Development and validation of the Lao Clinical Nurse Competency Scale.

IF 2.1 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2025-11-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.4094
Toyomitsu Tamura, Souksavanh Phanpaseuth, Anousone Sisoulath, Phengdy Inthaphanith, Shikino Kikuchi, Kyoko Koto-Shimada, Kazumi Fujiwara, Nobuko Matsuda
{"title":"Development and validation of the Lao Clinical Nurse Competency Scale.","authors":"Toyomitsu Tamura, Souksavanh Phanpaseuth, Anousone Sisoulath, Phengdy Inthaphanith, Shikino Kikuchi, Kyoko Koto-Shimada, Kazumi Fujiwara, Nobuko Matsuda","doi":"10.33546/bnj.4094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ministry of Health in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos) has developed a national nursing competency framework comprising five domains and 43 items, aligned with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) core competencies. However, nurses' actual competencies in Laos have not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a measurement scale to assess the clinical competencies of nurses working in healthcare facilities and clinical settings in Laos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was created based on the National Competency for Licensed Nurses in Laos (NCLN) and distributed to 359 nurses in Vientiane Capital and Champasak Province in October 2022. Responses from 355 nurses were analyzed. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was then performed solely to evaluate the goodness of fit of the proposed model, rather than to confirm the factor structure. Content validity was verified by expert review, and reliability was assessed using the Spearman-Brown coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and McDonald's omega (ω).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA identified five factors, comprising 26 items, which explained 73.2% of the variance. The SEM showed an acceptable model fit: χ<sup>2</sup>(289) = 698.2, <i>p</i> <0.001; GFI = 0.86; AGFI = 0.83; CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.066. Expert review confirmed the content validity. Reliability was high (Spearman-Brown = 0.934; Cronbach's α = 0.880; McDonald's ω = 0.971).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Lao Clinical Nurse Competency Scale (CAS) demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability. SEM was used only to assess the model's goodness of fit, and future studies should conduct confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using independent samples to verify construct validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"11 6","pages":"674-683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12648231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Ministry of Health in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos) has developed a national nursing competency framework comprising five domains and 43 items, aligned with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) core competencies. However, nurses' actual competencies in Laos have not been systematically evaluated.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a measurement scale to assess the clinical competencies of nurses working in healthcare facilities and clinical settings in Laos.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was created based on the National Competency for Licensed Nurses in Laos (NCLN) and distributed to 359 nurses in Vientiane Capital and Champasak Province in October 2022. Responses from 355 nurses were analyzed. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was then performed solely to evaluate the goodness of fit of the proposed model, rather than to confirm the factor structure. Content validity was verified by expert review, and reliability was assessed using the Spearman-Brown coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and McDonald's omega (ω).

Results: The EFA identified five factors, comprising 26 items, which explained 73.2% of the variance. The SEM showed an acceptable model fit: χ2(289) = 698.2, p <0.001; GFI = 0.86; AGFI = 0.83; CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.066. Expert review confirmed the content validity. Reliability was high (Spearman-Brown = 0.934; Cronbach's α = 0.880; McDonald's ω = 0.971).

Conclusion: The Lao Clinical Nurse Competency Scale (CAS) demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability. SEM was used only to assess the model's goodness of fit, and future studies should conduct confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using independent samples to verify construct validity.

Abstract Image

老挝临床护士能力量表的开发与验证。
背景:老挝人民民主共和国(老挝)卫生部制定了一个国家护理能力框架,包括五个领域和43个项目,与东南亚国家联盟(东盟)的核心能力保持一致。然而,老挝护士的实际能力尚未得到系统评估。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一种测量量表,以评估在老挝医疗机构和临床环境中工作的护士的临床能力。方法:根据《老挝执业护士国家胜任力》(NCLN)编制自填问卷,于2022年10月向万象首都和占巴塞省的359名护士发放问卷。对355名护士的反馈进行了分析。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)检验结构效度。然后进行结构方程建模(SEM),仅用于评估所提出模型的拟合优度,而不是确定因素结构。内容效度采用专家评审验证,信度采用Spearman-Brown系数、Cronbach’s alpha和McDonald’s omega (ω)评估。结果:EFA确定了5个因素,包括26个项目,解释了73.2%的方差。扫描电镜显示了可接受的模型拟合:χ2(289) = 698.2, p结论:老挝临床护士胜任力量表(CAS)具有令人满意的效度和信度。SEM仅用于评估模型的拟合优度,未来的研究应采用独立样本进行验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA)来验证结构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书