A hybrid Bayesian BWM-machine learning framework for university digital transformation assessment: Integrating expert clustering and predictive validation

IF 12.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Technology in Society Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170
Huai-Wei Lo , Sheng-Wei Lin
{"title":"A hybrid Bayesian BWM-machine learning framework for university digital transformation assessment: Integrating expert clustering and predictive validation","authors":"Huai-Wei Lo ,&nbsp;Sheng-Wei Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence–driven technologies has underscored the need for universities to undergo a comprehensive digital transformation. This study introduces a novel hybrid framework that combines the Bayesian best–worst method (BBWM) with machine learning techniques to identify and assess key success factors for university digital transformation. This study integrates expert clustering analysis and predictive modeling validation to provide enhanced decision support capabilities. Through systematic evaluation of 27 experts across 5 key dimensions—digital infrastructure, teaching and learning, research, administration and governance, and stakeholder engagement—the analysis revealed critical insights into transformation priorities. Clustering analysis identified seven distinct stakeholder assessment patterns, demonstrating significant heterogeneity in evaluation approaches across professional backgrounds and experience levels. Digital skills and literacy development emerged as the most influential factor, followed by the availability of online learning resources and the adequacy of network infrastructure. Methodological validation demonstrated exceptional convergence between the BBWM and traditional BWM (correlation coefficient: 0.9961), whereas machine learning validation confirmed the robustness of dimensional priority hierarchies through feature importance analysis. The hybrid framework achieved a ranking confidence of 70.23 % and provides stakeholder-specific insights for developing differentiated implementation strategies. This study contributes to the digital transformation literature by presenting the first integration of Bayesian inference and machine learning for university assessment, providing evidence-based frameworks to support strategic technology planning and resource allocation in an increasingly digital educational landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103170"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25003604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence–driven technologies has underscored the need for universities to undergo a comprehensive digital transformation. This study introduces a novel hybrid framework that combines the Bayesian best–worst method (BBWM) with machine learning techniques to identify and assess key success factors for university digital transformation. This study integrates expert clustering analysis and predictive modeling validation to provide enhanced decision support capabilities. Through systematic evaluation of 27 experts across 5 key dimensions—digital infrastructure, teaching and learning, research, administration and governance, and stakeholder engagement—the analysis revealed critical insights into transformation priorities. Clustering analysis identified seven distinct stakeholder assessment patterns, demonstrating significant heterogeneity in evaluation approaches across professional backgrounds and experience levels. Digital skills and literacy development emerged as the most influential factor, followed by the availability of online learning resources and the adequacy of network infrastructure. Methodological validation demonstrated exceptional convergence between the BBWM and traditional BWM (correlation coefficient: 0.9961), whereas machine learning validation confirmed the robustness of dimensional priority hierarchies through feature importance analysis. The hybrid framework achieved a ranking confidence of 70.23 % and provides stakeholder-specific insights for developing differentiated implementation strategies. This study contributes to the digital transformation literature by presenting the first integration of Bayesian inference and machine learning for university assessment, providing evidence-based frameworks to support strategic technology planning and resource allocation in an increasingly digital educational landscape.
用于大学数字化转型评估的混合贝叶斯bwm -机器学习框架:集成专家聚类和预测验证
人工智能驱动技术的快速发展凸显了大学进行全面数字化转型的必要性。本研究引入了一种新的混合框架,将贝叶斯最佳-最差方法(BBWM)与机器学习技术相结合,以识别和评估大学数字化转型的关键成功因素。本研究整合了专家聚类分析和预测模型验证,以提供增强的决策支持能力。通过对27位专家在5个关键维度(数字基础设施、教学与学习、研究、管理与治理以及利益相关者参与)的系统评估,分析揭示了对转型优先事项的关键见解。聚类分析确定了七种不同的利益相关者评估模式,显示了不同专业背景和经验水平的评估方法的显著异质性。数字技能和扫盲发展成为最具影响力的因素,其次是在线学习资源的可用性和网络基础设施的充足性。方法验证表明,BBWM与传统BWM之间具有出色的收敛性(相关系数:0.9961),而机器学习验证通过特征重要性分析证实了维度优先级层次的鲁棒性。混合框架的置信度达到70.23%,并为制定差异化实施策略提供了特定于利益相关者的见解。本研究通过首次将贝叶斯推理和机器学习整合到大学评估中,为数字化转型文献做出了贡献,提供了基于证据的框架,以支持日益数字化的教育环境中的战略技术规划和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书