{"title":"Facility Acquisition and Care Quality in the U.S. Dialysis Industry.","authors":"Ilana Segal, Truc Bui, Yu Liu, Kevin Callison","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether acquisition of independent dialysis facilities by large chains is associated with changes in clinical quality metrics and patient-reported experiences of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using 2016-2020 data from Medicare Dialysis Facility Care Compare (DFC) and In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS). Facility acquisition was defined as the transition of a nonchain-owned facility to chain ownership. We estimated within-facility changes in clinical and patient-reported outcomes after acquisition using linear regression with facility and year fixed effects, adjusting for ownership type and facility size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,627 facilities in the DFC sample and 1,377 in the ICH-CAHPS sample, acquisition was associated with a 3.0% relative increase in hospitalization rates, a 9.4% increase in infection rates, and a 0.5% decline in dialysis adequacy. Patient-reported experiences showed a statistically significant 1.0% decline in reported information sharing while other experience metrics trended negatively but were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facility acquisition was associated with worsening clinical performance and small declines in patient experience. These findings suggest consolidation may negatively affect dialysis care quality, underscoring the need for closer oversight of industry mergers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether acquisition of independent dialysis facilities by large chains is associated with changes in clinical quality metrics and patient-reported experiences of care.
Methods: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using 2016-2020 data from Medicare Dialysis Facility Care Compare (DFC) and In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS). Facility acquisition was defined as the transition of a nonchain-owned facility to chain ownership. We estimated within-facility changes in clinical and patient-reported outcomes after acquisition using linear regression with facility and year fixed effects, adjusting for ownership type and facility size.
Results: Among 4,627 facilities in the DFC sample and 1,377 in the ICH-CAHPS sample, acquisition was associated with a 3.0% relative increase in hospitalization rates, a 9.4% increase in infection rates, and a 0.5% decline in dialysis adequacy. Patient-reported experiences showed a statistically significant 1.0% decline in reported information sharing while other experience metrics trended negatively but were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Facility acquisition was associated with worsening clinical performance and small declines in patient experience. These findings suggest consolidation may negatively affect dialysis care quality, underscoring the need for closer oversight of industry mergers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform