Pilot randomized trial of cash transfer interventions to improve health outcomes in low income adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: Study protocol and baseline characteristics

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2025.108171
Jennifer A. Campbell, Rebekah J. Walker, Leonard E. Egede
{"title":"Pilot randomized trial of cash transfer interventions to improve health outcomes in low income adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: Study protocol and baseline characteristics","authors":"Jennifer A. Campbell,&nbsp;Rebekah J. Walker,&nbsp;Leonard E. Egede","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.108171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Monetary interventions, such as cash transfers, have emerged as important intervention approaches to address the complex determinants at the structural and individual level impacting diabetes outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This NIH funded (K01DK131319), pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an ongoing 5 year study to evaluate the efficacy of two diabetes-tailored cash transfer interventions in low-income adults in which 1) cash transfers are conditional on participating in nurse-led, telephone-delivered diabetes education/skills training and stress/coping intervention delivered every 2 weeks for 6 months (DM-CCT); or 2) cash transfers are unconditional (DM-UCT), on clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure), and quality of life among 100 African Americans aged 18+ years with T2DM and HbA1c ≥8 %. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3-, and 6-months with primary outcome at 6 months post-randomization.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Recruitment began in March 2023 and was completed in February 2024. Average age was 51 years. Most participants were women (71.0 %). Mean HbA1c was 10.1±1.8 for DM-CCT group and 10.2±1.8 for DM-UCT group. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 128.0±22.7 mmHg and 80.2±13.7 mmHg for DM-CCT group and 133.5±22.2 mmHg and 83.7±13.7 mmHg for DM-UCT group. Mean BMI was 36.2±10.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for DM-CCT and 35.7±9.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for DM-UCT. This pilot RCT represents a promising intervention to address the underlying poverty driven social risk factors while simultaneously addressing diabetes specific behaviors to improve outcomes. Findings from this study will provide preliminary evidence on efficacy of cash transfer interventions to improve clinical outcomes in low-income adults with poorly controlled T2DM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 108171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425003659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Monetary interventions, such as cash transfers, have emerged as important intervention approaches to address the complex determinants at the structural and individual level impacting diabetes outcomes.

Methods

This NIH funded (K01DK131319), pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an ongoing 5 year study to evaluate the efficacy of two diabetes-tailored cash transfer interventions in low-income adults in which 1) cash transfers are conditional on participating in nurse-led, telephone-delivered diabetes education/skills training and stress/coping intervention delivered every 2 weeks for 6 months (DM-CCT); or 2) cash transfers are unconditional (DM-UCT), on clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure), and quality of life among 100 African Americans aged 18+ years with T2DM and HbA1c ≥8 %. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3-, and 6-months with primary outcome at 6 months post-randomization.

Discussion

Recruitment began in March 2023 and was completed in February 2024. Average age was 51 years. Most participants were women (71.0 %). Mean HbA1c was 10.1±1.8 for DM-CCT group and 10.2±1.8 for DM-UCT group. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 128.0±22.7 mmHg and 80.2±13.7 mmHg for DM-CCT group and 133.5±22.2 mmHg and 83.7±13.7 mmHg for DM-UCT group. Mean BMI was 36.2±10.3 kg/m2 for DM-CCT and 35.7±9.2 kg/m2 for DM-UCT. This pilot RCT represents a promising intervention to address the underlying poverty driven social risk factors while simultaneously addressing diabetes specific behaviors to improve outcomes. Findings from this study will provide preliminary evidence on efficacy of cash transfer interventions to improve clinical outcomes in low-income adults with poorly controlled T2DM.
现金转移干预改善控制不佳的低收入成人2型糖尿病患者健康结局的试点随机试验:研究方案和基线特征
背景:货币干预,如现金转移,已经成为解决影响糖尿病结局的结构和个人层面的复杂决定因素的重要干预方法。方法:美国国立卫生研究院资助(K01DK131319),试点随机对照试验(RCT)是一项持续5 年的研究,旨在评估两种针对低收入成年人的糖尿病量身定制的现金转移干预措施的效果,其中1)现金转移的条件是参加护士主导的、电话提供的糖尿病教育/技能培训和压力/应对干预,每2 周提供一次,持续6 个月(DM-CCT);或2)现金转移是无条件的(DM-UCT),对临床结果(HbA1c和血压)和100名18岁以上的非裔美国人T2DM和HbA1c≥8 %的生活质量有影响。评估将在基线、3个月和6个月进行,主要结果在随机化后6 个月进行。讨论:招聘于2023年3月开始,2024年2月完成。平均年龄为51岁 岁。大多数参与者为女性(71.0 %)。DM-CCT组平均HbA1c为10.1±1.8,DM-UCT组平均HbA1c为10.2±1.8。DM-CCT组平均收缩压和舒张压分别为128.0±22.7 mmHg和80.2±13.7 mmHg, DM-UCT组平均收缩压和舒张压分别为133.5±22.2 mmHg和83.7±13.7 mmHg。DM-CCT的平均BMI为36.2±10.3 kg/m2, DM-UCT的平均BMI为35.7±9.2 kg/m2。该试验RCT代表了一种有希望的干预措施,可以解决潜在的贫困驱动社会风险因素,同时解决糖尿病特定行为以改善结果。本研究的结果将为现金转移干预改善控制不良的低收入成人T2DM患者临床结果的有效性提供初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书