Cut or bind? Antigen-specific processing mechanisms define CD4+ T cell immunodominant epitopes for SARS-CoV-2 S and N proteins.

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Miguel Álvaro-Benito, Esam T Abualrous, Holger Lingel, Stefan Meltendorf, Jakob Holzapfel, Paula de Diego Valera, Jana Sticht, Benno Kuropka, Cecilia Clementi, Frank Kuppler, Monika C Brunner-Weinzierl, Christian Freund
{"title":"Cut or bind? Antigen-specific processing mechanisms define CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell immunodominant epitopes for SARS-CoV-2 S and N proteins.","authors":"Miguel Álvaro-Benito, Esam T Abualrous, Holger Lingel, Stefan Meltendorf, Jakob Holzapfel, Paula de Diego Valera, Jana Sticht, Benno Kuropka, Cecilia Clementi, Frank Kuppler, Monika C Brunner-Weinzierl, Christian Freund","doi":"10.1186/s13073-025-01577-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CD4⁺ T cell responses are key to adaptive immunity, yet the mechanisms underlying peptide selection and immunodominance across MHC class II variants in humans remain poorly defined. Two non-mutually exclusive models - First Bind-then cut (FBtc) and First Cut-then bind (FCtb) - have been proposed to explain immunodominant peptide selection, but experimental evidence in humans is mostly limited to a single allotype (HLA-DRB1*01:01).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To generalize processing mechanisms across DRB1 alleles we developed an integrative strategy combining in silico prediction and a reconstituted antigen processing system. The independent and combined outcome of both approaches was validated on curated SARS-CoV-2 epitope data (IEDB) for responses to the Spike and Nucleocapsid proteins across a panel of 11 DRB1 allotypes, covering over 90% of European Caucasian populations. Potential immunogenic regions identified by the combination of both methods enabled the design of minimalistic peptide pools whose performance was validated via flow cytometry and ELISpot assays in post-Covid19 and pre-pandemic donors. Mechanistic insights for the selection of immunodominant peptides were derived analyzing biophysical parameters and proteolysis of the model antigens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three prediction tools used showed limited concordance for some allotypes (< 5%), but their combined output for all allotypes considered revealed potential immunogenic hotspots in the model antigens. Complementary, the reconstituted in vitro system identified allotype-dependent and promiscuous peptide candidates. Minimal peptide pools designed from the overlap of both methods featured improved performance to identify IEDB entries and induced robust CD4⁺ T cell activation in post-COVID-19 donors. Mechanistic modeling classified most immunodominant peptides from the Spike protein as arising via FCtb while FBtc predominated for Nucleocapsid. Epitope selection pathways are therefore antigen-dependent defined by proteolytic resistance and solvent accessibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We establish a scalable, genomics-informed framework for decoding CD4⁺ T cell immunodominance across diverse HLA contexts. Our findings reveal that antigen-intrinsic features govern the preferential processing pathway - FCtb for Spike and FBtc for Nucleocapsid - and validate the utility of minimal peptide pools for population-level immune-monitoring. These insights inform the design of personalized immunotherapies and broadly effective vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12676865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01577-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CD4⁺ T cell responses are key to adaptive immunity, yet the mechanisms underlying peptide selection and immunodominance across MHC class II variants in humans remain poorly defined. Two non-mutually exclusive models - First Bind-then cut (FBtc) and First Cut-then bind (FCtb) - have been proposed to explain immunodominant peptide selection, but experimental evidence in humans is mostly limited to a single allotype (HLA-DRB1*01:01).

Methods: To generalize processing mechanisms across DRB1 alleles we developed an integrative strategy combining in silico prediction and a reconstituted antigen processing system. The independent and combined outcome of both approaches was validated on curated SARS-CoV-2 epitope data (IEDB) for responses to the Spike and Nucleocapsid proteins across a panel of 11 DRB1 allotypes, covering over 90% of European Caucasian populations. Potential immunogenic regions identified by the combination of both methods enabled the design of minimalistic peptide pools whose performance was validated via flow cytometry and ELISpot assays in post-Covid19 and pre-pandemic donors. Mechanistic insights for the selection of immunodominant peptides were derived analyzing biophysical parameters and proteolysis of the model antigens.

Results: Three prediction tools used showed limited concordance for some allotypes (< 5%), but their combined output for all allotypes considered revealed potential immunogenic hotspots in the model antigens. Complementary, the reconstituted in vitro system identified allotype-dependent and promiscuous peptide candidates. Minimal peptide pools designed from the overlap of both methods featured improved performance to identify IEDB entries and induced robust CD4⁺ T cell activation in post-COVID-19 donors. Mechanistic modeling classified most immunodominant peptides from the Spike protein as arising via FCtb while FBtc predominated for Nucleocapsid. Epitope selection pathways are therefore antigen-dependent defined by proteolytic resistance and solvent accessibility.

Conclusions: We establish a scalable, genomics-informed framework for decoding CD4⁺ T cell immunodominance across diverse HLA contexts. Our findings reveal that antigen-intrinsic features govern the preferential processing pathway - FCtb for Spike and FBtc for Nucleocapsid - and validate the utility of minimal peptide pools for population-level immune-monitoring. These insights inform the design of personalized immunotherapies and broadly effective vaccines.

剪还是绑?抗原特异性加工机制定义了SARS-CoV-2 S和N蛋白的CD4+ T细胞免疫优势表位。
背景:CD4 + T细胞反应是适应性免疫的关键,然而人类MHC II类变异中肽选择和免疫优势的机制仍然不清楚。两种不相互排斥的模型- First bind -then - cut (FBtc)和First cut -then - bind (FCtb) -被提出来解释免疫优势肽选择,但人类的实验证据大多局限于单一同种异型(HLA-DRB1*01:01)。方法:为了概括DRB1等位基因的加工机制,我们开发了一种结合计算机预测和重组抗原加工系统的综合策略。两种方法的独立和联合结果在精心设计的SARS-CoV-2表位数据(IEDB)上进行了验证,以确定11种DRB1同种异体对Spike和核衣壳蛋白的反应,覆盖了90%以上的欧洲高加索人群。通过两种方法的结合确定潜在的免疫原性区域,设计了极简肽池,其性能通过流式细胞术和ELISpot检测在covid - 19后和大流行前的供体中得到验证。通过分析模型抗原的生物物理参数和蛋白水解,获得了免疫优势肽选择的机制见解。结果:使用的三种预测工具在一些同种异体中显示出有限的一致性(结论:我们建立了一个可扩展的、基因组学知情的框架,用于解码CD4 + T细胞在不同HLA背景下的免疫优势。我们的研究结果表明,抗原的内在特征决定了优先加工途径——穗蛋白的FCtb和核衣壳的FBtc——并验证了最小肽库在群体水平免疫监测中的效用。这些见解为设计个性化免疫疗法和广泛有效的疫苗提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书