R. Laws , P. Love , P. Mehdipour , L. Orellana , K. Campbell , M. Adam , E. Denney-Wilson , H. Cheng , R. Gelman , S. Marshall , H. Koorts , E. Ganakas , V. Brown , J. McWhinnie , V. Graham , F. Mitchell , J. Browne , K.D. Hesketh
{"title":"Understanding the reach of an evidence-based public health intervention to optimise nutrition and movement behaviour at scale: The INFANT Program","authors":"R. Laws , P. Love , P. Mehdipour , L. Orellana , K. Campbell , M. Adam , E. Denney-Wilson , H. Cheng , R. Gelman , S. Marshall , H. Koorts , E. Ganakas , V. Brown , J. McWhinnie , V. Graham , F. Mitchell , J. Browne , K.D. Hesketh","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2025.100288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the equitable reach of INFANT, an evidence-based early life nutrition and movement behaviour program when scaled up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>INFANT, comprising a free app and practitioner-led groups, was offered across Victoria, Australia, from 2021. Practitioner training was tracked via records, and caregiver participation measured through an app survey. Program reach was estimated per 1000 births in each local government area (LGA). Logistic regression models identified factors associated with group enrolment/attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>By November 2024, INFANT groups were offered in 48 (61%) Victorian LGAs and the app was used in 78 (99%) reaching 11,358 caregivers. LGAs with higher rates of practitioners trained achieved better program reach. Compared to Victorian women of reproductive age, a higher proportion of INFANT participants were university educated, English speaking, from advantaged communities and outside major cities. In LGAs offering both program components, group enrolment/attendance was higher among first-time parents, those practicing mixed feeding, living in disadvantaged communities and outside major cities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>INFANT achieved high reach, with group sessions reaching more disadvantaged parents. Efforts continue to expand reach for priority groups.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><div>This is the first study to assess the equitable reach of an early life health promotion program at scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"49 6","pages":"Article 100288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020025000706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe the equitable reach of INFANT, an evidence-based early life nutrition and movement behaviour program when scaled up.
Methods
INFANT, comprising a free app and practitioner-led groups, was offered across Victoria, Australia, from 2021. Practitioner training was tracked via records, and caregiver participation measured through an app survey. Program reach was estimated per 1000 births in each local government area (LGA). Logistic regression models identified factors associated with group enrolment/attendance.
Results
By November 2024, INFANT groups were offered in 48 (61%) Victorian LGAs and the app was used in 78 (99%) reaching 11,358 caregivers. LGAs with higher rates of practitioners trained achieved better program reach. Compared to Victorian women of reproductive age, a higher proportion of INFANT participants were university educated, English speaking, from advantaged communities and outside major cities. In LGAs offering both program components, group enrolment/attendance was higher among first-time parents, those practicing mixed feeding, living in disadvantaged communities and outside major cities.
Conclusions
INFANT achieved high reach, with group sessions reaching more disadvantaged parents. Efforts continue to expand reach for priority groups.
Implications for Public Health
This is the first study to assess the equitable reach of an early life health promotion program at scale.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.