Patient Perspectives on Health Insurance Design: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2025-11-14 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp13040056
Bridget Doherty, Kimberly Hooks, Ulrich Neumann, Wesley Peters, Steven Zona, Lisa Shea
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Health Insurance Design: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.","authors":"Bridget Doherty, Kimberly Hooks, Ulrich Neumann, Wesley Peters, Steven Zona, Lisa Shea","doi":"10.3390/jmahp13040056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There remains a persistent lack of patient-centered evidence on insurance reform and real-world experiences of patients with chronic disease. This study gathered insights around insurance design from chronic disease beneficiaries. This mixed-methods analysis comprised an online survey and virtual focus group sessions (August to December 2023) involving US residents with chronic disease and health insurance. Patients' perspectives on insurance design were explored. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. Key themes were identified from focus group transcripts and direct observations. In total, 146 patients across 15 chronic diseases completed the survey; 29 then participated in focus groups. Although most beneficiaries were satisfied with their health plan, concerns centered on prescription medication affordability due to high deductibles and cost exposure, the disproportionate effects of cost exposure based on income, and the unpredictability of out-of-pocket costs. For some, the financial burden led to financial debt, therapy abandonment, mental health issues, and/or worsening of their condition. Overall, there was broad support for policy solutions to redesign insurance and adjust cost exposure for patients with chronic disease. This research offers valuable patient insights into health insurance design in the US to ensure patients' needs are addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"13 4","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp13040056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There remains a persistent lack of patient-centered evidence on insurance reform and real-world experiences of patients with chronic disease. This study gathered insights around insurance design from chronic disease beneficiaries. This mixed-methods analysis comprised an online survey and virtual focus group sessions (August to December 2023) involving US residents with chronic disease and health insurance. Patients' perspectives on insurance design were explored. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. Key themes were identified from focus group transcripts and direct observations. In total, 146 patients across 15 chronic diseases completed the survey; 29 then participated in focus groups. Although most beneficiaries were satisfied with their health plan, concerns centered on prescription medication affordability due to high deductibles and cost exposure, the disproportionate effects of cost exposure based on income, and the unpredictability of out-of-pocket costs. For some, the financial burden led to financial debt, therapy abandonment, mental health issues, and/or worsening of their condition. Overall, there was broad support for policy solutions to redesign insurance and adjust cost exposure for patients with chronic disease. This research offers valuable patient insights into health insurance design in the US to ensure patients' needs are addressed.

病人对健康保险设计的看法:一项混合方法分析。
在保险改革和慢性病患者的现实世界经验方面,仍然缺乏以患者为中心的证据。这项研究从慢性病受益人那里收集了有关保险设计的见解。这项混合方法分析包括在线调查和虚拟焦点小组会议(2023年8月至12月),涉及患有慢性病和健康保险的美国居民。探讨患者对保险设计的看法。对调查数据进行描述性分析。从焦点小组记录和直接观察中确定了关键主题。共有15种慢性病的146名患者完成了调查;然后29人参加了焦点小组。虽然大多数受益人对他们的健康计划感到满意,但由于高免赔额和成本暴露,人们关注的焦点是处方药的可负担性,基于收入的成本暴露的不成比例的影响,以及自付费用的不可预测性。对一些人来说,经济负担导致财务债务、放弃治疗、精神健康问题和/或病情恶化。总体而言,对重新设计保险和调整慢性病患者的费用敞口的政策解决方案得到了广泛支持。这项研究为美国医疗保险设计提供了宝贵的患者见解,以确保患者的需求得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书