Accuracy of a point-of-care CoaguChek test versus standard laboratory coagulation monitoring in cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass: randomized clinical trial

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844714
Fabrício Tavares Mendonça, Sérgio Honorato de Matos, Larissa Goveia Moreira, Igor Louza Pereira, Lorenzo Leite Dino, Matheus Beserra Braga, Gustavo Henrique dos Santos Dias
{"title":"Accuracy of a point-of-care CoaguChek test versus standard laboratory coagulation monitoring in cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass: randomized clinical trial","authors":"Fabrício Tavares Mendonça,&nbsp;Sérgio Honorato de Matos,&nbsp;Larissa Goveia Moreira,&nbsp;Igor Louza Pereira,&nbsp;Lorenzo Leite Dino,&nbsp;Matheus Beserra Braga,&nbsp;Gustavo Henrique dos Santos Dias","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intraoperative coagulopathies are common in complex surgeries, and timely coagulation monitoring is crucial. We assessed the accuracy of the point-of-care CoaguChek XS test against standard laboratory measurements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center, diagnostic accuracy study to assess the coagulation profile of 50 participants before and after CPB. The index test was the CoaguChek XS device and the reference test was the standard laboratory assay. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the CoaguChek device in measuring the International Normalized Ratio (INR). We pre-specified a tolerance range of ± 0.5 INR units. Secondary outcomes included accuracy in measuring prothrombin time and prothrombin activity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB between October 2023 and January 2024. The mean (standard deviation) age was 59.2 (12.3) years, and 32 participants (64%) were male. For INR values, Lin’s coefficient was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60‒0.82) pre-CPB and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.50‒0.77) post-CPB, both indicating good agreement. In the pre-CPB period, on average, the index test readings exceeded reference readings by 0.045 INR units (95% CI: 0.030‒0.059, p &lt; 0.001), while in post-CPB period, index readings were, on average, 0.064 INR units lower (95% CI: -0.09 to -0.04, p &lt; 0.001). Although statistically significant differences were observed, they fell within predefined tolerance range and were considered clinically irrelevant. Analyses of secondary outcomes were consistent with the primary outcome findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, CoaguChek XS provided results comparable to standard laboratory coagulation monitoring, both pre-and post-cardiopulmonary bypass.</div></div><div><h3>Research Board Approval</h3><div>Plataforma Brasil CAAE 70266023.8.0000.5553.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trials Registration</h3><div>(<span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06037720</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) NCT06037720, 14/09/2023.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"76 2","pages":"Article 844714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425001290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative coagulopathies are common in complex surgeries, and timely coagulation monitoring is crucial. We assessed the accuracy of the point-of-care CoaguChek XS test against standard laboratory measurements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB).

Methods

We conducted a single-center, diagnostic accuracy study to assess the coagulation profile of 50 participants before and after CPB. The index test was the CoaguChek XS device and the reference test was the standard laboratory assay. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the CoaguChek device in measuring the International Normalized Ratio (INR). We pre-specified a tolerance range of ± 0.5 INR units. Secondary outcomes included accuracy in measuring prothrombin time and prothrombin activity.

Results

We included 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB between October 2023 and January 2024. The mean (standard deviation) age was 59.2 (12.3) years, and 32 participants (64%) were male. For INR values, Lin’s coefficient was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60‒0.82) pre-CPB and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.50‒0.77) post-CPB, both indicating good agreement. In the pre-CPB period, on average, the index test readings exceeded reference readings by 0.045 INR units (95% CI: 0.030‒0.059, p < 0.001), while in post-CPB period, index readings were, on average, 0.064 INR units lower (95% CI: -0.09 to -0.04, p < 0.001). Although statistically significant differences were observed, they fell within predefined tolerance range and were considered clinically irrelevant. Analyses of secondary outcomes were consistent with the primary outcome findings.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, CoaguChek XS provided results comparable to standard laboratory coagulation monitoring, both pre-and post-cardiopulmonary bypass.

Research Board Approval

Plataforma Brasil CAAE 70266023.8.0000.5553.

Clinical Trials Registration

(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06037720) NCT06037720, 14/09/2023.
在涉及体外循环的心脏手术中,即时CoaguCheck检测与标准实验室凝血监测的准确性随机临床试验。
背景:术中凝血功能障碍在复杂手术中很常见,及时监测凝血功能至关重要。我们对接受心脏手术合并体外循环(CPB)患者的即时护理CoaguChek XS测试与标准实验室测量的准确性进行了评估。方法:我们进行了一项单中心诊断准确性研究,评估50名参与者在CPB前后的凝血状况。指标试验为CoaguChek XS装置,参比试验为标准实验室检测。主要结果是CoaguChek装置测量国际标准化比率(INR)的准确性。我们预先规定了±0.5 INR单位的公差范围。次要结果包括测量凝血酶原时间和凝血酶原活性的准确性。结果:我们纳入了2023年10月至2024年1月期间接受CPB心脏手术的50例患者。平均(标准差)年龄为59.2(12.3)岁,32名参与者(64%)为男性。对于INR值,cpb前的Lin’s系数为0.72 (95% CI: 0.60-0.82), cpb后的Lin’s系数为0.66 (95% CI: 0.50-0.77),两者吻合良好。在cpb前,指数测试读数平均超过参考读数0.045个INR单位(95% CI: 0.030-0.059, p < 0.001),而在cpb后时期,指数读数平均低0.064个INR单位(95% CI: -0.09至-0.04,p < 0.001)。虽然观察到统计学上的显著差异,但它们落在预定的耐受范围内,被认为与临床无关。次要结局分析与主要结局结果一致。结论:在接受心脏手术合并体外循环的患者中,CoaguChek XS提供的结果与体外循环术前和术后的标准实验室凝血监测相当。临床试验注册:(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06037720) NCT06037720, 2023年9月14日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书