Phantom Scanning in Point-of-Care Ultrasound After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Impact of Clinical Presentation in a Single-Center Analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.10.004
Riley Westein, Lauren Nickel, Mary Beth Phelan
{"title":"Phantom Scanning in Point-of-Care Ultrasound After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Impact of Clinical Presentation in a Single-Center Analysis","authors":"Riley Westein,&nbsp;Lauren Nickel,&nbsp;Mary Beth Phelan","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phantom scanning, defined as the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) without image archiving, occurs frequently in cardiac arrest and carries clinical, legal, and quality improvement consequences. Its association with clinical presentation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the prevalence of phantom scanning in OHCA, stratified by clinical presentation and emergency department (ED) disposition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of adult patients presenting with atraumatic OHCA. The primary outcome was phantom scanning among patients presenting with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in progress versus return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcome compared phantom scanning between admitted patients versus those who died in the ED. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals evaluated associations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 306 patients reviewed, 244 met inclusion criteria. POCUS was more likely with CPR in progress (OR = 3.58, 95% CI [2.08, 6.26], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Among patients who underwent POCUS, phantom scanning was more frequent with CPR in progress (OR = 3.15, 95% CI [1.49, 6.84], <em>p</em> = 0.002). POCUS was less likely among admitted patients (OR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.21, 0.66], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and phantom scanning was less common in this group (OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.11, 0.47], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Differences in POCUS use and phantom scanning were significant by both presentation and disposition (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Phantom scanning occurred more often in OHCA patients with CPR in progress and in those who died in the ED. Future research should focus on strategies to reduce phantom scanning and promote adherence to POCUS best practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"Pages 187-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925003956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Phantom scanning, defined as the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) without image archiving, occurs frequently in cardiac arrest and carries clinical, legal, and quality improvement consequences. Its association with clinical presentation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains understudied.

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence of phantom scanning in OHCA, stratified by clinical presentation and emergency department (ED) disposition.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of adult patients presenting with atraumatic OHCA. The primary outcome was phantom scanning among patients presenting with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in progress versus return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcome compared phantom scanning between admitted patients versus those who died in the ED. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals evaluated associations.

Results

Of 306 patients reviewed, 244 met inclusion criteria. POCUS was more likely with CPR in progress (OR = 3.58, 95% CI [2.08, 6.26], p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent POCUS, phantom scanning was more frequent with CPR in progress (OR = 3.15, 95% CI [1.49, 6.84], p = 0.002). POCUS was less likely among admitted patients (OR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.21, 0.66], p < 0.001), and phantom scanning was less common in this group (OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.11, 0.47], p < 0.001). Differences in POCUS use and phantom scanning were significant by both presentation and disposition (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Phantom scanning occurred more often in OHCA patients with CPR in progress and in those who died in the ED. Future research should focus on strategies to reduce phantom scanning and promote adherence to POCUS best practices.
院外心脏骤停后即时超声的幻像扫描:单中心分析对临床表现的影响
背景:幻像扫描,定义为使用无图像存档的即时超声(POCUS),经常发生在心脏骤停中,并具有临床、法律和质量改善的后果。其与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后临床表现的关系仍未得到充分研究。目的:评估幻影扫描在OHCA中的流行程度,并根据临床表现和急诊科(ED)处理进行分层。方法:我们对出现非外伤性OHCA的成年患者进行了回顾性、单中心研究。主要结果是在正在进行心肺复苏(CPR)的患者与恢复自然循环(ROSC)的患者中进行幻肢扫描。次要结果比较了住院患者和急诊死亡患者的幻影扫描。描述性统计、卡方检验和95%置信区间的比值比评估了相关性。结果:306例患者中,244例符合纳入标准。心肺复苏术进行时POCUS发生的可能性更大(OR = 3.58, 95% CI [2.08, 6.26], p < 0.001)。在接受POCUS的患者中,正在进行心肺复苏的患者更频繁地进行幻肢扫描(OR = 3.15, 95% CI [1.49, 6.84], p = 0.002)。入院患者的POCUS发生率较低(OR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.21, 0.66], p < 0.001),且本组患者的幻像扫描发生率较低(OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.11, 0.47], p < 0.001)。POCUS的使用和幻影扫描在表现和处置上都有显著差异(p < 0.001)。结论:幻像扫描在正在进行CPR的OHCA患者和死于ED的患者中更常见。未来的研究应侧重于减少幻像扫描的策略,并促进对POCUS最佳实践的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书