HAS THE AHLBÄCK CLASSIFICATION BEEN ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AND CITED?

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-11-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220253306e296115
Julio Cesar Gali, Igor Silva de Novais, Leonardo Altieri Carletti, Pedro Rinaldi Alves Cruz, Edie Benedito Caetano
{"title":"HAS THE AHLBÄCK CLASSIFICATION BEEN ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AND CITED?","authors":"Julio Cesar Gali, Igor Silva de Novais, Leonardo Altieri Carletti, Pedro Rinaldi Alves Cruz, Edie Benedito Caetano","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220253306e296115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The classification of knee osteoarthritis allows assessment of disease severity and may be useful in guiding treatment decisions. One of the most widely used systems for this purpose is the Ahlbäck classification. This study aimed to compare the original description of the Ahlbäck classification with how it has been reported and cited by other authors in subsequent publications. We conducted a search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles containing exclusively the terms \"knee\", \"osteoarthritis\", \"osteoarthrosis\", and \"Ahlbäck classification\". After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 64 articles remained. These articles were analyzed in two aspects: the description of the Ahlbäck classification (categorized as correct, partially correct, or incorrect) and the accuracy of the reference citation (correctly or incorrectly cited). Only 10 articles (15.6%) correctly described the Ahlbäck classification and cited the original source properly. In contrast, 37 publications (58.4%) contained errors both in the description of the classification and the citation. Conversely, 37 publications (58.4%) contained errors both in the description of the classification and in the bibliographic reference. The proportion of articles that accurately described and cited the Ahlbäck classification was markedly low, comprising only 15.6% of those included in this systematic review. <b><i>Level of Evidence III; Systematic Review</i></b> .</p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 6","pages":"e296115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12599822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253306e296115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The classification of knee osteoarthritis allows assessment of disease severity and may be useful in guiding treatment decisions. One of the most widely used systems for this purpose is the Ahlbäck classification. This study aimed to compare the original description of the Ahlbäck classification with how it has been reported and cited by other authors in subsequent publications. We conducted a search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles containing exclusively the terms "knee", "osteoarthritis", "osteoarthrosis", and "Ahlbäck classification". After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 64 articles remained. These articles were analyzed in two aspects: the description of the Ahlbäck classification (categorized as correct, partially correct, or incorrect) and the accuracy of the reference citation (correctly or incorrectly cited). Only 10 articles (15.6%) correctly described the Ahlbäck classification and cited the original source properly. In contrast, 37 publications (58.4%) contained errors both in the description of the classification and the citation. Conversely, 37 publications (58.4%) contained errors both in the description of the classification and in the bibliographic reference. The proportion of articles that accurately described and cited the Ahlbäck classification was markedly low, comprising only 15.6% of those included in this systematic review. Level of Evidence III; Systematic Review .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

ahlbÄck分类是否被准确地描述和引用?
膝关节骨性关节炎的分类可以评估疾病的严重程度,并可能对指导治疗决策有用。用于此目的的最广泛使用的系统之一是Ahlbäck分类。本研究旨在比较Ahlbäck分类的原始描述与其他作者在随后的出版物中报道和引用的方式。我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中搜索了只包含“knee”、“osteoarthritis”、“osteoarthrosis”和“Ahlbäck classification”的文章。在应用纳入和排除标准后,还剩下64篇文章。这些文章从两个方面进行分析:对Ahlbäck分类的描述(分为正确、部分正确或不正确)和参考文献引用的准确性(正确或错误引用)。只有10篇文章(15.6%)正确描述了Ahlbäck分类并正确引用了原始来源。相比之下,37篇(58.4%)出版物在分类描述和引文中都存在错误。相反,37份出版物(58.4%)在分类描述和书目参考中都存在错误。准确描述和引用Ahlbäck分类的文章比例明显较低,在本系统综述中仅占15.6%。证据等级III;系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书