Older adults' preferences for features of medication adherence technologies: a preference elicitation study.

IF 3.2
BMC digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s44247-025-00222-z
Ghada Elba, Bincy Baby, Ryan H Griffin, Tejal Patel
{"title":"Older adults' preferences for features of medication adherence technologies: a preference elicitation study.","authors":"Ghada Elba, Bincy Baby, Ryan H Griffin, Tejal Patel","doi":"10.1186/s44247-025-00222-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults are at risk of medication non-adherence due to complex medication regimens and medication management challenges. Medication adherence technologies can help, but previous research demonstrates variability in usability and preferences of their features among older adults. Therefore, our objective is to examine older adults' preferences for medication adherence technology features and their trade-offs to guide the development of these technologies. This will facilitate serving older adults better by addressing their needs and preference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Framework, we conducted a questionnaire based preference elicitation study where older adults ranked 10 medication adherence technology features identified through qualitative interviews, then identified acceptable trade-offs. Recruitment of our sample was based on convenience sampling, and the inclusion criteria was older adults above 60 years and older and able to speak and read English. The ranking was evaluated by calculating the relative importance using relative importance index (RII) and the trade-offs were assessed using win rate analysis. Statistical significance was assessed using Kruskal Wallis analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty older adults were recruited, of which twenty-three (mean age 73 years, 47.8% males) participated. The 10 reported features were button size, screen size, device size, compartment division, setting time and alarm, alarm sound, user-friendly leaflet, battery operated, locking features, and number of steps to set up the device. Screen size was ranked highest with relative importance index (RII) of 0.75. Win-rate analysis of trade-offs revealed that a user-friendly leaflet was the most frequently selected feature with p value < 0.001 (Kruskal Wallis test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of understanding the preferences of older adults to guide selecting the medication adherence technology that better meet their needs, as well as developing tools supporting medication management and adherence.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-025-00222-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"3 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-025-00222-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults are at risk of medication non-adherence due to complex medication regimens and medication management challenges. Medication adherence technologies can help, but previous research demonstrates variability in usability and preferences of their features among older adults. Therefore, our objective is to examine older adults' preferences for medication adherence technology features and their trade-offs to guide the development of these technologies. This will facilitate serving older adults better by addressing their needs and preference.

Methods: Guided by the Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Framework, we conducted a questionnaire based preference elicitation study where older adults ranked 10 medication adherence technology features identified through qualitative interviews, then identified acceptable trade-offs. Recruitment of our sample was based on convenience sampling, and the inclusion criteria was older adults above 60 years and older and able to speak and read English. The ranking was evaluated by calculating the relative importance using relative importance index (RII) and the trade-offs were assessed using win rate analysis. Statistical significance was assessed using Kruskal Wallis analysis.

Results: Thirty older adults were recruited, of which twenty-three (mean age 73 years, 47.8% males) participated. The 10 reported features were button size, screen size, device size, compartment division, setting time and alarm, alarm sound, user-friendly leaflet, battery operated, locking features, and number of steps to set up the device. Screen size was ranked highest with relative importance index (RII) of 0.75. Win-rate analysis of trade-offs revealed that a user-friendly leaflet was the most frequently selected feature with p value < 0.001 (Kruskal Wallis test).

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of understanding the preferences of older adults to guide selecting the medication adherence technology that better meet their needs, as well as developing tools supporting medication management and adherence.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-025-00222-z.

老年人对药物依从性技术特征的偏好:偏好启发研究。
由于复杂的药物治疗方案和药物管理方面的挑战,老年人面临药物不依从性的风险。药物依从性技术可以提供帮助,但先前的研究表明,老年人对其功能的可用性和偏好存在差异。因此,我们的目标是研究老年人对药物依从性技术特征的偏好及其权衡,以指导这些技术的发展。这将有助于通过满足老年人的需求和偏好,更好地为他们服务。方法:在以患者为中心的利益-风险框架的指导下,我们进行了一项基于问卷的偏好启发研究,在该研究中,老年人通过定性访谈对10种药物依从性技术特征进行了排名,然后确定了可接受的权衡。我们的样本招募基于方便抽样,纳入标准是60岁及以上的老年人,能够说和读英语。通过使用相对重要性指数(RII)计算相对重要性来评估排名,并使用胜率分析来评估权衡。采用Kruskal - Wallis分析评估统计学显著性。结果:招募了30名老年人,其中23人参加,平均年龄73岁,男性47.8%。报告的10个特征是按钮大小、屏幕大小、设备大小、隔间划分、设置时间和警报、警报声音、用户友好传单、电池供电、锁定功能和设置设备的步骤数。屏幕尺寸排名最高,相对重要性指数(RII)为0.75。结论:本研究强调了了解老年人的偏好对于指导选择更符合其需求的药物依从性技术以及开发支持药物管理和依从性的工具的重要性。临床试验号:不适用。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1186/s44247-025-00222-z获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书