Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Primary Visual Cortex in Patients With Chronic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.
Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sara Ramezani, Babak Bakhshayesh Eghbali, Mozaffar Hosseininezhad, Alireza Safarifard, Nasim Alipour, Anahita Emir Alavi, Mohammad Ali Yazdanipour, Mohammad Shabani Chobe, Mohammad Amouzadeh, Seyedeh Mohadese Mosavi Mirkalaie, Mohaya Farzin
{"title":"Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Primary Visual Cortex in Patients With Chronic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sara Ramezani, Babak Bakhshayesh Eghbali, Mozaffar Hosseininezhad, Alireza Safarifard, Nasim Alipour, Anahita Emir Alavi, Mohammad Ali Yazdanipour, Mohammad Shabani Chobe, Mohammad Amouzadeh, Seyedeh Mohadese Mosavi Mirkalaie, Mohaya Farzin","doi":"10.1111/papr.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the immediate and long-term therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using two distinct montages of anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over the primary visual cortex compared with a sham tDCS in patients with chronic migraines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 72 eligible patients with resistant chronic migraine were randomly assigned to one of three groups, receiving anodal or cathodal (2 mA for 20 min), or sham tDCS (0.5 mA for 30 s), over the pain-dominant side of the primary visual cortex. Clinical features including the number of migraine attacks per month, attack duration, pain intensity, and frequency of painkiller use at baseline, 2 months after starting and ending tDCS therapy were recorded using a personal questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both anodal and cathodal real tDCS protocols resulted in a significant reduction in the number of attacks, pain intensity, attack duration, and frequency of painkiller use during the treatment period compared to baseline. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding the therapeutic efficacy. However, only anodal tDCS significantly maintained the beneficial therapeutic effects on the number of migraine attacks and painkiller use at the follow-up phase. The sham protocol did not produce any significant clinical utility in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study supports the analgesic effects of the proposed real tDCS approaches in patients with resistant chronic migraine. Anodal tDCS may offer superior benefits to cathodal tDCS, likely by stabilizing therapeutic outcomes through reorganizing the thalamocortical pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"e70092"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the immediate and long-term therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using two distinct montages of anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over the primary visual cortex compared with a sham tDCS in patients with chronic migraines.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 72 eligible patients with resistant chronic migraine were randomly assigned to one of three groups, receiving anodal or cathodal (2 mA for 20 min), or sham tDCS (0.5 mA for 30 s), over the pain-dominant side of the primary visual cortex. Clinical features including the number of migraine attacks per month, attack duration, pain intensity, and frequency of painkiller use at baseline, 2 months after starting and ending tDCS therapy were recorded using a personal questionnaire.
Results: Both anodal and cathodal real tDCS protocols resulted in a significant reduction in the number of attacks, pain intensity, attack duration, and frequency of painkiller use during the treatment period compared to baseline. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding the therapeutic efficacy. However, only anodal tDCS significantly maintained the beneficial therapeutic effects on the number of migraine attacks and painkiller use at the follow-up phase. The sham protocol did not produce any significant clinical utility in this population.
Conclusions: The study supports the analgesic effects of the proposed real tDCS approaches in patients with resistant chronic migraine. Anodal tDCS may offer superior benefits to cathodal tDCS, likely by stabilizing therapeutic outcomes through reorganizing the thalamocortical pathway.
期刊介绍:
Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.