“Don't Complain”: Labor Anxiety, Racial Ideologies, and Moral Micromanagement in Rural South Carolina

IF 0.8 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sydney Pullen
{"title":"“Don't Complain”: Labor Anxiety, Racial Ideologies, and Moral Micromanagement in Rural South Carolina","authors":"Sydney Pullen","doi":"10.1111/awr.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>South Carolina's Black Belt counties are perennial targets of economic development programs. Economic development personnel focus on industrial recruitment and workforce development to remedy the economic woes of the region. They advertise an available, non-union workforce and free workforce training programs for industries considering locating in South Carolina. These training programs emphasize “soft skills,” a term used by employers, economic development personnel, and workforce development agencies to refer to traits or behaviors an employer desires in a worker, but that are not directly related to a specific job. This research situates the neoliberal turn towards “soft skills” in its historical context in the U.S. South. I draw on Clyde Woods' concept of “moral micromanagement” strategies to compare 20th-century industrial education and 21st-century soft skills training programs, demonstrating that soft skills training programs represent a continuity of racial ideologies and racialized labor regimes. Placing soft skills training within a longer history of moral micromanagement indicates that labor management practices associated with soft skills have as much to do with old ways of disciplining labor as new and highlights the co-constitution of labor anxiety and racial ideologies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43035,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology of Work Review","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology of Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.70015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

South Carolina's Black Belt counties are perennial targets of economic development programs. Economic development personnel focus on industrial recruitment and workforce development to remedy the economic woes of the region. They advertise an available, non-union workforce and free workforce training programs for industries considering locating in South Carolina. These training programs emphasize “soft skills,” a term used by employers, economic development personnel, and workforce development agencies to refer to traits or behaviors an employer desires in a worker, but that are not directly related to a specific job. This research situates the neoliberal turn towards “soft skills” in its historical context in the U.S. South. I draw on Clyde Woods' concept of “moral micromanagement” strategies to compare 20th-century industrial education and 21st-century soft skills training programs, demonstrating that soft skills training programs represent a continuity of racial ideologies and racialized labor regimes. Placing soft skills training within a longer history of moral micromanagement indicates that labor management practices associated with soft skills have as much to do with old ways of disciplining labor as new and highlights the co-constitution of labor anxiety and racial ideologies.

“不要抱怨”:南卡罗来纳农村的劳动焦虑、种族意识形态和道德微观管理
南卡罗来纳州的黑带县是经济发展计划的长期目标。经济发展人员的重点是产业招聘和劳动力发展,以弥补该地区的经济困境。他们为考虑在南卡罗来纳落户的企业提供可用的、非工会的劳动力和免费的劳动力培训项目。这些培训项目强调“软技能”,这是雇主、经济发展人员和劳动力发展机构使用的术语,指的是雇主希望员工具备的特质或行为,但与具体工作没有直接关系。本研究将新自由主义转向“软技能”置于其在美国南部的历史背景中。我借鉴了克莱德·伍兹的“道德微观管理”策略的概念,将20世纪的工业教育与21世纪的软技能培训项目进行了比较,证明了软技能培训项目代表了种族意识形态和种族化劳动制度的连续性。将软技能培训置于道德微观管理的较长历史中表明,与软技能相关的劳动管理实践与约束劳动的旧方法有同样多的关系,并突出了劳动焦虑和种族意识形态的共同构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书