78-95%; specificity: 73%, 95% CI: 60-82%) were calculated using data from two studies identified in the original review and the newly included study from the review update. The RAID scale has the most evidence and adequate sensitivity to support its use in identifying anxiety in persons with dementia. Validated tools to detect anxiety in persons with dementia remain understudied.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 4","pages":"374-381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12646701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.28.875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited anxiety tools validated against a diagnostic gold standard in the context of dementia have been identified. A systematic review update was completed to identify publications since 2017 describing tools to detect anxiety in persons with dementia compared to a diagnostic gold standard. The original search strategy was replicated in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. Pooled prevalence and diagnostic accuracy estimates were calculated based on three or more studies presenting comparable information from either the original or updated review search. No pooled estimates were calculated in the original review given limited evidence. One study evaluating the Rating Anxiety in Dementia (RAID) scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale met review inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (n=3, 36.7%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 24.3-49.2%) and diagnostic accuracy outcomes for the RAID scale (≥11 cut-off) to detect GAD (n=3, sensitivity: 89%, 95% CI: 78-95%; specificity: 73%, 95% CI: 60-82%) were calculated using data from two studies identified in the original review and the newly included study from the review update. The RAID scale has the most evidence and adequate sensitivity to support its use in identifying anxiety in persons with dementia. Validated tools to detect anxiety in persons with dementia remain understudied.

识别痴呆患者焦虑症状和障碍的工具的诊断准确性:系统回顾更新
在痴呆症的背景下,有限的焦虑工具已被确定为诊断金标准。完成了一项系统评价更新,以确定自2017年以来的出版物,这些出版物描述了与诊断金标准相比检测痴呆症患者焦虑的工具。原始的搜索策略在MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO中被复制。合并患病率和诊断准确性估计是根据三个或更多的研究计算的,这些研究提供了来自原始或更新的综述搜索的可比信息。由于证据有限,在最初的综述中没有计算汇总估计。一项评估痴呆焦虑评定量表(RAID)、神经精神量表和汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表的研究符合综述纳入标准。广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的总患病率(n=3, 36.7%, 95%置信区间(CI): 24.3-49.2%)和检测GAD的RAID量表(临界值≥11)的诊断准确性结果(n=3,敏感性:89%,95% CI: 78-95%;特异性:73%,95% CI: 60-82%)使用原始综述中确定的两项研究和更新综述中新纳入的研究的数据计算。RAID量表有最充分的证据和足够的敏感性来支持它在识别痴呆患者焦虑方面的应用。检测痴呆症患者焦虑的有效工具仍未得到充分研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书