Eccentric cycling for chronic respiratory disease: Does helmet ventilation add value? A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1177/14799731251404870
Ke-Yun Chao, Wei-Lun Liu, Hui-Wen Hsu, Hsin-Cheng Chen, Ai Yin Lim, Jong-Shyan Wang
{"title":"Eccentric cycling for chronic respiratory disease: Does helmet ventilation add value? A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ke-Yun Chao, Wei-Lun Liu, Hui-Wen Hsu, Hsin-Cheng Chen, Ai Yin Lim, Jong-Shyan Wang","doi":"10.1177/14799731251404870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic respiratory diseases frequently cause a decrease in physical activity and lower exercise tolerance. Eccentric Cycling Training (ECT) offers a potential rehabilitation strategy. However, its effectiveness when combined with Helmet Ventilation (HV) is not fully established.MethodsThis nonblinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the effects of ECT with or without HV in individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. Participants were randomly assigned to the ECT, ECT-HV, or control group and underwent graded exercise testing. The ECT sessions spanned 9 weeks with gradually increasing intensity. The primary outcome was peak oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2peak</sub>). Secondary outcomes included functional tests and symptom scores.ResultsForty-four patients with chronic respiratory diseases were enrolled and divided among the ECT (n = 13), ECT-HV (n = 15), and control (n = 13) groups. After 9 weeks, significant improvements in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, energy expenditure index during the 6MWT, and timed up and go test were observed in both the ECT and ECT-HV groups compared to the control group. Reductions in initially high Borg leg fatigue were noted over time in these groups. VO<sub>2peak</sub> at follow-up was 17.6 ± 2.9 ml/min/kg in the control group, 17.2 ± 4.5 ml/min/kg in the ECT group, and 18.2 ± 3.9 ml/min/kg in the ECT-HV group, with no significant differences among groups. No significant differences in achieving the targeted exercise intensity were found between the ECT and ECT-HV groups.ConclusionsOver a 9-week period, eccentric cycling training improved functional capacity and mobility in patients with chronic respiratory diseases, although no significant changes were observed in peak oxygen consumption or overall cardiopulmonary fitness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251404870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251404870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChronic respiratory diseases frequently cause a decrease in physical activity and lower exercise tolerance. Eccentric Cycling Training (ECT) offers a potential rehabilitation strategy. However, its effectiveness when combined with Helmet Ventilation (HV) is not fully established.MethodsThis nonblinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the effects of ECT with or without HV in individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. Participants were randomly assigned to the ECT, ECT-HV, or control group and underwent graded exercise testing. The ECT sessions spanned 9 weeks with gradually increasing intensity. The primary outcome was peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Secondary outcomes included functional tests and symptom scores.ResultsForty-four patients with chronic respiratory diseases were enrolled and divided among the ECT (n = 13), ECT-HV (n = 15), and control (n = 13) groups. After 9 weeks, significant improvements in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, energy expenditure index during the 6MWT, and timed up and go test were observed in both the ECT and ECT-HV groups compared to the control group. Reductions in initially high Borg leg fatigue were noted over time in these groups. VO2peak at follow-up was 17.6 ± 2.9 ml/min/kg in the control group, 17.2 ± 4.5 ml/min/kg in the ECT group, and 18.2 ± 3.9 ml/min/kg in the ECT-HV group, with no significant differences among groups. No significant differences in achieving the targeted exercise intensity were found between the ECT and ECT-HV groups.ConclusionsOver a 9-week period, eccentric cycling training improved functional capacity and mobility in patients with chronic respiratory diseases, although no significant changes were observed in peak oxygen consumption or overall cardiopulmonary fitness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

慢性呼吸系统疾病的偏心骑行:头盔通气是否有价值?一项随机对照试验。
慢性呼吸系统疾病经常导致身体活动减少和运动耐受性降低。古怪自行车训练(ECT)提供了一种潜在的康复策略。然而,当与头盔通风(HV)结合使用时,其有效性尚未完全确定。方法采用非盲法随机对照试验(RCT),研究伴或不伴HV的电痉挛治疗对慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的疗效。参与者被随机分配到ECT组、ECT- hv组或对照组,并进行了分级运动测试。电痉挛治疗持续9周,强度逐渐增加。主要终点为峰值耗氧量(vo2峰值)。次要结果包括功能测试和症状评分。结果共纳入44例慢性呼吸系统疾病患者,分为ECT组(n = 13)、ECT- hv组(n = 15)和对照组(n = 13)。9周后,与对照组相比,ECT组和ECT- hv组在6分钟步行测试(6MWT)距离、6MWT期间的能量消耗指数、计时和行走测试方面均有显著改善。随着时间的推移,这些组中最初的高度博格腿疲劳有所减少。对照组随访时vo2峰值为17.6±2.9 ml/min/kg, ECT组为17.2±4.5 ml/min/kg, ECT- hv组为18.2±3.9 ml/min/kg,各组间差异无统计学意义。ECT组和ECT- hv组在达到目标运动强度方面没有显著差异。结论在9周的时间内,偏心自行车训练改善了慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的功能能力和活动能力,但在峰值耗氧量或整体心肺健康方面没有明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书