Failed facemask ventilation in a patient with recent dermal filler injections

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
L. A. Whitton, S. Watson
{"title":"Failed facemask ventilation in a patient with recent dermal filler injections","authors":"L. A. Whitton,&nbsp;S. Watson","doi":"10.1002/anr3.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The rising popularity of facial cosmetic procedures presents new challenges for peri-operative anaesthetic care. We report a case of failed facemask ventilation in a woman with recent dermal filler injections to her cheeks and chin and without any well-described predictors of a difficult airway. After pre-oxygenation and induction of anaesthesia, attempts at facemask ventilation failed to achieve an effective seal as the augmented areas were unusually firm and unyielding, preventing proper mask fit. Despite head optimisation and chin lift, insertion of an oropharyngeal airway and the use of a two-person technique effective ventilation could not be achieved. Early insertion of a second-generation supraglottic airway device restored ventilation and allowed surgery to proceed safely. This case illustrates how dermal fillers can alter facial compliance, obscure anatomical predictors of difficulty, and even be mistaken for allergic swelling. Anaesthetists are encouraged to ask specifically about cosmetic procedures, use inclusive language to promote disclosure and adapt airway plans accordingly.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72186,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia reports","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.70040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising popularity of facial cosmetic procedures presents new challenges for peri-operative anaesthetic care. We report a case of failed facemask ventilation in a woman with recent dermal filler injections to her cheeks and chin and without any well-described predictors of a difficult airway. After pre-oxygenation and induction of anaesthesia, attempts at facemask ventilation failed to achieve an effective seal as the augmented areas were unusually firm and unyielding, preventing proper mask fit. Despite head optimisation and chin lift, insertion of an oropharyngeal airway and the use of a two-person technique effective ventilation could not be achieved. Early insertion of a second-generation supraglottic airway device restored ventilation and allowed surgery to proceed safely. This case illustrates how dermal fillers can alter facial compliance, obscure anatomical predictors of difficulty, and even be mistaken for allergic swelling. Anaesthetists are encouraged to ask specifically about cosmetic procedures, use inclusive language to promote disclosure and adapt airway plans accordingly.

最近注射真皮填充物的患者面罩通气失败
面部美容手术的日益普及对围手术期麻醉护理提出了新的挑战。我们报告一例失败的面罩通气在一名妇女最近真皮填充物注射到她的脸颊和下巴,没有任何描述良好的预测困难的气道。在预充氧和麻醉诱导后,由于增强区域异常坚固和不屈服,导致面罩不适合,因此尝试面罩通气未能达到有效的密封。尽管头部优化和下巴提升,插入口咽气道和使用双人技术的有效通气不能实现。早期插入第二代声门上气道装置恢复通气并允许手术安全进行。这个病例说明了真皮填充物如何改变面部顺应性,模糊解剖学上的困难预测,甚至被误认为过敏性肿胀。鼓励麻醉师明确询问美容手术,使用包容性语言促进信息披露,并相应地调整气道计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书