Great Wall: A Generalized Dose Optimization Design for Drug Combination Trials Maximizing Survival Benefit.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yan Han, Yingjie Qiu, Yi Zhao, Isabella Wan, Lang Li, Suyu Liu, Yong Zang
{"title":"Great Wall: A Generalized Dose Optimization Design for Drug Combination Trials Maximizing Survival Benefit.","authors":"Yan Han, Yingjie Qiu, Yi Zhao, Isabella Wan, Lang Li, Suyu Liu, Yong Zang","doi":"10.1002/pst.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most phase I-II drug-combination trial designs assume that selecting the optimal dose combination based on early outcomes will also lead to maximum long-term survival benefits. However, this assumption is often violated in many clinical studies, generally due to high rates of relapse following the initial response. To address this problem, we propose the Great Wall design, a general dose optimization design for drug-combination trials. The Great Wall design employs a \"divide-and-conquer\" algorithm to address the issue of partial order of toxicity and uses early outcomes to eliminate dose combinations that are excessively toxic or less efficacious. It utilizes a dose randomization approach to construct a candidate set of the promising dose combinations balancing the toxicity and early efficacy outcomes. The patients assigned to the candidate set are followed to collect the survival outcomes and the final optimal dose combination is then selected to maximize the survival benefit. The simulation studies confirm the desirable operating characteristics of the Great Wall design under various clinical settings. R codes are also provided to facilitate the application. The Great Wall design is modular and practically useful in settings where investigators plan to follow patients long enough to assess survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 6","pages":"e70049"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most phase I-II drug-combination trial designs assume that selecting the optimal dose combination based on early outcomes will also lead to maximum long-term survival benefits. However, this assumption is often violated in many clinical studies, generally due to high rates of relapse following the initial response. To address this problem, we propose the Great Wall design, a general dose optimization design for drug-combination trials. The Great Wall design employs a "divide-and-conquer" algorithm to address the issue of partial order of toxicity and uses early outcomes to eliminate dose combinations that are excessively toxic or less efficacious. It utilizes a dose randomization approach to construct a candidate set of the promising dose combinations balancing the toxicity and early efficacy outcomes. The patients assigned to the candidate set are followed to collect the survival outcomes and the final optimal dose combination is then selected to maximize the survival benefit. The simulation studies confirm the desirable operating characteristics of the Great Wall design under various clinical settings. R codes are also provided to facilitate the application. The Great Wall design is modular and practically useful in settings where investigators plan to follow patients long enough to assess survival outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

长城:药物联合试验中最大生存效益的通用剂量优化设计。
大多数I-II期联合用药试验设计假设,根据早期结果选择最佳剂量组合也将带来最大的长期生存效益。然而,这一假设在许多临床研究中经常被违背,通常是由于初始反应后的复发率很高。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了长城设计,一种用于联合用药试验的通用剂量优化设计。长城设计采用“分而治之”算法来解决毒性的部分顺序问题,并使用早期结果来消除毒性过大或效果较差的剂量组合。它采用剂量随机化方法来构建一组有希望的剂量组合,以平衡毒性和早期疗效结果。将被分配到候选组的患者进行随访以收集生存结果,然后选择最终的最佳剂量组合以最大限度地提高生存效益。仿真研究证实了长城设计在各种临床环境下的理想运行特性。还提供了R代码以方便应用。长城设计是模块化的,在研究人员计划跟踪患者足够长的时间以评估生存结果的情况下,它实际上很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书