Comparison of the Frosch approach and the supra-fibular head approach in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures combined with lateral column fractures.
{"title":"Comparison of the Frosch approach and the supra-fibular head approach in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures combined with lateral column fractures.","authors":"Lei Wang, Xiangyang Dai, Xuening Dai, Ding Yue, ChengPu Zhong, YaLi Wen, Jian Qin, Tangbo Yuan","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00888-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the indications and clinical effects of the Frosch approach versus the supra-fibular head approach in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures combined with lateral column fractures (PTPL) on the basis of the morphological classification of the posterolateral cortex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated between June 2018 and January 2024 for PTPL using either the Frosch approach (group A, n = 23) or the supra-fibular head approach (group B, n = 21). Fractures were classified according to the morphology of the posterolateral cortex into two types: intact cortex (type I, n = 24) and disrupted cortex (type II, n = 20). Patients with type I fractures were further divided into subtypes IA (Frosch, n = 12) and IB (supra-fibular head, n = 12), and those with type II fractures into IIA (Frosch, n = 11) and IIB (supra-fibular head, n = 9). Baseline characteristics and perioperative parameters were compared. Clinical effects was assessed using the Rasmussen radiological score, and knee function was evaluated using the Rasmussen functional score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operative time was significantly longer in group A than in group B (130.0 ± 19.1 versus 110.1 ± 13.7 min, P < 0.05). In the type I subtype, operative time was longer in IA than in IB (138.3 ± 19.5 versus 111.9 ± 17.4 min, P < 0.05). In the type II subtype, operative time was significantly longer in IIA compared with IIB (120.9 ± 14.5 versus 107.8 ± 6.7 min, P < 0.05). Rasmussen radiological scores were significantly higher in IIA than IIB (17.6 ± 1.2 versus 17.0 ± 0.9, P < 0.05); similarly, functional scores were higher in IIA than IIB (29.1 ± 1.8 versus 27.7 ± 1.7, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morphology-based classification of PTPL-according to the integrity of the posterolateral cortex-can provide valuable guidance for surgical decision-making. For fractures with cortical disruption, the Frosch approach offers superior reduction and enhanced stability. In contrast, for fractures with intact cortical continuity, the supra-fibular head approach is a less invasive and technically straightforward alternative with favorable clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12605937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00888-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the indications and clinical effects of the Frosch approach versus the supra-fibular head approach in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures combined with lateral column fractures (PTPL) on the basis of the morphological classification of the posterolateral cortex.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated between June 2018 and January 2024 for PTPL using either the Frosch approach (group A, n = 23) or the supra-fibular head approach (group B, n = 21). Fractures were classified according to the morphology of the posterolateral cortex into two types: intact cortex (type I, n = 24) and disrupted cortex (type II, n = 20). Patients with type I fractures were further divided into subtypes IA (Frosch, n = 12) and IB (supra-fibular head, n = 12), and those with type II fractures into IIA (Frosch, n = 11) and IIB (supra-fibular head, n = 9). Baseline characteristics and perioperative parameters were compared. Clinical effects was assessed using the Rasmussen radiological score, and knee function was evaluated using the Rasmussen functional score.
Results: The operative time was significantly longer in group A than in group B (130.0 ± 19.1 versus 110.1 ± 13.7 min, P < 0.05). In the type I subtype, operative time was longer in IA than in IB (138.3 ± 19.5 versus 111.9 ± 17.4 min, P < 0.05). In the type II subtype, operative time was significantly longer in IIA compared with IIB (120.9 ± 14.5 versus 107.8 ± 6.7 min, P < 0.05). Rasmussen radiological scores were significantly higher in IIA than IIB (17.6 ± 1.2 versus 17.0 ± 0.9, P < 0.05); similarly, functional scores were higher in IIA than IIB (29.1 ± 1.8 versus 27.7 ± 1.7, P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Morphology-based classification of PTPL-according to the integrity of the posterolateral cortex-can provide valuable guidance for surgical decision-making. For fractures with cortical disruption, the Frosch approach offers superior reduction and enhanced stability. In contrast, for fractures with intact cortical continuity, the supra-fibular head approach is a less invasive and technically straightforward alternative with favorable clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.