Artificial intelligence in hepatology: A comprehensive scoping review of clinical applications, challenges, and future directions

iLIVER Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100205
Kirolos Eskandar
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in hepatology: A comprehensive scoping review of clinical applications, challenges, and future directions","authors":"Kirolos Eskandar","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into hepatology, yet the existing evidence is fragmented. This scoping review systematically mapped clinical AI applications across hepatology, summarized validated outcomes, and highlighted implementation challenges and research priorities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the Arksey–O’Malley and Levac frameworks and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (January 2018–July 2025), complemented by grey-literature screening, identified relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. From 3214 records, 75 studies met inclusion criteria. (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251159117).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies were retrospective and single-center. Imaging models achieved area-under-curve values of 0.80–0.95 for fibrosis staging, lesion detection, and volumetry, often comparable with expert radiologists. Digital-pathology algorithms enabled objective quantification of fibrosis and steatosis. Machine-learning tools improved prediction of disease progression, readmission, and mortality compared with conventional scores, while AI-based transplantation models enhanced donor–recipient matching and graft-survival forecasting. Natural-language-processing systems facilitated early complication detection from electronic health records. Common barriers included small datasets, limited external validation, and model interpretability concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI demonstrates strong potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and workflow enhancement in hepatology. Its responsible translation requires multimodal data integration, explainable modeling, prospective and multicenter validation, and equity-focused deployment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947825000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into hepatology, yet the existing evidence is fragmented. This scoping review systematically mapped clinical AI applications across hepatology, summarized validated outcomes, and highlighted implementation challenges and research priorities.

Methods

Following the Arksey–O’Malley and Levac frameworks and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (January 2018–July 2025), complemented by grey-literature screening, identified relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. From 3214 records, 75 studies met inclusion criteria. (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251159117).

Results

Most studies were retrospective and single-center. Imaging models achieved area-under-curve values of 0.80–0.95 for fibrosis staging, lesion detection, and volumetry, often comparable with expert radiologists. Digital-pathology algorithms enabled objective quantification of fibrosis and steatosis. Machine-learning tools improved prediction of disease progression, readmission, and mortality compared with conventional scores, while AI-based transplantation models enhanced donor–recipient matching and graft-survival forecasting. Natural-language-processing systems facilitated early complication detection from electronic health records. Common barriers included small datasets, limited external validation, and model interpretability concerns.

Conclusions

AI demonstrates strong potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and workflow enhancement in hepatology. Its responsible translation requires multimodal data integration, explainable modeling, prospective and multicenter validation, and equity-focused deployment strategies.
人工智能在肝病学中的应用:临床应用、挑战和未来方向的全面综述
背景和目的人工智能(AI)越来越多地融入肝病学,但现有的证据是碎片化的。本综述系统地描绘了人工智能在肝病学领域的临床应用,总结了经过验证的结果,并强调了实施挑战和研究重点。方法遵循Arksey-O 'Malley和Levac框架,并根据PRISMA-ScR报告,系统检索PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science和IEEE Xplore(2018年1月- 2025年7月),并辅以灰色文献筛选,确定相关研究。两名审稿人独立筛选和提取数据。从3214份记录中,有75项研究符合纳入标准。(prospero id: crd420251159117)。结果大多数研究为回顾性和单中心研究。成像模型在纤维化分期、病变检测和体积测量方面的曲线下面积值为0.80-0.95,通常与放射科专家相当。数字病理学算法能够客观量化纤维化和脂肪变性。与传统评分相比,机器学习工具改善了疾病进展、再入院和死亡率的预测,而基于人工智能的移植模型增强了供体-受体匹配和移植物存活预测。自然语言处理系统有助于从电子健康记录中发现早期并发症。常见的障碍包括小数据集、有限的外部验证和模型可解释性问题。结论:ai在肝病学诊断、预后和工作流程改进方面具有强大的潜力。其负责任的翻译需要多模态数据集成、可解释的建模、前瞻性和多中心验证以及以股票为中心的部署策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书