{"title":"Acute modest changes in relative humidity do not affect energy expenditure at rest in human subjects.","authors":"E Nielsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Energy expenditure at rest was determined twice in 10 healthy subjects with a 2-d interval at a relative humidity of 32 and 66 per cent respectively. The relative humidity over the 2 d preceding each observation was estimated to be about 32 per cent. The average (+/- s.e.m.) difference between the RMR at a relative humidity of 32 and 66 per cent respectively was found to be 0.3 +/- 1.2 watt. The results presented here justify the commonly used practice of neglecting variations in humidity when reporting on results of observations of resting metabolic rates in apparently healthy subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13078,"journal":{"name":"Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition","volume":"41 6","pages":"485-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy expenditure at rest was determined twice in 10 healthy subjects with a 2-d interval at a relative humidity of 32 and 66 per cent respectively. The relative humidity over the 2 d preceding each observation was estimated to be about 32 per cent. The average (+/- s.e.m.) difference between the RMR at a relative humidity of 32 and 66 per cent respectively was found to be 0.3 +/- 1.2 watt. The results presented here justify the commonly used practice of neglecting variations in humidity when reporting on results of observations of resting metabolic rates in apparently healthy subjects.