Rectus diastasis repair with and without mesh at 1 year: randomized clinical trial.

IF 8.8
Reetta Tuominen, Julia Saxen, Tiina Jahkola, Jani Mikkonen, Jari Arokoski, Hannu Luomajoki, Jaana Vironen
{"title":"Rectus diastasis repair with and without mesh at 1 year: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Reetta Tuominen, Julia Saxen, Tiina Jahkola, Jani Mikkonen, Jari Arokoski, Hannu Luomajoki, Jaana Vironen","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectus diastasis (RD) can cause functional impairment and pain. Surgical approaches vary regarding mesh use for linea alba restoration. The aim of this RCT was to compare plication supported by mesh (PSUM) with suture plication in patients with symptomatic postpartum RD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre superiority double-blind RCT was conducted in Finland from April 2018 to November 2022. The pre-specified primary outcome was RD recurrence at 1 year (inter-rectus distance (IRD) >20 mm) and a post-hoc primary outcome was absolute reduction in IRD. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), low back disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), motor control, and complications. The date of the last follow-up was 30 November 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 86 normal-weight women (mean age of 38.7 (range 25-52) years) were randomized, with 84 patients (98%) available for follow-up (44 in the PSUM group and 40 in the suture plication group). At 1 year, there was no difference in RD recurrence between the PSUM group and the suture plication group (2 of 44 (5%) versus 2 of 40 (5%) respectively; P = 0.922). IRD reduction was greater in the PSUM group (52 (95% c.i. 48 to 56) mm) than in the suture plication group (44 (95% c.i. 40 to 47) mm) (P < 0.002). HRQoL, ODI, and enhanced performance test results all improved in both groups compared with baseline (P = 0.000-0.039). There was no difference in the complication rate between the PSUM group and the suture plication group (17 of 44 (39%) versus 13 of 40 (33%) respectively; P = 0.558).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 1 year, both PSUM and suture plication result in stable outcomes, with no difference in the RD recurrence rate, but the study was limited by both a small number of patients and a lower than anticipated overall RD recurrence rate. For the whole patient cohort, surgery was associated with improved motor control, low back function, and HRQoL compared with baseline.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT03509376 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":520792,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of surgery","volume":"112 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12646141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rectus diastasis (RD) can cause functional impairment and pain. Surgical approaches vary regarding mesh use for linea alba restoration. The aim of this RCT was to compare plication supported by mesh (PSUM) with suture plication in patients with symptomatic postpartum RD.

Methods: This single-centre superiority double-blind RCT was conducted in Finland from April 2018 to November 2022. The pre-specified primary outcome was RD recurrence at 1 year (inter-rectus distance (IRD) >20 mm) and a post-hoc primary outcome was absolute reduction in IRD. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), low back disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), motor control, and complications. The date of the last follow-up was 30 November 2022.

Results: In total, 86 normal-weight women (mean age of 38.7 (range 25-52) years) were randomized, with 84 patients (98%) available for follow-up (44 in the PSUM group and 40 in the suture plication group). At 1 year, there was no difference in RD recurrence between the PSUM group and the suture plication group (2 of 44 (5%) versus 2 of 40 (5%) respectively; P = 0.922). IRD reduction was greater in the PSUM group (52 (95% c.i. 48 to 56) mm) than in the suture plication group (44 (95% c.i. 40 to 47) mm) (P < 0.002). HRQoL, ODI, and enhanced performance test results all improved in both groups compared with baseline (P = 0.000-0.039). There was no difference in the complication rate between the PSUM group and the suture plication group (17 of 44 (39%) versus 13 of 40 (33%) respectively; P = 0.558).

Conclusion: At 1 year, both PSUM and suture plication result in stable outcomes, with no difference in the RD recurrence rate, but the study was limited by both a small number of patients and a lower than anticipated overall RD recurrence rate. For the whole patient cohort, surgery was associated with improved motor control, low back function, and HRQoL compared with baseline.

Registration number: NCT03509376 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用和不使用补片修复1年的直肌移位:随机临床试验。
背景:直肌转移(RD)可引起功能损害和疼痛。手术方法在使用补片修复白线方面有所不同。本随机对照试验的目的是比较补片支持应用(PSUM)与缝线应用在产后症状性rd患者中的应用。方法:该单中心优势双盲随机对照试验于2018年4月至2022年11月在芬兰进行。预先指定的主要结局是1年的RD复发(直肌间距(IRD)约20mm),事后的主要结局是IRD绝对减少。次要结局包括健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、腰背部残疾(Oswestry残疾指数(ODI))、运动控制和并发症。最后一次后续行动的日期是2022年11月30日。结果:86名体重正常的女性(平均年龄38.7岁(25-52岁))被随机分配,84例(98%)患者可随访(PSUM组44例,缝合组40例)。1年后,PSUM组和缝合组的RD复发率无差异(44例中有2例(5%),40例中有2例(5%);P = 0.922)。PSUM组的IRD减小幅度(52 (95% c.i. 48 ~ 56) mm)大于缝合组(44 (95% c.i. 40 ~ 47) mm) (P < 0.002)。两组HRQoL、ODI和增强性能测试结果均较基线有所改善(P = 0.000-0.039)。PSUM组与缝合组的并发症发生率无差异(44例中17例(39%)vs 40例中13例(33%);P = 0.558)。结论:在1年时,PSUM和缝合术的结果稳定,RD复发率没有差异,但由于患者数量少,RD总复发率低于预期,限制了研究。对于整个患者队列,与基线相比,手术与运动控制、腰背部功能和HRQoL的改善相关。注册号:NCT03509376 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书