Introducing the FACE framework: Rethinking age-friendly communities through lived experiences in regional Australia

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Studies Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101382
Ting Song , Amy Tapsell , Lorna Moxham , Mark Jones , David Hailey , Bo Du , Rod Young , Ping Yu
{"title":"Introducing the FACE framework: Rethinking age-friendly communities through lived experiences in regional Australia","authors":"Ting Song ,&nbsp;Amy Tapsell ,&nbsp;Lorna Moxham ,&nbsp;Mark Jones ,&nbsp;David Hailey ,&nbsp;Bo Du ,&nbsp;Rod Young ,&nbsp;Ping Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the unprecedented growth of the ageing population and increasing urbanisation, age-friendly community (AFC) initiatives have gained significant global momentum. However, existing AFC research has largely prioritised the perspectives of implementers in metropolitan or rural contexts, leaving a critical gap in understanding how community members, particularly those in regional areas, conceptualise age-friendliness and express their needs and priorities. Guided by environmental gerontology, which emphasises the dynamic interaction between individuals and their environments, and geographical gerontology, which focuses on the role of place and spatial context, this qualitative study explores perceptions of AFCs among middle-aged and older adults (≥45 years) living in the Illawarra region of New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 participants, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. From participants' perspectives, we developed the FACE framework, comprising four interconnected dimensions: Facilitators, Ambitions, Conditions, and Engagement. Facilitators represent the drivers of AFC development, including government, non-government organisations, and individuals who raise awareness and provide support. Ambitions capture older adults' aspirations for independence, continuity of lifestyle, and emotional security. Conditions include intrinsic factors (e.g., mobility, health, emotional well-being) and extrinsic factors (e.g., housing, transport, health care, recreational infrastructure) that shape the fulfilment of the ambitions. Engagement reflects older adults' participation in community life, shaped by the availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptability of relevant services and resources. The FACE framework offers a structured, community-informed, and theoretically grounded approach to guide the development and evaluation of AFCs, particularly in regional settings, with potential adaptability to diverse communities across Australia and internationally. By centring the lived experiences and perspectives of middle-aged and older residents, this study contributes to a more comprehensive and place-sensitive understanding of AFCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406525000763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the unprecedented growth of the ageing population and increasing urbanisation, age-friendly community (AFC) initiatives have gained significant global momentum. However, existing AFC research has largely prioritised the perspectives of implementers in metropolitan or rural contexts, leaving a critical gap in understanding how community members, particularly those in regional areas, conceptualise age-friendliness and express their needs and priorities. Guided by environmental gerontology, which emphasises the dynamic interaction between individuals and their environments, and geographical gerontology, which focuses on the role of place and spatial context, this qualitative study explores perceptions of AFCs among middle-aged and older adults (≥45 years) living in the Illawarra region of New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 participants, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. From participants' perspectives, we developed the FACE framework, comprising four interconnected dimensions: Facilitators, Ambitions, Conditions, and Engagement. Facilitators represent the drivers of AFC development, including government, non-government organisations, and individuals who raise awareness and provide support. Ambitions capture older adults' aspirations for independence, continuity of lifestyle, and emotional security. Conditions include intrinsic factors (e.g., mobility, health, emotional well-being) and extrinsic factors (e.g., housing, transport, health care, recreational infrastructure) that shape the fulfilment of the ambitions. Engagement reflects older adults' participation in community life, shaped by the availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptability of relevant services and resources. The FACE framework offers a structured, community-informed, and theoretically grounded approach to guide the development and evaluation of AFCs, particularly in regional settings, with potential adaptability to diverse communities across Australia and internationally. By centring the lived experiences and perspectives of middle-aged and older residents, this study contributes to a more comprehensive and place-sensitive understanding of AFCs.
介绍FACE框架:通过澳大利亚地区的生活经验重新思考老年人友好型社区
随着老龄化人口的空前增长和城市化进程的加快,老年友好社区(AFC)倡议在全球范围内获得了巨大的动力。然而,现有的AFC研究在很大程度上优先考虑了大都市或农村背景下的实施者的观点,在理解社区成员,特别是区域地区的社区成员如何概念化老年友好并表达他们的需求和优先事项方面留下了重大空白。在环境老年学(强调个体与环境之间的动态相互作用)和地理老年学(关注地点和空间背景的作用)的指导下,本定性研究探讨了生活在澳大利亚新南威尔士州伊拉瓦拉地区的中老年人(≥45岁)对AFCs的看法。对30名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,逐字记录并按主题进行分析。从参与者的角度出发,我们开发了FACE框架,包括四个相互关联的维度:促进者、抱负、条件和参与度。促进者代表着亚足联发展的推动者,包括政府、非政府组织和提高意识并提供支持的个人。野心是指老年人对独立、生活方式的连续性和情感安全的渴望。条件包括影响实现抱负的内在因素(如流动性、健康、情感幸福)和外在因素(如住房、交通、保健、娱乐基础设施)。参与反映了老年人对社区生活的参与,受相关服务和资源的可得性、可及性、可负担性和可接受性的影响。FACE框架提供了一个结构化的、社区知情的、理论基础的方法来指导afc的发展和评估,特别是在区域环境中,具有潜在的适应性,适用于澳大利亚和国际上不同的社区。通过集中中老年居民的生活经验和观点,本研究有助于对afc进行更全面和地点敏感的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书