Evaluating correctness, performance and energy footprint of semantic reasoners in mobile edge computing

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Journal of Systems and Software Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112696
Ivano Bilenchi, Davide Loconte, Floriano Scioscia, Michele Ruta
{"title":"Evaluating correctness, performance and energy footprint of semantic reasoners in mobile edge computing","authors":"Ivano Bilenchi,&nbsp;Davide Loconte,&nbsp;Floriano Scioscia,&nbsp;Michele Ruta","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of Semantic Web technologies into Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) platforms is enhancing the capabilities of real-time, context-aware applications across diverse domains. MEC brings processing closer to the network edge, reducing latency and allowing for the improvement of data privacy, while Semantic Web technologies provide machine-interpretable knowledge representation and reasoning capabilities. Despite their potential, deploying semantic reasoners on edge devices is challenging due to their resource-intensive nature, which requires significant memory availability, computational power, and energy. Furthermore, correctness, performance and energy consumption are simultaneously important, as MEC semantics-based applications often call for real-time queries for autonomous agent decision or user-oriented decision support. This paper presents an extensive experimental evaluation of Web Ontology Language (OWL) reasoners deployed in MEC environments, assessing correctness, processing time, memory usage, and energy consumption across both a reference tablet and a single-board computer. For energy measurement, both software profiling and hardware monitoring have been exploited and compared. The study is supported by a modular, cross-platform benchmarking framework that automates data collection and ensures reproducibility. The findings highlight the trade-offs between reasoning capabilities and resource consumption, offering valuable insights for refining testing methodologies as well as optimizing semantic reasoners in MEC settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112696"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225003656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Semantic Web technologies into Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) platforms is enhancing the capabilities of real-time, context-aware applications across diverse domains. MEC brings processing closer to the network edge, reducing latency and allowing for the improvement of data privacy, while Semantic Web technologies provide machine-interpretable knowledge representation and reasoning capabilities. Despite their potential, deploying semantic reasoners on edge devices is challenging due to their resource-intensive nature, which requires significant memory availability, computational power, and energy. Furthermore, correctness, performance and energy consumption are simultaneously important, as MEC semantics-based applications often call for real-time queries for autonomous agent decision or user-oriented decision support. This paper presents an extensive experimental evaluation of Web Ontology Language (OWL) reasoners deployed in MEC environments, assessing correctness, processing time, memory usage, and energy consumption across both a reference tablet and a single-board computer. For energy measurement, both software profiling and hardware monitoring have been exploited and compared. The study is supported by a modular, cross-platform benchmarking framework that automates data collection and ensures reproducibility. The findings highlight the trade-offs between reasoning capabilities and resource consumption, offering valuable insights for refining testing methodologies as well as optimizing semantic reasoners in MEC settings.

Abstract Image

评估移动边缘计算中语义推理器的正确性、性能和能量足迹
语义网技术与移动边缘计算(MEC)平台的集成增强了跨不同领域的实时、上下文感知应用程序的能力。MEC使处理更接近网络边缘,减少延迟并允许改进数据隐私,而语义Web技术提供机器可解释的知识表示和推理能力。尽管具有潜力,但在边缘设备上部署语义推理器具有挑战性,因为它们需要大量的内存可用性、计算能力和能源。此外,正确性、性能和能耗同时很重要,因为基于MEC语义的应用程序经常需要实时查询来进行自主代理决策或面向用户的决策支持。本文对部署在MEC环境中的Web本体语言(OWL)推理器进行了广泛的实验评估,评估了在参考平板电脑和单板计算机上的正确性、处理时间、内存使用和能耗。在能量测量方面,对软件分析和硬件监测两种方法进行了探讨和比较。该研究由模块化、跨平台基准测试框架支持,该框架可自动收集数据并确保可重复性。研究结果强调了推理能力和资源消耗之间的权衡,为改进测试方法以及优化MEC设置中的语义推理器提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书