Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Primary Visual Cortex in Patients With Chronic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1111/papr.70092
Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sara Ramezani, Babak Bakhshayesh Eghbali, Mozaffar Hosseininezhad, Alireza Safarifard, Nasim Alipour, Anahita Emir Alavi, Mohammad Ali Yazdanipour, Mohammad Shabani Chobe, Mohammad Amouzadeh, Seyedeh Mohadese Mosavi Mirkalaie, Mohaya Farzin
{"title":"Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Primary Visual Cortex in Patients With Chronic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sara Ramezani, Babak Bakhshayesh Eghbali, Mozaffar Hosseininezhad, Alireza Safarifard, Nasim Alipour, Anahita Emir Alavi, Mohammad Ali Yazdanipour, Mohammad Shabani Chobe, Mohammad Amouzadeh, Seyedeh Mohadese Mosavi Mirkalaie, Mohaya Farzin","doi":"10.1111/papr.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the immediate and long-term therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using two distinct montages of anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over the primary visual cortex compared with a sham tDCS in patients with chronic migraines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 72 eligible patients with resistant chronic migraine were randomly assigned to one of three groups, receiving anodal or cathodal (2 mA for 20 min), or sham tDCS (0.5 mA for 30 s), over the pain-dominant side of the primary visual cortex. Clinical features including the number of migraine attacks per month, attack duration, pain intensity, and frequency of painkiller use at baseline, 2 months after starting and ending tDCS therapy were recorded using a personal questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both anodal and cathodal real tDCS protocols resulted in a significant reduction in the number of attacks, pain intensity, attack duration, and frequency of painkiller use during the treatment period compared to baseline. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding the therapeutic efficacy. However, only anodal tDCS significantly maintained the beneficial therapeutic effects on the number of migraine attacks and painkiller use at the follow-up phase. The sham protocol did not produce any significant clinical utility in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study supports the analgesic effects of the proposed real tDCS approaches in patients with resistant chronic migraine. Anodal tDCS may offer superior benefits to cathodal tDCS, likely by stabilizing therapeutic outcomes through reorganizing the thalamocortical pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"e70092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the immediate and long-term therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using two distinct montages of anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over the primary visual cortex compared with a sham tDCS in patients with chronic migraines.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 72 eligible patients with resistant chronic migraine were randomly assigned to one of three groups, receiving anodal or cathodal (2 mA for 20 min), or sham tDCS (0.5 mA for 30 s), over the pain-dominant side of the primary visual cortex. Clinical features including the number of migraine attacks per month, attack duration, pain intensity, and frequency of painkiller use at baseline, 2 months after starting and ending tDCS therapy were recorded using a personal questionnaire.

Results: Both anodal and cathodal real tDCS protocols resulted in a significant reduction in the number of attacks, pain intensity, attack duration, and frequency of painkiller use during the treatment period compared to baseline. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding the therapeutic efficacy. However, only anodal tDCS significantly maintained the beneficial therapeutic effects on the number of migraine attacks and painkiller use at the follow-up phase. The sham protocol did not produce any significant clinical utility in this population.

Conclusions: The study supports the analgesic effects of the proposed real tDCS approaches in patients with resistant chronic migraine. Anodal tDCS may offer superior benefits to cathodal tDCS, likely by stabilizing therapeutic outcomes through reorganizing the thalamocortical pathway.

不同蒙太奇的经颅直流电刺激对慢性偏头痛患者初级视觉皮层的近期和长期影响:一项随机、双盲、假对照试验。
背景:我们评估了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对慢性偏头痛患者的即时和长期治疗效果,在初级视觉皮层上使用两种不同的阳极和阴极电刺激蒙太奇,并与假tDCS进行比较。方法:在这项随机、双盲、对照试验中,72名符合条件的顽固性慢性偏头痛患者被随机分为三组,分别在初级视觉皮层疼痛为主的一侧接受阳极或阴极(2 mA持续20分钟)或假tDCS (0.5 mA持续30秒)。临床特征包括每月偏头痛发作次数、发作持续时间、疼痛强度和基线时止痛药使用频率,开始和结束tDCS治疗后2个月,使用个人问卷记录。结果:与基线相比,阳极和阴极的tDCS治疗方案在治疗期间显著减少了发作次数、疼痛强度、发作持续时间和止痛药使用频率。两组治疗效果无显著性差异。然而,在随访阶段,只有阳极tDCS在偏头痛发作次数和止痛药使用方面显著保持有益的治疗效果。假方案在这一人群中没有产生任何显著的临床效用。结论:该研究支持提出的真实tDCS方法对顽固性慢性偏头痛患者的镇痛作用。阳极tDCS可能比阴极tDCS有更好的疗效,可能是通过重组丘脑皮质通路来稳定治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书