Clinical Utility of an RNA-based Gene Fusion Assay in Sarcoma for Diagnosis and Management: Experience in an Australian Laboratory.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s40291-025-00820-7
Adel Shahnam, Catherine Mitchell, Christopher R McEvoy, Owen W J Prall, Huiling Xu, Andrew P Fellowes, David Y Choong, Christopher M Angel, Christine Khoo, Jia-Min Pang, Cameron Snell, Chris Van Vliet, Stephen J Luen, Susie Bae, Anne Hamilton, Jayesh Desai, Stephen B Fox, Jeremy Lewin
{"title":"Clinical Utility of an RNA-based Gene Fusion Assay in Sarcoma for Diagnosis and Management: Experience in an Australian Laboratory.","authors":"Adel Shahnam, Catherine Mitchell, Christopher R McEvoy, Owen W J Prall, Huiling Xu, Andrew P Fellowes, David Y Choong, Christopher M Angel, Christine Khoo, Jia-Min Pang, Cameron Snell, Chris Van Vliet, Stephen J Luen, Susie Bae, Anne Hamilton, Jayesh Desai, Stephen B Fox, Jeremy Lewin","doi":"10.1007/s40291-025-00820-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcoma represents a diverse group of over 70 subtypes with overlapping morphological and immunophenotypic features, often leading to diagnostic uncertainty. Gene fusions are commonly associated with specific sarcoma subtypes and can aid in diagnosis and management. RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables sensitive detection of gene fusions, particularly in cases with limited tissue or ambiguous histopathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 124 patients with suspected sarcoma who underwent RNA-based NGS using the Illumina TruSight RNA Fusion Panel (TRFP) at a dedicated sarcoma centre between June 2020 and June 2023. The impact of fusion testing on diagnostic classification and treatment decisions was evaluated by expert pathologists and oncologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gene fusions were detected in 75 of 124 cases (60%). Fusion results confirmed the initial diagnosis in 58 cases (47%) and altered the diagnosis in 17 cases (14%). In 14 cases (11%), findings directly influenced clinical management, including treatment de-escalation (nine cases) and initiation of targeted or alternative therapies (five cases). A definitive diagnosis was achieved in 59% of cases with limited tissue (41 of 70), 48% with uncertain tumour differentiation (25 of 52), and 43% with inconclusive or failed prior molecular testing (ten of 23), underscoring the utility of RNA-based NGS in diagnostically complex scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RNA-based NGS fusion panels provide diagnostic and clinical utility in the evaluation of mesenchymal tumours. Their integration into routine diagnostic workflows improves diagnostic accuracy and informs personalised treatment decisions, especially in diagnostically complex or resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49797,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"137-148"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-025-00820-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sarcoma represents a diverse group of over 70 subtypes with overlapping morphological and immunophenotypic features, often leading to diagnostic uncertainty. Gene fusions are commonly associated with specific sarcoma subtypes and can aid in diagnosis and management. RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables sensitive detection of gene fusions, particularly in cases with limited tissue or ambiguous histopathology.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 124 patients with suspected sarcoma who underwent RNA-based NGS using the Illumina TruSight RNA Fusion Panel (TRFP) at a dedicated sarcoma centre between June 2020 and June 2023. The impact of fusion testing on diagnostic classification and treatment decisions was evaluated by expert pathologists and oncologists.

Results: Gene fusions were detected in 75 of 124 cases (60%). Fusion results confirmed the initial diagnosis in 58 cases (47%) and altered the diagnosis in 17 cases (14%). In 14 cases (11%), findings directly influenced clinical management, including treatment de-escalation (nine cases) and initiation of targeted or alternative therapies (five cases). A definitive diagnosis was achieved in 59% of cases with limited tissue (41 of 70), 48% with uncertain tumour differentiation (25 of 52), and 43% with inconclusive or failed prior molecular testing (ten of 23), underscoring the utility of RNA-based NGS in diagnostically complex scenarios.

Conclusions: RNA-based NGS fusion panels provide diagnostic and clinical utility in the evaluation of mesenchymal tumours. Their integration into routine diagnostic workflows improves diagnostic accuracy and informs personalised treatment decisions, especially in diagnostically complex or resource-limited settings.

基于rna的基因融合检测在肉瘤诊断和治疗中的临床应用:澳大利亚实验室的经验。
背景:肉瘤代表了70多种亚型,具有重叠的形态学和免疫表型特征,经常导致诊断的不确定性。基因融合通常与特定的肉瘤亚型相关,可以帮助诊断和治疗。基于rna的下一代测序(NGS)能够灵敏地检测基因融合,特别是在组织有限或组织病理学不明确的情况下。方法:我们在2020年6月至2023年6月期间在一个专门的肉瘤中心使用Illumina TruSight RNA融合面板(TRFP)对124例疑似肉瘤患者进行了基于RNA的NGS的回顾性研究。专家病理学家和肿瘤学家评估融合试验对诊断分类和治疗决策的影响。结果:124例患者中有75例(60%)检测到基因融合。融合结果证实了58例(47%)的初始诊断,改变了17例(14%)的诊断。在14例(11%)病例中,研究结果直接影响了临床管理,包括治疗降级(9例)和开始靶向或替代治疗(5例)。在组织有限的病例中,59%(70例中的41例)获得了明确的诊断,48%的肿瘤分化不确定(52例中的25例),43%的先前分子检测不确定或失败(23例中的10例),强调了基于rna的NGS在诊断复杂情况中的效用。结论:基于rna的NGS融合板在间质肿瘤的诊断和临床评估中具有实用价值。将其集成到常规诊断工作流程中可以提高诊断准确性,并为个性化治疗决策提供信息,特别是在诊断复杂或资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy welcomes current opinion articles on emerging or contentious issues, comprehensive narrative reviews, systematic reviews (as outlined by the PRISMA statement), original research articles (including short communications) and letters to the editor. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书