Bridging the Gap Between Ethical Norms and Clinical Practice: A Quantitative Study of Medical Ethics Implementation in Moroccan Healthcare.

IF 1.6 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Hec Forum Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s10730-025-09570-9
Kamal El Haidoudi, Hamza Sekkat, Moundib Abdelghani, Abdelhaq Barbach, Abdellah Khallouqi
{"title":"Bridging the Gap Between Ethical Norms and Clinical Practice: A Quantitative Study of Medical Ethics Implementation in Moroccan Healthcare.","authors":"Kamal El Haidoudi, Hamza Sekkat, Moundib Abdelghani, Abdelhaq Barbach, Abdellah Khallouqi","doi":"10.1007/s10730-025-09570-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the existence of codified ethical standards in healthcare, their consistent application in clinical decision-making remains underexplored. This study quantitatively evaluates the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Moroccan healthcare professionals regarding medical ethics. Guided by a positivist epistemology and a hypothetico-deductive methodology, a validated questionnaire was administered to 200 practitioners from diverse medical backgrounds. Descriptive statistics revealed that 96% of respondents report disclosing medical errors, yet only 50% had formal exposure to medical ethics, and 51.5% were familiar with the national code of ethics. Correlation analysis indicated weak but positive associations between ethical training and disclosure practices (r ≈ 0.07). Multiple linear regression demonstrated that variables such as knowledge of ethics (β = 0.111) and training (β = 0.022) had modest, non-significant effects on ethical conduct (R² = 1.05%). Attitudinal factors, such as acceptance of placebo use (β = - 0.121, p = 0.094), showed marginal influence, while respect for patient autonomy and additional training did not significantly predict behavior. Sociodemographic variables (age, experience, rank) also lacked predictive power, though the main model constant (β ≈ 1.0, p < 0.001) suggests a generally strong ethical baseline. These findings show the importance of targeted ethics education and institutional reinforcement to strengthen ethical clinical behavior and promote transparency within the Moroccan healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":"247-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-025-09570-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the existence of codified ethical standards in healthcare, their consistent application in clinical decision-making remains underexplored. This study quantitatively evaluates the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Moroccan healthcare professionals regarding medical ethics. Guided by a positivist epistemology and a hypothetico-deductive methodology, a validated questionnaire was administered to 200 practitioners from diverse medical backgrounds. Descriptive statistics revealed that 96% of respondents report disclosing medical errors, yet only 50% had formal exposure to medical ethics, and 51.5% were familiar with the national code of ethics. Correlation analysis indicated weak but positive associations between ethical training and disclosure practices (r ≈ 0.07). Multiple linear regression demonstrated that variables such as knowledge of ethics (β = 0.111) and training (β = 0.022) had modest, non-significant effects on ethical conduct (R² = 1.05%). Attitudinal factors, such as acceptance of placebo use (β = - 0.121, p = 0.094), showed marginal influence, while respect for patient autonomy and additional training did not significantly predict behavior. Sociodemographic variables (age, experience, rank) also lacked predictive power, though the main model constant (β ≈ 1.0, p < 0.001) suggests a generally strong ethical baseline. These findings show the importance of targeted ethics education and institutional reinforcement to strengthen ethical clinical behavior and promote transparency within the Moroccan healthcare system.

弥合伦理规范和临床实践之间的差距:摩洛哥医疗保健中医学伦理实施的定量研究。
尽管在医疗保健中存在着成文的道德标准,但它们在临床决策中的一致应用仍未得到充分探索。这项研究定量评估了摩洛哥保健专业人员关于医学伦理的知识、态度和做法。在实证主义认识论和假设演绎方法论的指导下,对来自不同医学背景的200名从业人员进行了有效的问卷调查。描述性统计显示,96%的受访者报告披露了医疗差错,但只有50%的人正式接触过医学伦理,51.5%的人熟悉国家道德准则。相关分析表明,道德培训与信息披露实践之间存在微弱的正相关关系(r≈0.07)。多元线性回归表明,道德知识(β = 0.111)和培训(β = 0.022)等变量对道德行为有适度的、不显著的影响(R²= 1.05%)。态度因素,如接受安慰剂使用(β = - 0.121, p = 0.094),显示出边际影响,而尊重患者自主权和额外训练并不能显著预测行为。社会人口学变量(年龄、经验、等级)也缺乏预测能力,尽管主要模型常数(β≈1.0,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书