Irene Santos-Pardo, Mikael Andersson Franko, Robin Hofmann, Thomas Nyström
{"title":"Coronary Stent Failure in Patients With Diabetes: A Nationwide Observational Study From SWEDEHEART","authors":"Irene Santos-Pardo, Mikael Andersson Franko, Robin Hofmann, Thomas Nyström","doi":"10.2337/dc25-1624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The association between diabetes and coronary stent failure is poorly established with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). We aimed to evaluate the risk of stent failure in patients with diabetes compared with those without diabetes after implantation of second-generation DES. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS All patients in Sweden who received second-generation DES between 2010 and 2020 were included and categorized into three groups: type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and without diabetes (reference group). The primary end point was stent failure, defined as in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by Cox regression models. Sensitivity analyses were performed to address missing data in covariates and account for death as a competing risk. RESULTS The study included 160,523 patients: 2,406 with type 1 diabetes, 43,377 with type 2 diabetes, and 114,740 without diabetes. Seventy-one percent were male. Over a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, 5,510 stent failure events occurred. The fully adjusted HR for stent failure was 2.28 (95% CI 1.97–2.65) for patients with type 1 and 1.35 (95% CI 1.27–1.44) for patients with type 2 diabetes, compared with individuals without diabetes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with both in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis contributing to the increased risk. CONCLUSIONS We observed a significantly higher risk of second-generation DES stent failure in individuals with type 1 diabetes followed by those with type 2 diabetes, compared with individuals without diabetes. This elevated risk was attributed to both in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-1624","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The association between diabetes and coronary stent failure is poorly established with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). We aimed to evaluate the risk of stent failure in patients with diabetes compared with those without diabetes after implantation of second-generation DES. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS All patients in Sweden who received second-generation DES between 2010 and 2020 were included and categorized into three groups: type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and without diabetes (reference group). The primary end point was stent failure, defined as in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by Cox regression models. Sensitivity analyses were performed to address missing data in covariates and account for death as a competing risk. RESULTS The study included 160,523 patients: 2,406 with type 1 diabetes, 43,377 with type 2 diabetes, and 114,740 without diabetes. Seventy-one percent were male. Over a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, 5,510 stent failure events occurred. The fully adjusted HR for stent failure was 2.28 (95% CI 1.97–2.65) for patients with type 1 and 1.35 (95% CI 1.27–1.44) for patients with type 2 diabetes, compared with individuals without diabetes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with both in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis contributing to the increased risk. CONCLUSIONS We observed a significantly higher risk of second-generation DES stent failure in individuals with type 1 diabetes followed by those with type 2 diabetes, compared with individuals without diabetes. This elevated risk was attributed to both in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis.
目的:目前尚不清楚第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)与糖尿病之间的关系。我们的目的是评估糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者在植入第二代DES后支架失效的风险。研究设计和方法纳入2010年至2020年间瑞典所有接受第二代DES的患者,并将其分为三组:1型糖尿病、2型糖尿病和无糖尿病(参照组)。主要终点是支架失效,定义为支架内再狭窄或支架血栓形成。采用Cox回归模型估计95% ci的校正风险比(hr)。进行敏感性分析以解决协变量中缺失的数据,并将死亡作为竞争风险考虑在内。结果:该研究纳入160523例患者:2406例1型糖尿病患者,43377例2型糖尿病患者,114740例无糖尿病患者。71%是男性。在平均4.5年的随访中,发生了5510例支架失效事件。与非糖尿病患者相比,1型糖尿病患者支架失效的完全校正HR为2.28 (95% CI 1.97-2.65), 2型糖尿病患者为1.35 (95% CI 1.27-1.44)。敏感性分析证实了研究结果的稳健性,支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成都增加了风险。结论:我们观察到,与非糖尿病患者相比,1型糖尿病患者和2型糖尿病患者发生第二代DES支架失效的风险明显更高。这种升高的风险归因于支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成。
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.