Understanding suicide risk assessment practices in psychotic disorders: insights from Canadian mental health professionals, a preliminary investigation.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2025.2595611
Félix Diotte, Christine Genest, Rami Nemeh, Adassa Payant, Hugo Thomas, Iness Arif, Philip Tibbo, Alicia Spidel, Marc-André Roy, Audrey Livet, Colleen Murphy, Tania Lecomte
{"title":"Understanding suicide risk assessment practices in psychotic disorders: insights from Canadian mental health professionals, a preliminary investigation.","authors":"Félix Diotte, Christine Genest, Rami Nemeh, Adassa Payant, Hugo Thomas, Iness Arif, Philip Tibbo, Alicia Spidel, Marc-André Roy, Audrey Livet, Colleen Murphy, Tania Lecomte","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2595611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Canada, more than 4,500 people die by suicide annually, with individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders being at significantly higher risk. Although the risk factors for suicide in this population are well-established, the assessment of suicide risk remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines the practices of mental health professionals working with clients with a psychotic disorder in relation to suicide risk assessment, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey of 148 professionals across Canada was conducted to assess factors influencing the frequency and thoroughness of suicide risk assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite our perceived behavioral control scale having psychometrical flaws, results revealed that social norms were a significant predictor of systematic suicide risk assessments. Professionals identified a lack of time, training, and inadequate clinical tools as major obstacles to thorough assessments. Despite the widespread availability of suicide risk assessment training, many professionals did not feel adequately prepared or confident in conducting such assessments, particularly with clients with a psychotic disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for enhanced support, training, and organizational changes to improve the systematic assessment of suicide risk in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"66-75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2025.2595611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Canada, more than 4,500 people die by suicide annually, with individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders being at significantly higher risk. Although the risk factors for suicide in this population are well-established, the assessment of suicide risk remains underexplored.

Aim: This study examines the practices of mental health professionals working with clients with a psychotic disorder in relation to suicide risk assessment, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a theoretical framework.

Method: A survey of 148 professionals across Canada was conducted to assess factors influencing the frequency and thoroughness of suicide risk assessments.

Results: Despite our perceived behavioral control scale having psychometrical flaws, results revealed that social norms were a significant predictor of systematic suicide risk assessments. Professionals identified a lack of time, training, and inadequate clinical tools as major obstacles to thorough assessments. Despite the widespread availability of suicide risk assessment training, many professionals did not feel adequately prepared or confident in conducting such assessments, particularly with clients with a psychotic disorder.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for enhanced support, training, and organizational changes to improve the systematic assessment of suicide risk in this vulnerable population.

了解精神病患者自杀风险评估实践:来自加拿大精神卫生专业人员的初步调查。
背景:在加拿大,每年有超过4500人死于自杀,被诊断患有精神疾病的人自杀的风险要高得多。尽管这一人群的自杀风险因素已经确定,但对自杀风险的评估仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究以计划行为理论(TPB)为理论框架,探讨心理健康专业人员与精神障碍患者进行自杀风险评估的实践。方法:对加拿大148名专业人员进行调查,评估影响自杀风险评估频率和彻彻性的因素。结果:尽管我们的行为控制量表存在心理测量上的缺陷,但结果显示,社会规范是系统自杀风险评估的重要预测因子。专业人员认为缺乏时间、培训和临床工具不足是进行彻底评估的主要障碍。尽管自杀风险评估培训广泛存在,但许多专业人员对进行此类评估缺乏充分的准备或信心,特别是对患有精神障碍的客户。结论:研究结果强调需要加强支持、培训和组织变革,以改进对这一弱势群体自杀风险的系统评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书