{"title":"“Good Old Boys From Good Old Families”: Rural Criminal–Legal Involvements and the Reproduction of Social Inequality","authors":"Jennifer Sherman, Jennifer Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we draw upon 71 in‐depth interviews to explore an under‐researched aspect of the criminal–legal experience as it pertains to reproduction of inequality: interactions of symbolic resources including social and moral capital with criminal–legal trajectories in rural communities. We find that rural communities can provide significant support to residents when caught in legal transgressions, minimizing both trauma and long‐term impacts. But for those who lack resources, whether due to shorter residencies, marginalized race and/or class statuses, or stained local reputations, communities can provide a combination of low support and high visibility that amplifies negative impacts. We highlight the complexity of rural criminal‐legal system involvements and social dynamics that minimize or exacerbate their impacts. We focus on multiple aspects of the postarrest experience for those who have been in rural jails, including external judgments and internalization of stigma; visibility and surveillance that amplify negative impacts; and the roles of intersectional (dis)advantages. We illustrate the ways in which these interlocking internal and external mechanisms serve to reinforce and reproduce existing inequalities, finding that these undertheorized social processes contribute profoundly to dynamics in which communities take care of their better‐off residents while further marginalizing those who are most vulnerable.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we draw upon 71 in‐depth interviews to explore an under‐researched aspect of the criminal–legal experience as it pertains to reproduction of inequality: interactions of symbolic resources including social and moral capital with criminal–legal trajectories in rural communities. We find that rural communities can provide significant support to residents when caught in legal transgressions, minimizing both trauma and long‐term impacts. But for those who lack resources, whether due to shorter residencies, marginalized race and/or class statuses, or stained local reputations, communities can provide a combination of low support and high visibility that amplifies negative impacts. We highlight the complexity of rural criminal‐legal system involvements and social dynamics that minimize or exacerbate their impacts. We focus on multiple aspects of the postarrest experience for those who have been in rural jails, including external judgments and internalization of stigma; visibility and surveillance that amplify negative impacts; and the roles of intersectional (dis)advantages. We illustrate the ways in which these interlocking internal and external mechanisms serve to reinforce and reproduce existing inequalities, finding that these undertheorized social processes contribute profoundly to dynamics in which communities take care of their better‐off residents while further marginalizing those who are most vulnerable.
期刊介绍:
A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.