Antibiotic Route of Administration: Is Oral the New IV in Older Adults?

Q2 Medicine
Alice N Hemenway, Heather Zimmerman, Elias B Chahine
{"title":"Antibiotic Route of Administration: Is Oral the New IV in Older Adults?","authors":"Alice N Hemenway, Heather Zimmerman, Elias B Chahine","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2025.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Oral therapy is widely used to treat many infections. However, there is less consensus regarding the use of oral antibiotics for serious infections. <b>Objective</b> This review aims to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous and oral antibiotic treatments for osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia, with a particular emphasis on data pertaining to older adults. <b>Data Source</b> A list of RCTs comparing intravenous and oral antibiotics for these types of infections was compiled through a search of PubMed and EMBASE. <b>Data Synthesis</b> A total of 19 RCTs were identified, including nine for osteomyelitis, three for endocarditis, six for bacteremia, and one addressing both osteomyelitis and bacteremia. All trials reported no significant difference between intravenous and oral antibiotic treatments. The inclusion of older adults varied across infection types. For osteomyelitis, only three of the ten RCTs had a mean patient age of 60 years or older. For endocarditis, two of the three RCTs had a mean patient age of 60 years or older. Lastly, for bacteremia, four of the seven RCTs had a mean patient age of 60 years or older. <b>Discussion</b> All retrieved RCTs support the use of fully or partially oral antibiotic regimens for osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia. Although data support the use of oral antibiotics in older adults for all three infection types, the number of trials that included older adults varied. <b>Conclusions</b> Several RCTs support the use of fully or partially oral antibiotic regimens for osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia. Oral agents may be reasonable options for older adults, depending on an individual's benefit-to-risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"40 11","pages":"457-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2025.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Oral therapy is widely used to treat many infections. However, there is less consensus regarding the use of oral antibiotics for serious infections. Objective This review aims to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous and oral antibiotic treatments for osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia, with a particular emphasis on data pertaining to older adults. Data Source A list of RCTs comparing intravenous and oral antibiotics for these types of infections was compiled through a search of PubMed and EMBASE. Data Synthesis A total of 19 RCTs were identified, including nine for osteomyelitis, three for endocarditis, six for bacteremia, and one addressing both osteomyelitis and bacteremia. All trials reported no significant difference between intravenous and oral antibiotic treatments. The inclusion of older adults varied across infection types. For osteomyelitis, only three of the ten RCTs had a mean patient age of 60 years or older. For endocarditis, two of the three RCTs had a mean patient age of 60 years or older. Lastly, for bacteremia, four of the seven RCTs had a mean patient age of 60 years or older. Discussion All retrieved RCTs support the use of fully or partially oral antibiotic regimens for osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia. Although data support the use of oral antibiotics in older adults for all three infection types, the number of trials that included older adults varied. Conclusions Several RCTs support the use of fully or partially oral antibiotic regimens for osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia. Oral agents may be reasonable options for older adults, depending on an individual's benefit-to-risk assessment.

抗生素的给药途径:口服是老年人新的静脉注射吗?
口腔疗法被广泛用于治疗多种感染。然而,关于使用口服抗生素治疗严重感染的共识较少。本综述旨在评价随机对照试验(rct),比较静脉注射和口服抗生素治疗骨髓炎、心内膜炎和菌血症,特别强调与老年人有关的数据。通过检索PubMed和EMBASE,编制了一份比较静脉注射和口服抗生素治疗这些类型感染的随机对照试验清单。共纳入19项随机对照试验,其中9项针对骨髓炎,3项针对心内膜炎,6项针对菌血症,1项针对骨髓炎和菌血症。所有试验均报告静脉注射和口服抗生素治疗之间无显著差异。对老年人的研究因感染类型而异。对于骨髓炎,10个随机对照试验中只有3个患者的平均年龄在60岁或以上。对于心内膜炎,三个随机对照试验中有两个患者的平均年龄为60岁或以上。最后,对于菌血症,7个随机对照试验中有4个患者的平均年龄为60岁或以上。所有检索到的随机对照试验都支持使用完全或部分口服抗生素治疗骨髓炎、心内膜炎和菌血症。尽管数据支持老年人对所有三种感染类型使用口服抗生素,但纳入老年人的试验数量各不相同。结论:一些随机对照试验支持使用完全或部分口服抗生素治疗骨髓炎、心内膜炎和菌血症。口服药物可能是老年人的合理选择,这取决于个人的获益-风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书