{"title":"Effect of resistance training with different occlusion pressure on hand grip strength and forearm girth among young adults- A pilot study","authors":"Tarun Kumar , Tanya Gujral","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Since skeletal muscle is essential for metabolism and self-sufficiency, methods to preserve or improve its mass and strength are therapeutically significant. Although hypertrophy and strength improvements can be effectively achieved by high-resistance training, excessive joint loading is frequently caused by the resistance levels being too high. You can train with low loads using Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT), which has the same hypertrophic and strength-building effects as conventional high-resistance training. The effects of constant occlusion pressure versus occlusion pressure that is established during a BFRT session on results, however, are not well understood.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The goal is to evaluate how muscle strength and girth are affected by constant versus dynamic occlusion pressure after BFRT.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Participants were split into two groups: Group A used a fixed occlusion pressure decided on Day 1 to perform BFRT whileGroup B employed occlusion pressure measured before each session. Forearm girth and hand grip strength were measured both before and after the training session. Both independent and paired t-tests were used to analyze the data.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>A significant difference in forearm girth was found across groups (p < 0.05). Group B's muscle strength and both groups' muscle girth improved significantly, according to within-group analyses (p < 0.05). Across sessions, the session-specific pressure technique (Group B) showed more flexibility and reactivity to physiological changes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In summary, assessing arterial occlusion pressure prior to each training session improves the accuracy and efficacy of BFRT and supports customised, secure, and clinically flexible exercise regimens. This study offers fresh data that helps determine the best way to use BFRT in performance and rehabilitation contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"46 ","pages":"Pages 274-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500470X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Since skeletal muscle is essential for metabolism and self-sufficiency, methods to preserve or improve its mass and strength are therapeutically significant. Although hypertrophy and strength improvements can be effectively achieved by high-resistance training, excessive joint loading is frequently caused by the resistance levels being too high. You can train with low loads using Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT), which has the same hypertrophic and strength-building effects as conventional high-resistance training. The effects of constant occlusion pressure versus occlusion pressure that is established during a BFRT session on results, however, are not well understood.
Aim
The goal is to evaluate how muscle strength and girth are affected by constant versus dynamic occlusion pressure after BFRT.
Methodology
Participants were split into two groups: Group A used a fixed occlusion pressure decided on Day 1 to perform BFRT whileGroup B employed occlusion pressure measured before each session. Forearm girth and hand grip strength were measured both before and after the training session. Both independent and paired t-tests were used to analyze the data.
Result
A significant difference in forearm girth was found across groups (p < 0.05). Group B's muscle strength and both groups' muscle girth improved significantly, according to within-group analyses (p < 0.05). Across sessions, the session-specific pressure technique (Group B) showed more flexibility and reactivity to physiological changes.
Conclusion
In summary, assessing arterial occlusion pressure prior to each training session improves the accuracy and efficacy of BFRT and supports customised, secure, and clinically flexible exercise regimens. This study offers fresh data that helps determine the best way to use BFRT in performance and rehabilitation contexts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina