Determining the influence of livelihoods, land access, and location on household food and nutrition security in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

IF 5.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Agricultural and Food Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-15 DOI:10.1186/s40100-025-00435-w
Mallika Sardeshpande, Rowan Naicker, Sithabile Hlahla, Onisimo Mutanga, Rob Slotow, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi
{"title":"Determining the influence of livelihoods, land access, and location on household food and nutrition security in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.","authors":"Mallika Sardeshpande, Rowan Naicker, Sithabile Hlahla, Onisimo Mutanga, Rob Slotow, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi","doi":"10.1186/s40100-025-00435-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to healthy food varies across socioeconomic circumstances such as primary livelihood, and access to shops, land, farms, and cities. We compared household food and nutrition security across households with food-producing and non-food-producing livelihoods, access to farms and non-farm greenspaces, and their location relative to farms, non-farm greenspaces, shops, and urban centres. We used household survey data and landscape spatial data from five sites across the socioeconomic gradient. Food security was higher in wealthier, more educated, urban households, and dietary diversity was highest in rural and agrarian households. Non-farm greenspaces such as communal and informal land, and backyard and communal gardens, were significant food sources. On-farm diversification, smallholder support, and provisioning of non-farm greenspaces can improve food and nutrition security. Agricultural extension and spatial planning policy should target smallholder capacitation, and development of fruit and vegetable gardens in both rural and urban areas, for sustainable, equitable, healthy food environments.</p><p><strong>Graphic abstract: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":37688,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Food Economics","volume":"13 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12619708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Food Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00435-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to healthy food varies across socioeconomic circumstances such as primary livelihood, and access to shops, land, farms, and cities. We compared household food and nutrition security across households with food-producing and non-food-producing livelihoods, access to farms and non-farm greenspaces, and their location relative to farms, non-farm greenspaces, shops, and urban centres. We used household survey data and landscape spatial data from five sites across the socioeconomic gradient. Food security was higher in wealthier, more educated, urban households, and dietary diversity was highest in rural and agrarian households. Non-farm greenspaces such as communal and informal land, and backyard and communal gardens, were significant food sources. On-farm diversification, smallholder support, and provisioning of non-farm greenspaces can improve food and nutrition security. Agricultural extension and spatial planning policy should target smallholder capacitation, and development of fruit and vegetable gardens in both rural and urban areas, for sustainable, equitable, healthy food environments.

Graphic abstract:

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

确定生计、土地获取和地点对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省家庭粮食和营养安全的影响。
获得健康食品的机会因社会经济环境的不同而异,如主要生计、商店、土地、农场和城市。我们比较了粮食生产和非粮食生产生计、农场和非农业绿地的可及性以及相对于农场、非农业绿地、商店和城市中心的位置的家庭粮食和营养安全。我们使用了跨越社会经济梯度的五个站点的住户调查数据和景观空间数据。富裕、受教育程度更高的城市家庭的粮食安全水平更高,而农村和农业家庭的饮食多样性最高。非农业绿色空间,如公共和非正式土地,后院和公共花园,是重要的食物来源。农场多样化、对小农的支持和提供非农业绿色空间可以改善粮食和营养安全。农业推广和空间规划政策应以农村和城市地区小农的能力建设以及果园和菜园的发展为目标,以创造可持续、公平、健康的食物环境。图形抽象:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Food Economics
Agricultural and Food Economics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Food Economics (AFE) is an international peer-reviewed and open access journal published on behalf of the Italian Society of Agricultural Economics. AFE welcomes research articles from economists, scholars and researchers from all over the world to publish problem-oriented and high-quality articles. AFE publishes only original articles from a wide variety of economic perspectives that address current and relevant issues related to the agricultural and food system. AFE publishes articles focused on applied analysis, the discussion of innovative results, and relevant policy and managerial implications. AFE seeks clearly written articles from experts in the field, to promote insightful understanding of the current trends in the agri-food system. Topics of specific interest to AFE include agricultural and food market analysis, agri-food firm management and marketing, organization of the agri-food chains, consumer behavior, food quality and safety issues, economics of nutrition and food security, food and health economics, agri-food policy and trade, sustainable rural development, natural and marine resource economics and land economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书