Impact of Comorbidities on Treatments and Outcomes of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2025-11-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/carj/5021789
Lisa Lim, Dylan Hansen, Jessica Fairley, Maryam Tabesh, Laura Ross, Nava Ferdowsi, Gene-Siew Ngian, Diane Apostolopoulos, Joanne Sahhar, Lauren V Host, Jennifer Walker, Gabor Major, Susanna Proudman, Wendy Stevens, Mandana Nikpour
{"title":"Impact of Comorbidities on Treatments and Outcomes of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.","authors":"Lisa Lim, Dylan Hansen, Jessica Fairley, Maryam Tabesh, Laura Ross, Nava Ferdowsi, Gene-Siew Ngian, Diane Apostolopoulos, Joanne Sahhar, Lauren V Host, Jennifer Walker, Gabor Major, Susanna Proudman, Wendy Stevens, Mandana Nikpour","doi":"10.1155/carj/5021789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Treatment recommendations for systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) have evolved from initial monotherapy to upfront combination therapy with agents, including endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostanoids. In the presence of comorbidities, such as heart and lung disease, some clinicians have favoured monotherapy due to concerns about worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch. We sought to evaluate whether comorbidity burden impacts prescribing practices, quality of life and survival in SSc-PAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed prospectively collected data from participants recruited to the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) between 2007 and 2024. Participants were included if they had PAH confirmed by right heart catheterisation. Data were collected on the presence of 12 comorbidities as defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and prescription of PAH therapies, at PAH diagnosis and each subsequent annual visit. High morbidity was defined as a CCI score ≥ 4. With regard to prescribing practices, subgroup analysis was performed on two groups. The cardiac comorbidity group included patients with a diagnosis of angina, acute myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure or hypertension. The pulmonary comorbidity group included those with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. An additional subgroup of patients with SSc-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) was compared to those without ILD. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2004 patients within the ASCS, 238 patients with SSc-PAH were included (11.8%). SSc-PAH patients had significantly higher CCI scores (3.0 vs. 2.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and were more likely to have a high morbidity index (30.3% vs. 18.6% <i>p</i> < 0.001). Within the cohort of SSc-PAH patients, there were no significant differences between high and low morbidity patients with regard to clinical characteristics, autoantibody profile or internal organ manifestation. There was no difference in use of PAH medications between SSc-PAH patients with a low and high morbidity, with similar proportions receiving combination, monotherapy and no therapy, <i>p</i>=0.10. This was also the case in a subgroup analysis of those with cardiac comorbidity, pulmonary comorbidity or SSc-ILD. When comparing SSc-PAH patients with high morbidity to those without using K-M survival analysis, there was higher all-cause mortality (<i>p</i>=0.05). Univariable survival analysis showed no significant survival difference between SSc-PAH patients with high and low comorbidity burden. Combination therapy for PAH was associated with better survival compared to monotherapy (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.84, <i>p</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large cohort of SSc-PAH patients, the choice of treatments did not appear to differ based on high comorbidity burden or coexisting pulmonary or cardiac comorbidity, with a majority of SSc-PAH patients receiving combination therapy. Receiving combination therapy, irrespective of comorbidity status, improved survival in our cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5021789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/carj/5021789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Treatment recommendations for systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) have evolved from initial monotherapy to upfront combination therapy with agents, including endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and prostanoids. In the presence of comorbidities, such as heart and lung disease, some clinicians have favoured monotherapy due to concerns about worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch. We sought to evaluate whether comorbidity burden impacts prescribing practices, quality of life and survival in SSc-PAH.

Methods: We analysed prospectively collected data from participants recruited to the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) between 2007 and 2024. Participants were included if they had PAH confirmed by right heart catheterisation. Data were collected on the presence of 12 comorbidities as defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and prescription of PAH therapies, at PAH diagnosis and each subsequent annual visit. High morbidity was defined as a CCI score ≥ 4. With regard to prescribing practices, subgroup analysis was performed on two groups. The cardiac comorbidity group included patients with a diagnosis of angina, acute myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure or hypertension. The pulmonary comorbidity group included those with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. An additional subgroup of patients with SSc-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) was compared to those without ILD. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox regression model.

