Effect of resistance training with different occlusion pressure on hand grip strength and forearm girth among young adults- A pilot study

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Tarun Kumar , Tanya Gujral
{"title":"Effect of resistance training with different occlusion pressure on hand grip strength and forearm girth among young adults- A pilot study","authors":"Tarun Kumar ,&nbsp;Tanya Gujral","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Since skeletal muscle is essential for metabolism and self-sufficiency, methods to preserve or improve its mass and strength are therapeutically significant. Although hypertrophy and strength improvements can be effectively achieved by high-resistance training, excessive joint loading is frequently caused by the resistance levels being too high. You can train with low loads using Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT), which has the same hypertrophic and strength-building effects as conventional high-resistance training. The effects of constant occlusion pressure versus occlusion pressure that is established during a BFRT session on results, however, are not well understood.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The goal is to evaluate how muscle strength and girth are affected by constant versus dynamic occlusion pressure after BFRT.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Participants were split into two groups: Group A used a fixed occlusion pressure decided on Day 1 to perform BFRT whileGroup B employed occlusion pressure measured before each session. Forearm girth and hand grip strength were measured both before and after the training session. Both independent and paired t-tests were used to analyze the data.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>A significant difference in forearm girth was found across groups (p &lt; 0.05). Group B's muscle strength and both groups' muscle girth improved significantly, according to within-group analyses (p &lt; 0.05). Across sessions, the session-specific pressure technique (Group B) showed more flexibility and reactivity to physiological changes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In summary, assessing arterial occlusion pressure prior to each training session improves the accuracy and efficacy of BFRT and supports customised, secure, and clinically flexible exercise regimens. This study offers fresh data that helps determine the best way to use BFRT in performance and rehabilitation contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"46 ","pages":"Pages 274-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500470X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Since skeletal muscle is essential for metabolism and self-sufficiency, methods to preserve or improve its mass and strength are therapeutically significant. Although hypertrophy and strength improvements can be effectively achieved by high-resistance training, excessive joint loading is frequently caused by the resistance levels being too high. You can train with low loads using Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT), which has the same hypertrophic and strength-building effects as conventional high-resistance training. The effects of constant occlusion pressure versus occlusion pressure that is established during a BFRT session on results, however, are not well understood.

Aim

The goal is to evaluate how muscle strength and girth are affected by constant versus dynamic occlusion pressure after BFRT.

Methodology

Participants were split into two groups: Group A used a fixed occlusion pressure decided on Day 1 to perform BFRT whileGroup B employed occlusion pressure measured before each session. Forearm girth and hand grip strength were measured both before and after the training session. Both independent and paired t-tests were used to analyze the data.

Result

A significant difference in forearm girth was found across groups (p < 0.05). Group B's muscle strength and both groups' muscle girth improved significantly, according to within-group analyses (p < 0.05). Across sessions, the session-specific pressure technique (Group B) showed more flexibility and reactivity to physiological changes.

Conclusion

In summary, assessing arterial occlusion pressure prior to each training session improves the accuracy and efficacy of BFRT and supports customised, secure, and clinically flexible exercise regimens. This study offers fresh data that helps determine the best way to use BFRT in performance and rehabilitation contexts.
不同咬合压力下的阻力训练对年轻人握力和前臂周长的影响-一项初步研究
由于骨骼肌是新陈代谢和自给自足所必需的,因此保持或提高其质量和力量的方法具有重要的治疗意义。虽然通过高阻力训练可以有效地实现肥大和力量的提高,但过高的关节负荷往往是由阻力水平过高引起的。你可以用低负荷的血流量限制训练(BFRT)进行训练,它与传统的高阻力训练具有相同的增厚和力量增强效果。然而,在BFRT期间建立的恒定闭塞压力与闭塞压力对结果的影响尚未得到很好的理解。目的评估BFRT后恒定和动态闭塞压力对肌肉力量和周长的影响。方法将参与者分为两组:A组使用第1天确定的固定咬合压力进行BFRT, B组使用每次疗程前测量的咬合压力。在训练前后测量前臂周长和手部握力。采用独立t检验和配对t检验对数据进行分析。结果各组患者前臂围长差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。组内分析显示,B组肌肉力量和两组肌肉周长均显著提高(p < 0.05)。在整个疗程中,特定疗程压力技术(B组)对生理变化表现出更强的灵活性和反应性。总之,每次训练前评估动脉闭塞压力可提高BFRT的准确性和有效性,并支持定制、安全、临床灵活的运动方案。这项研究提供了新的数据,有助于确定在性能和康复环境中使用BFRT的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书