Understanding the reach of an evidence-based public health intervention to optimise nutrition and movement behaviour at scale: The INFANT Program

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
R. Laws , P. Love , P. Mehdipour , L. Orellana , K. Campbell , M. Adam , E. Denney-Wilson , H. Cheng , R. Gelman , S. Marshall , H. Koorts , E. Ganakas , V. Brown , J. McWhinnie , V. Graham , F. Mitchell , J. Browne , K.D. Hesketh
{"title":"Understanding the reach of an evidence-based public health intervention to optimise nutrition and movement behaviour at scale: The INFANT Program","authors":"R. Laws ,&nbsp;P. Love ,&nbsp;P. Mehdipour ,&nbsp;L. Orellana ,&nbsp;K. Campbell ,&nbsp;M. Adam ,&nbsp;E. Denney-Wilson ,&nbsp;H. Cheng ,&nbsp;R. Gelman ,&nbsp;S. Marshall ,&nbsp;H. Koorts ,&nbsp;E. Ganakas ,&nbsp;V. Brown ,&nbsp;J. McWhinnie ,&nbsp;V. Graham ,&nbsp;F. Mitchell ,&nbsp;J. Browne ,&nbsp;K.D. Hesketh","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2025.100288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the equitable reach of INFANT, an evidence-based early life nutrition and movement behaviour program when scaled up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>INFANT, comprising a free app and practitioner-led groups, was offered across Victoria, Australia, from 2021. Practitioner training was tracked via records, and caregiver participation measured through an app survey. Program reach was estimated per 1000 births in each local government area (LGA). Logistic regression models identified factors associated with group enrolment/attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>By November 2024, INFANT groups were offered in 48 (61%) Victorian LGAs and the app was used in 78 (99%) reaching 11,358 caregivers. LGAs with higher rates of practitioners trained achieved better program reach. Compared to Victorian women of reproductive age, a higher proportion of INFANT participants were university educated, English speaking, from advantaged communities and outside major cities. In LGAs offering both program components, group enrolment/attendance was higher among first-time parents, those practicing mixed feeding, living in disadvantaged communities and outside major cities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>INFANT achieved high reach, with group sessions reaching more disadvantaged parents. Efforts continue to expand reach for priority groups.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><div>This is the first study to assess the equitable reach of an early life health promotion program at scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"49 6","pages":"Article 100288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020025000706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe the equitable reach of INFANT, an evidence-based early life nutrition and movement behaviour program when scaled up.

Methods

INFANT, comprising a free app and practitioner-led groups, was offered across Victoria, Australia, from 2021. Practitioner training was tracked via records, and caregiver participation measured through an app survey. Program reach was estimated per 1000 births in each local government area (LGA). Logistic regression models identified factors associated with group enrolment/attendance.

Results

By November 2024, INFANT groups were offered in 48 (61%) Victorian LGAs and the app was used in 78 (99%) reaching 11,358 caregivers. LGAs with higher rates of practitioners trained achieved better program reach. Compared to Victorian women of reproductive age, a higher proportion of INFANT participants were university educated, English speaking, from advantaged communities and outside major cities. In LGAs offering both program components, group enrolment/attendance was higher among first-time parents, those practicing mixed feeding, living in disadvantaged communities and outside major cities.

Conclusions

INFANT achieved high reach, with group sessions reaching more disadvantaged parents. Efforts continue to expand reach for priority groups.

Implications for Public Health

This is the first study to assess the equitable reach of an early life health promotion program at scale.
了解以证据为基础的公共卫生干预的范围,以大规模优化营养和运动行为:婴儿计划。
目的:描述婴儿,一个以证据为基础的早期生命营养和运动行为项目的公平覆盖范围。方法:从2021年开始,在澳大利亚维多利亚州提供由免费应用程序和医生领导的小组组成的INFANT。通过记录跟踪从业者培训,通过应用程序调查衡量护理人员的参与情况。在每个地方政府辖区,每1000名新生儿中估计方案覆盖率。逻辑回归模型确定了与小组入学/出勤率相关的因素。结果:到2024年11月,维多利亚州48个(61%)lga提供了婴儿组,78个(99%)使用了该应用程序,覆盖了11,358名护理人员。从业人员培训率较高的地方政府机构实现了更好的项目覆盖。与维多利亚时期的育龄妇女相比,接受过大学教育、会说英语、来自优越社区和大城市以外地区的婴儿参与者比例更高。在提供这两个项目组成部分的地方政府机构中,首次父母、实行混合喂养、生活在弱势社区和大城市以外地区的人的团体入学率/出勤率更高。结论:婴儿获得了较高的可及性,小组会议接触到更多的弱势父母。继续努力扩大优先群体的覆盖面。对公众健康的影响:这是第一项大规模评估早期生活健康促进计划的公平范围的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书