Multi-Cohort Federated Learning Shows Synergy in Mortality Prediction for MRI-Based and Metabolomics-Based Age Scores.

IF 4.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Journal of healthcare informatics research Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6
Pedro Mateus, Swier Garst, Jing Yu, Davy Cats, Alexander G J Harms, Mahlet Birhanu, Marian Beekman, P Eline Slagboom, Marcel Reinders, Jeroen van der Grond, Andre Dekker, Jacobus F A Jansen, Magdalena Beran, Miranda T Schram, Pieter Jelle Visser, Justine Moonen, Mohsen Ghanbari, Gennady Roshchupkin, Dina Vojinovic, Inigo Bermejo, Hailiang Mei, Esther E Bron
{"title":"Multi-Cohort Federated Learning Shows Synergy in Mortality Prediction for MRI-Based and Metabolomics-Based Age Scores.","authors":"Pedro Mateus, Swier Garst, Jing Yu, Davy Cats, Alexander G J Harms, Mahlet Birhanu, Marian Beekman, P Eline Slagboom, Marcel Reinders, Jeroen van der Grond, Andre Dekker, Jacobus F A Jansen, Magdalena Beran, Miranda T Schram, Pieter Jelle Visser, Justine Moonen, Mohsen Ghanbari, Gennady Roshchupkin, Dina Vojinovic, Inigo Bermejo, Hailiang Mei, Esther E Bron","doi":"10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While biological age scores have been shown to characterize aging by estimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers, interactions between different age scores are largely unknown. To study this, large-scale multi-modal data are crucial. However, such data are scarce as population-based cohorts are generally restricted in sharing their data. Here, we employ federated learning to study the relationship between the two types of biological age scores: BrainAge based on brain MRI and MetaboAge based on metabolites. Using three large population-based cohorts, we trained a federated deep learning model to estimate BrainAge and compared its performance to models trained in a single cohort. The federated BrainAge model yielded significantly lower error for age prediction across the cohorts than locally trained models. Harmonizing the age interval between cohorts further improved BrainAge accuracy. Subsequently, we compared BrainAge and MetaboAge by performing association analysis and survival analysis for dementia and mortality prediction to further characterize both scores. The association analysis showed a weak association between BrainAge and MetaboAge, while the survival analysis indicated complementary predictive values for the mortality risk of the two scores. Federated learning has been shown to be a valuable technique for enabling the use of research cohorts that are restricted in data sharing. We conclude that BrainAge and MetaboAge act synergetically for the prediction of time to all-cause mortality, and both aging scores capture different aspects of the aging process.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":101413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare informatics research","volume":"9 4","pages":"606-628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare informatics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While biological age scores have been shown to characterize aging by estimating chronological age based on physiological biomarkers, interactions between different age scores are largely unknown. To study this, large-scale multi-modal data are crucial. However, such data are scarce as population-based cohorts are generally restricted in sharing their data. Here, we employ federated learning to study the relationship between the two types of biological age scores: BrainAge based on brain MRI and MetaboAge based on metabolites. Using three large population-based cohorts, we trained a federated deep learning model to estimate BrainAge and compared its performance to models trained in a single cohort. The federated BrainAge model yielded significantly lower error for age prediction across the cohorts than locally trained models. Harmonizing the age interval between cohorts further improved BrainAge accuracy. Subsequently, we compared BrainAge and MetaboAge by performing association analysis and survival analysis for dementia and mortality prediction to further characterize both scores. The association analysis showed a weak association between BrainAge and MetaboAge, while the survival analysis indicated complementary predictive values for the mortality risk of the two scores. Federated learning has been shown to be a valuable technique for enabling the use of research cohorts that are restricted in data sharing. We conclude that BrainAge and MetaboAge act synergetically for the prediction of time to all-cause mortality, and both aging scores capture different aspects of the aging process.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多队列联合学习显示基于核磁共振成像和基于代谢组学的年龄评分在死亡率预测中的协同作用。
虽然生物年龄评分已被证明通过基于生理生物标志物估计实足年龄来表征衰老,但不同年龄评分之间的相互作用在很大程度上是未知的。为了研究这一点,大规模的多模态数据是至关重要的。然而,由于基于人口的队列通常在共享数据方面受到限制,因此此类数据很少。在这里,我们使用联邦学习来研究两种生物年龄评分之间的关系:基于脑MRI的BrainAge和基于代谢物的MetaboAge。使用三个基于人口的大型队列,我们训练了一个联邦深度学习模型来估计BrainAge,并将其性能与单个队列中训练的模型进行了比较。与本地训练的模型相比,联合BrainAge模型在整个队列中的年龄预测误差显著降低。协调队列之间的年龄间隔进一步提高了BrainAge的准确性。随后,我们通过对痴呆和死亡率预测进行关联分析和生存分析来比较BrainAge和MetaboAge,以进一步表征这两个评分。关联分析显示BrainAge和MetaboAge之间存在弱关联,而生存分析显示这两个评分对死亡风险具有互补的预测价值。联邦学习已被证明是一种有价值的技术,可以使用在数据共享方面受到限制的研究队列。我们得出结论,BrainAge和MetaboAge在预测全因死亡时间方面协同作用,两种衰老评分都捕获了衰老过程的不同方面。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s41666-025-00208-6获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书