Agrarian Frames, Farm Financial Crisis, and Farmer Stress: A Qualitative Comparison of Small‐Scale Farmers

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1111/ruso.70030
Andrew R. Smolski, Michael D. Schulman, Juliene Porciuncula
{"title":"Agrarian Frames, Farm Financial Crisis, and Farmer Stress: A Qualitative Comparison of Small‐Scale Farmers","authors":"Andrew R. Smolski, Michael D. Schulman, Juliene Porciuncula","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies document the complex mental and physical health risks faced by farmers as a consequence of farm financial crises. The agrarian frames that farmers use to construct interpretations of events have been linked to stressors, barriers to care, and actions to navigate stress. In this study, we investigate how they frame the stress process through comparative analysis of interviews with 30 small‐scale farmer informants from three Southern states. Both Black and White respondents share a core, small‐scale agrarian frame that emphasizes the civic autonomy and sense of deprivation related to the scale of their farm operations. Black farmer participants described a racialized Black Agrarian frame overlapping with the small‐scale agrarian frame that centers around Black liberation and institutional racism. Alternatively, White farmers largely omit race from their framing of farm stress. The results enhance our understanding of the intersection among scale, race, and agrarian frames by providing a nuanced view of the relative differences between small‐scale farmers in their shared understandings of financial crises and farm stress. We conclude by highlighting the need for culturally informed mental health interventions and policies tailored to address the stressors and social narratives that characterize racially differentiated farming communities that also acknowledge the shared frame of small‐scale agrarianism.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies document the complex mental and physical health risks faced by farmers as a consequence of farm financial crises. The agrarian frames that farmers use to construct interpretations of events have been linked to stressors, barriers to care, and actions to navigate stress. In this study, we investigate how they frame the stress process through comparative analysis of interviews with 30 small‐scale farmer informants from three Southern states. Both Black and White respondents share a core, small‐scale agrarian frame that emphasizes the civic autonomy and sense of deprivation related to the scale of their farm operations. Black farmer participants described a racialized Black Agrarian frame overlapping with the small‐scale agrarian frame that centers around Black liberation and institutional racism. Alternatively, White farmers largely omit race from their framing of farm stress. The results enhance our understanding of the intersection among scale, race, and agrarian frames by providing a nuanced view of the relative differences between small‐scale farmers in their shared understandings of financial crises and farm stress. We conclude by highlighting the need for culturally informed mental health interventions and policies tailored to address the stressors and social narratives that characterize racially differentiated farming communities that also acknowledge the shared frame of small‐scale agrarianism.
农业框架、农业金融危机和农民压力:小农的定性比较
研究表明,由于农业金融危机,农民面临着复杂的精神和身体健康风险。农民用来解释事件的农业框架与压力源、护理障碍和应对压力的行动有关。在本研究中,我们通过对来自南方三个州的30名小规模农民的访谈进行比较分析,调查他们是如何构建压力过程的。黑人和白人受访者都有一个核心的小规模农业框架,强调与农场经营规模相关的公民自主权和剥夺感。黑人农民参与者描述了一个种族化的黑人农业框架,与以黑人解放和制度性种族主义为中心的小规模农业框架重叠。另外,白人农民在很大程度上忽略了种族问题。研究结果通过提供小规模农民对金融危机和农业压力的共同理解之间的相对差异的细微观点,增强了我们对规模、种族和农业框架之间交叉关系的理解。最后,我们强调需要有文化背景的心理健康干预措施和政策,以解决种族差异农业社区的压力源和社会叙事,这些压力源和社会叙事也承认小规模农业的共同框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RURAL SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书