Decolonising innovation in sustainability transitions for pluriversal justice and wellbeing

IF 6.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Saurabh Arora , Bipashyee Ghosh , Andy Stirling
{"title":"Decolonising innovation in sustainability transitions for pluriversal justice and wellbeing","authors":"Saurabh Arora ,&nbsp;Bipashyee Ghosh ,&nbsp;Andy Stirling","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2025.101064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainability scholars address social-ecological injustices associated with innovation processes, through concepts such as ‘just transitions’ and ‘energy justice’. However, the making of today’s innovations by <em>deep and pervasive formations of power and privilege – colonial modernities</em> – is currently neglected in sustainability transition studies. We conceptualise nine epistemological and ontological foundations of distinctively colonial-modern innovation processes. These foundations include: fixing categorical divides on flowing relations; stratifying rigidly separated orders; promoting appropriation of privileges; objectifying and reifying realities; monopolising quantifications; standardising practices; singularising ontology, by approaching the pluriverse (of many different and connected ways of knowing, being and doing in disparate worlds) as just one world; and dominating other worlds by colonial-modern worldmaking.</div><div>Taken together, these interwoven foundations point to the following actions to help decolonise modern innovation processes: recognising and <em>challenging colonial formations</em> of concentrated power and privilege as they are built into modern knowing; <em>extending egalitarian relations</em> towards intersectionally marginalised contributors in knowledge production; <em>grasping multifarious encompassment</em> by wider material and living ecologies of beings notionally separated as ‘human’ or ‘nonhuman’; <em>embracing inherent uncertainties</em> in all that can be known or made, to imbue knowing and making with humility and care; <em>admitting open pluralities</em> of qualities, which include approaching dimensions of categories as fluid; and <em>supporting pluriversal reparations</em> spanning many ways of knowing, in struggles to dismantle coloniality everywhere. Decolonising innovation processes in these ways, we propose, can contribute to deeper decolonial transformations of modernities in solidarity with colonially subordinated peoples’ <em>struggles for pluriversal wellbeing and justice</em>. Without realising such justice for the flourishing of many worlds, sustainability may remain little more than a modern illusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101064"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422425001030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainability scholars address social-ecological injustices associated with innovation processes, through concepts such as ‘just transitions’ and ‘energy justice’. However, the making of today’s innovations by deep and pervasive formations of power and privilege – colonial modernities – is currently neglected in sustainability transition studies. We conceptualise nine epistemological and ontological foundations of distinctively colonial-modern innovation processes. These foundations include: fixing categorical divides on flowing relations; stratifying rigidly separated orders; promoting appropriation of privileges; objectifying and reifying realities; monopolising quantifications; standardising practices; singularising ontology, by approaching the pluriverse (of many different and connected ways of knowing, being and doing in disparate worlds) as just one world; and dominating other worlds by colonial-modern worldmaking.
Taken together, these interwoven foundations point to the following actions to help decolonise modern innovation processes: recognising and challenging colonial formations of concentrated power and privilege as they are built into modern knowing; extending egalitarian relations towards intersectionally marginalised contributors in knowledge production; grasping multifarious encompassment by wider material and living ecologies of beings notionally separated as ‘human’ or ‘nonhuman’; embracing inherent uncertainties in all that can be known or made, to imbue knowing and making with humility and care; admitting open pluralities of qualities, which include approaching dimensions of categories as fluid; and supporting pluriversal reparations spanning many ways of knowing, in struggles to dismantle coloniality everywhere. Decolonising innovation processes in these ways, we propose, can contribute to deeper decolonial transformations of modernities in solidarity with colonially subordinated peoples’ struggles for pluriversal wellbeing and justice. Without realising such justice for the flourishing of many worlds, sustainability may remain little more than a modern illusion.
可持续性转型中的非殖民化创新,以实现多元正义和福祉
可持续发展学者通过“公正过渡”和“能源公正”等概念解决与创新过程相关的社会生态不公正问题。然而,在可持续性转型研究中,深刻而普遍的权力和特权形成——殖民现代性——对今天的创新的影响目前被忽视了。我们概念化独特的殖民-现代创新过程的九个认识论和本体论基础。这些基础包括:确定流动关系的范畴划分;将严格分离的目分层;促进特权的挪用;客观化和物化现实;垄断量化;标准化实践;奇点本体,通过将多元宇宙(在不同的世界中许多不同的、相互联系的认识、存在和行为方式)视为一个世界;并通过殖民主义和现代主义统治其他世界。综上所述,这些相互交织的基础指向了以下行动,以帮助现代创新进程去殖民化:承认并挑战集中权力和特权的殖民形成,因为它们已融入现代知识;将平等主义关系扩展到知识生产中交叉边缘化的贡献者;通过更广泛的物质和生物生态来把握各种各样的范围,这些生物在概念上被划分为“人类”或“非人类”;拥抱所有已知或创造的固有的不确定性,以谦卑和关怀来灌输认知和创造;承认开放的多元性,其中包括接近作为流动的范畴的维度;并支持多元赔偿,跨越多种认识方式,在各地拆除殖民主义的斗争中。我们认为,以这些方式进行的非殖民化创新进程可以促进现代性的更深层次的非殖民化转变,与殖民地附属人民争取多元福祉和正义的斗争团结一致。如果不能为许多世界的繁荣实现这样的正义,可持续性可能仅仅是一种现代幻想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书