[Interdisciplinary, research-based teaching format for participatory technology development in nursing: a mixed methods study].

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a001057
Pascal Müller, Alexander Thomas Linde, Mandy Weißbach, Wolf Zimmermann, Patrick Jahn, Karsten Schwarz, Elisa Haucke
{"title":"[Interdisciplinary, research-based teaching format for participatory technology development in nursing: a mixed methods study].","authors":"Pascal Müller, Alexander Thomas Linde, Mandy Weißbach, Wolf Zimmermann, Patrick Jahn, Karsten Schwarz, Elisa Haucke","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interdisciplinary, research-based teaching format for participatory technology development in nursing: a mixed methods study <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> Digital assistance technologies offer great potential to support and relieve the burden of care when they are tailored to the requirements of everyday care and developed in collaboration with users. <i>Aim:</i> The objective was to develop and pilot an interdisciplinary, research-oriented teaching format (IFL) to train students of computer science (bachelor's degree) and health and nursing sciences (master's degree) in robotics development, participatory research, and interdisciplinary collaboration. <i>Methods:</i> The twelve-month IFL was divided into an idea phase and a development phase with a focus on teaching participatory and interdisciplinary skills. A mixed methods design with pre-post surveys and focus group interviews was used for evaluation to assess the impact on collaboration and the conditions for success for such teaching formats. <i>Results:</i> The piloted IFL led to the development of a proof of concept for robotics-assisted wound documentation. While the attitude of computer science students toward interdisciplinary collaboration improved, a negative trend was observed among nursing students. Focus group interviews emphasized the importance of clear structures, curricular anchoring, and practical tasks for successful collaboration. <i>Conclusions:</i> Students are in favor of IFL with practical relevance to their future professional practice. Such teaching formats promote interdisciplinary collaboration as well as the personal and professional development of students.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interdisciplinary, research-based teaching format for participatory technology development in nursing: a mixed methods study Abstract: Background: Digital assistance technologies offer great potential to support and relieve the burden of care when they are tailored to the requirements of everyday care and developed in collaboration with users. Aim: The objective was to develop and pilot an interdisciplinary, research-oriented teaching format (IFL) to train students of computer science (bachelor's degree) and health and nursing sciences (master's degree) in robotics development, participatory research, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Methods: The twelve-month IFL was divided into an idea phase and a development phase with a focus on teaching participatory and interdisciplinary skills. A mixed methods design with pre-post surveys and focus group interviews was used for evaluation to assess the impact on collaboration and the conditions for success for such teaching formats. Results: The piloted IFL led to the development of a proof of concept for robotics-assisted wound documentation. While the attitude of computer science students toward interdisciplinary collaboration improved, a negative trend was observed among nursing students. Focus group interviews emphasized the importance of clear structures, curricular anchoring, and practical tasks for successful collaboration. Conclusions: Students are in favor of IFL with practical relevance to their future professional practice. Such teaching formats promote interdisciplinary collaboration as well as the personal and professional development of students.

[跨学科,研究型教学模式的参与式技术发展护理:混合方法研究]。
摘要:背景:当数字辅助技术根据日常护理需求量身定制并与用户合作开发时,它们在支持和减轻护理负担方面具有巨大潜力。目的:目标是开发和试行一种跨学科、以研究为导向的教学模式(IFL),以培养计算机科学(学士学位)和健康与护理科学(硕士学位)的学生在机器人开发、参与式研究和跨学科合作方面的能力。方法:为期12个月的IFL分为构思阶段和发展阶段,重点是教授参与性和跨学科技能。采用前后调查和焦点小组访谈的混合方法设计进行评估,以评估这种教学形式对合作的影响和成功的条件。结果:试点IFL导致了机器人辅助伤口记录的概念验证的发展。计算机科学专业学生对跨学科合作的态度有所改善,而护理专业学生对跨学科合作的态度则呈消极趋势。焦点小组访谈强调了清晰结构、课程锚定和实际任务对成功合作的重要性。结论:学生支持与未来专业实践相关的IFL。这样的教学模式促进了跨学科合作以及学生的个人和专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书