[A comparative study on sampling methods of disposable dust masks for fit tests (2)].

Ryotaro Oshima, Hiroshi Okochi, Yuji Kubota
{"title":"[A comparative study on sampling methods of disposable dust masks for fit tests (2)].","authors":"Ryotaro Oshima, Hiroshi Okochi, Yuji Kubota","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2025-013-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, under the JIS standards, the test guides commonly used in Japan to evaluate the fit of mask facepieces on a wearer's face are not approved for use in fit tests. This study aimed to determine whether a non-destructive test guide for assessing fit could be applied to fit testing using the Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) Quantitative Fit Test Short Protocol with light-scattering-based measuring devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Values obtained using probe attachments approved under the JIS standards were used as reference values, and the fit factor (FF) values measured using test guides and disposable test guides were compared. The evaluation criteria were based on the judgment specified in Annex A2 of the ANSI Z88.10-2010 standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FF values obtained with both test guides and the disposable test guides met the mandatory and additional criteria when compared to those obtained with probe attachments. This indicates that both guides are equivalent to probe attachments for determining pass/fail outcomes and are thus applicable to fit tests. Additionally, the exclusion range, defined to account for device variability, was calculated as FF values ranging from 72 to 138, resulting in the exclusion of approximately 11% of the data from the evaluation. This exclusion range was deemed appropriate, as the effective data rate closely matched the pass/fail consistency rate between the two devices. Furthermore, the pass/fail consistency rate between the probe attachments and both guides was approximately 80%. FF values tend to be lower with test guides owing to larger movement during testing than those with probe attachments; however, our results suggest that such differences do not significantly affect pass/fail outcomes. Therefore, the 80% pass/fail consistency rate was not attributed to motion effects but rather reflected the stringent evaluation capabilities of the test guides themselves.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The validity of the fit test using light-scattering based measuring devices under the JIS short protocol was evaluated for disposable masks using test guides that are widely used in Japan to assess the fit between mask facepieces and faces. The results, based on the ANSI criteria, indicated that both the test guides and disposable test guides provided evaluations equivalent to those of the probe attachments. Consequently, this study demonstrated that the test guides and disposable test guides are applicable fit tests. Both test guides concluded that strict evaluations of insertion leakage helped reduce false positives, making them reliable for worker protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94204,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":" ","pages":"16-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2025-013-B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Currently, under the JIS standards, the test guides commonly used in Japan to evaluate the fit of mask facepieces on a wearer's face are not approved for use in fit tests. This study aimed to determine whether a non-destructive test guide for assessing fit could be applied to fit testing using the Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) Quantitative Fit Test Short Protocol with light-scattering-based measuring devices.

Methods: Values obtained using probe attachments approved under the JIS standards were used as reference values, and the fit factor (FF) values measured using test guides and disposable test guides were compared. The evaluation criteria were based on the judgment specified in Annex A2 of the ANSI Z88.10-2010 standards.

Results: The FF values obtained with both test guides and the disposable test guides met the mandatory and additional criteria when compared to those obtained with probe attachments. This indicates that both guides are equivalent to probe attachments for determining pass/fail outcomes and are thus applicable to fit tests. Additionally, the exclusion range, defined to account for device variability, was calculated as FF values ranging from 72 to 138, resulting in the exclusion of approximately 11% of the data from the evaluation. This exclusion range was deemed appropriate, as the effective data rate closely matched the pass/fail consistency rate between the two devices. Furthermore, the pass/fail consistency rate between the probe attachments and both guides was approximately 80%. FF values tend to be lower with test guides owing to larger movement during testing than those with probe attachments; however, our results suggest that such differences do not significantly affect pass/fail outcomes. Therefore, the 80% pass/fail consistency rate was not attributed to motion effects but rather reflected the stringent evaluation capabilities of the test guides themselves.

Conclusions: The validity of the fit test using light-scattering based measuring devices under the JIS short protocol was evaluated for disposable masks using test guides that are widely used in Japan to assess the fit between mask facepieces and faces. The results, based on the ANSI criteria, indicated that both the test guides and disposable test guides provided evaluations equivalent to those of the probe attachments. Consequently, this study demonstrated that the test guides and disposable test guides are applicable fit tests. Both test guides concluded that strict evaluations of insertion leakage helped reduce false positives, making them reliable for worker protection.

[一次性防尘口罩贴合试验取样方法比较研究(2)]。
目的:目前,根据JIS标准,日本通常用于评估佩戴者面部口罩贴合度的测试指南未被批准用于贴合度测试。本研究旨在确定一种用于评估配合的无损测试指南是否可以应用于使用基于光散射的测量设备的日本工业标准(JIS)定量配合测试短协议的配合测试。方法:采用JIS标准认可的探针附件获得的值作为参考值,并比较使用试验导轨和一次性试验导轨测量的配合系数(FF)值。评价标准基于ANSI Z88.10-2010标准附件A2中规定的判断。结果:与探针附件获得的FF值相比,使用测试导轨和一次性测试导轨获得的FF值均符合强制性和附加标准。这表明两个导线都相当于用于确定合格/不合格结果的探头附件,因此适用于拟合测试。此外,排除范围(定义为考虑设备可变性)计算为FF值范围从72到138,导致从评估中排除约11%的数据。这个排除范围被认为是合适的,因为有效数据率与两个设备之间的通过/失败一致性率密切匹配。此外,探头附件和两个导轨之间的合格率/不合格率约为80%。与探针附件相比,测试导轨在测试过程中运动较大,因此FF值往往较低;然而,我们的结果表明,这种差异并没有显著影响通过/不通过的结果。因此,80%的合格/不合格一致性率不是归因于运动效果,而是反映了测试指南本身严格的评估能力。结论:采用日本广泛使用的一次性口罩贴片与面部贴合度测试指南,根据JIS短方案,对基于光散射测量装置的贴合度测试进行有效性评估。基于ANSI标准的结果表明,测试导轨和一次性测试导轨提供的评估与探头附件的评估相当。因此,本研究表明,测试导轨和一次性测试导轨是适用的拟合试验。两个测试指南的结论是,对插入泄漏的严格评估有助于减少误报,使其对工人的保护更加可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书