Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and inhalational anesthesia on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.6
Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-31 DOI:10.17085/apm.25203
Kiran Mahendru, Abhishek Kumar, Khushboo Pandey, Riniki Sarma
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and inhalational anesthesia on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kiran Mahendru, Abhishek Kumar, Khushboo Pandey, Riniki Sarma","doi":"10.17085/apm.25203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine characterized by rapid onset and recovery with minimal accumulation after continuous infusion. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether remimazolam use results in better postoperative recovery as compared to inhalational anesthetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched up to August 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients comparing remimazolam with volatile agents were included. The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included use of rescue antiemetics and analgesics, pain scores, intraoperative hypotension, and other postoperative recovery parameters. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to validate the robustness of the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve RCTs involving 853 patients were analyzed. Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence of PONV (relative risk [RR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.96; I² = 43%; P = 0.04) and need for rescue antiemetics (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10-0.89; I² = 0%; P = 0.03) compared to inhalational agents. No significant differences were found in postoperative pain scores (standardized mean difference -0.17; P = 0.11) or analgesic requirement (RR 0.95; P = 0.82). Remimazolam was associated with a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RR 0.58; P = 0.01). Time to extubation, sedation scores, and post-anesthesia care unit stay were comparable. TSA confirmed that the required information size for the primary outcome was reached, indicating statistical conclusiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam use is associated with significantly reduced PONV, rescue antiemetic use, and intraoperative hypotension compared to inhalational agents. TSA confirms the robustness of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"20 4","pages":"393-405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12611516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine characterized by rapid onset and recovery with minimal accumulation after continuous infusion. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether remimazolam use results in better postoperative recovery as compared to inhalational anesthetics.

Methods: Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched up to August 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients comparing remimazolam with volatile agents were included. The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included use of rescue antiemetics and analgesics, pain scores, intraoperative hypotension, and other postoperative recovery parameters. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to validate the robustness of the primary outcome.

Results: Twelve RCTs involving 853 patients were analyzed. Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence of PONV (relative risk [RR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.96; I² = 43%; P = 0.04) and need for rescue antiemetics (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10-0.89; I² = 0%; P = 0.03) compared to inhalational agents. No significant differences were found in postoperative pain scores (standardized mean difference -0.17; P = 0.11) or analgesic requirement (RR 0.95; P = 0.82). Remimazolam was associated with a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension (RR 0.58; P = 0.01). Time to extubation, sedation scores, and post-anesthesia care unit stay were comparable. TSA confirmed that the required information size for the primary outcome was reached, indicating statistical conclusiveness.

Conclusions: Remimazolam use is associated with significantly reduced PONV, rescue antiemetic use, and intraoperative hypotension compared to inhalational agents. TSA confirms the robustness of these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雷马唑仑和吸入麻醉对全身麻醉患者术后恢复的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:Remimazolam是一种超短效苯二氮卓类药物,其特点是起效快,恢复快,持续输注后积累最小。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估与吸入麻醉药相比,雷马唑仑是否能更好地恢复术后。方法:检索截至2024年8月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar、Scopus等数据库。纳入成年患者的随机对照试验(rct),比较雷马唑仑与挥发性药物。主要结局是术后24小时恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生率。次要结局包括抢救止吐药和镇痛药的使用、疼痛评分、术中低血压和其他术后恢复参数。采用试验序列分析(TSA)来验证主要结局的稳健性。结果:共分析了12项rct,共853例患者。与吸入性药物相比,雷马唑仑显著降低了PONV的发生率(相对危险度[RR] 0.51; 95%可信区间[CI] 0.27-0.96; I²= 43%;P = 0.04)和抢救止吐药的需求(RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10-0.89; I²= 0%;P = 0.03)。术后疼痛评分(标准化平均差-0.17;P = 0.11)和镇痛需求(RR 0.95; P = 0.82)无显著差异。雷马唑仑与术中低血压发生率显著降低相关(RR 0.58; P = 0.01)。拔管时间、镇静评分和麻醉后护理单位住院时间具有可比性。TSA确认,主要结果所需的信息大小已达到,表明统计结论。结论:与吸入性药物相比,雷马唑仑的使用与显著降低PONV、抢救止吐和术中低血压相关。运输安全管理局证实了这些发现的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书