Results: Among 2004 patients within the ASCS, 238 patients with SSc-PAH were included (11.8%). SSc-PAH patients had significantly higher CCI scores (3.0 vs. 2.0, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have a high morbidity index (30.3% vs. 18.6% p < 0.001). Within the cohort of SSc-PAH patients, there were no significant differences between high and low morbidity patients with regard to clinical characteristics, autoantibody profile or internal organ manifestation. There was no difference in use of PAH medications between SSc-PAH patients with a low and high morbidity, with similar proportions receiving combination, monotherapy and no therapy, p=0.10. This was also the case in a subgroup analysis of those with cardiac comorbidity, pulmonary comorbidity or SSc-ILD. When comparing SSc-PAH patients with high morbidity to those without using K-M survival analysis, there was higher all-cause mortality (p=0.05). Univariable survival analysis showed no significant survival difference between SSc-PAH patients with high and low comorbidity burden. Combination therapy for PAH was associated with better survival compared to monotherapy (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.84, p=0.003).

Conclusion: In this large cohort of SSc-PAH patients, the choice of treatments did not appear to differ based on high comorbidity burden or coexisting pulmonary or cardiac comorbidity, with a majority of SSc-PAH patients receiving combination therapy. Receiving combination therapy, irrespective of comorbidity status, improved survival in our cohort.

Abstract Image

合并症对系统性硬化症相关性肺动脉高压治疗和预后的影响。
目的:系统性硬化相关性肺动脉高压(SSc-PAH)的治疗建议已经从最初的单药治疗发展到前期联合治疗,包括内皮素受体拮抗剂、磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂和前列腺素。在存在合并症的情况下,如心脏和肺部疾病,一些临床医生由于担心通气灌注不匹配恶化而倾向于单一治疗。我们试图评估合并症负担是否影响SSc-PAH的处方实践、生活质量和生存。方法:我们前瞻性地分析了2007年至2024年间澳大利亚硬皮病队列研究(ASCS)招募的参与者的数据。如果参与者通过右心导管确认患有PAH,则纳入研究。根据查理森合并症指数(Charlson comoridity Index, CCI)和PAH治疗处方,在PAH诊断和随后的每次年度就诊时收集了12种合并症的数据。高发病率定义为CCI评分≥4。在处方实践方面,对两组进行亚组分析。心脏合并症组包括诊断为心绞痛、急性心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭或高血压的患者。肺部合并症组包括诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘的患者。另外一个亚组的患者有ssc相关的间质性肺疾病(ILD)与没有ILD的患者进行比较。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox回归模型进行评估。结果:2004例ASCS患者中,238例伴有SSc-PAH(11.8%)。SSc-PAH患者的CCI评分明显更高(3.0比2.0,p < 0.001),并且更有可能具有高发病率指数(30.3%比18.6% p < 0.001)。在SSc-PAH患者队列中,高、低发病率患者在临床特征、自身抗体谱或脏器表现方面无显著差异。低发病率和高发病率的SSc-PAH患者在PAH药物的使用上没有差异,接受联合治疗、单一治疗和不治疗的比例相似,p=0.10。在心脏合并症、肺部合并症或SSc-ILD患者的亚组分析中也是如此。将高发病率的SSc-PAH患者与未使用K-M生存分析的患者进行比较,全因死亡率更高(p=0.05)。单变量生存分析显示,伴有高、低合并症负担的SSc-PAH患者生存率无显著差异。与单药治疗相比,PAH联合治疗与更好的生存率相关(HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.84, p=0.003)。结论:在这个庞大的SSc-PAH患者队列中,治疗的选择似乎没有因高合并症负担或共存的肺或心脏合并症而有所不同,大多数SSc-PAH患者接受联合治疗。无论合并症状况如何,接受联合治疗均可提高本队列患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书