Evaluating the Clinical Learning Environment for Competency-based Postgraduate Education in a Low-Middle income Country: Trainee Perceptions using PHEEM Inventory.

Qamar Riaz, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Sadia Masood
{"title":"Evaluating the Clinical Learning Environment for Competency-based Postgraduate Education in a Low-Middle income Country: Trainee Perceptions using PHEEM Inventory.","authors":"Qamar Riaz, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Sadia Masood","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2025.105990.2140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical learning environment (CLE) is an important element of competency-based postgraduate medical education (CBME). Trainee perceptions of their CLE serve as a quality indicator of the teaching and learning taking place at the workplace. This study aimed to investigate the trainees' perceptions regarding their CLE and identify strengths and weaknesses to support CBME.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A universal sampling was employed for this cross-sectional survey. The electronic version of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) inventory was sent via email to all the trainees who were enrolled in all 35 residency programs at our university and consented to participate in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 347 (69.4%) residents responded; of them, 65.7% were females. The overall mean score was 107 (66.8%), suggesting a generally favorable opinion of the workplace, with room for improvement. Mean scores for the subscales of Autonomy, Teaching, and Social Support were 33.42±7.24 (more positive), 42±8.9 (moving in the right direction), and 27.9±6.2 (more pros than cons), respectively. There was no difference in the CLE perceptions based on gender. Overall and subscale scores differed significantly across residency programs, with the highest in Radiology (122.3±13.5) and the lowest in Surgical disciplines (95.47±19.0); and year of residency, with the highest in the first year (111.3±17.8) and the lowest in the final year (81.5±34.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluating the EE offers valuable insights into enhancing training quality by identifying both strengths and weaknesses, and prioritizing areas in any planned enhancements. The EE for the postgraduate training appears to be prepared for implementing CBME, with certain areas warranting improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"13 4","pages":"303-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12596387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.105990.2140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical learning environment (CLE) is an important element of competency-based postgraduate medical education (CBME). Trainee perceptions of their CLE serve as a quality indicator of the teaching and learning taking place at the workplace. This study aimed to investigate the trainees' perceptions regarding their CLE and identify strengths and weaknesses to support CBME.

Methods: A universal sampling was employed for this cross-sectional survey. The electronic version of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) inventory was sent via email to all the trainees who were enrolled in all 35 residency programs at our university and consented to participate in the study.

Results: A total of 347 (69.4%) residents responded; of them, 65.7% were females. The overall mean score was 107 (66.8%), suggesting a generally favorable opinion of the workplace, with room for improvement. Mean scores for the subscales of Autonomy, Teaching, and Social Support were 33.42±7.24 (more positive), 42±8.9 (moving in the right direction), and 27.9±6.2 (more pros than cons), respectively. There was no difference in the CLE perceptions based on gender. Overall and subscale scores differed significantly across residency programs, with the highest in Radiology (122.3±13.5) and the lowest in Surgical disciplines (95.47±19.0); and year of residency, with the highest in the first year (111.3±17.8) and the lowest in the final year (81.5±34.3).

Conclusion: Evaluating the EE offers valuable insights into enhancing training quality by identifying both strengths and weaknesses, and prioritizing areas in any planned enhancements. The EE for the postgraduate training appears to be prepared for implementing CBME, with certain areas warranting improvement.

评估中低收入国家以能力为基础的研究生教育的临床学习环境:使用PHEEM量表的实习生感知。
临床学习环境(CLE)是基于能力的研究生医学教育(CBME)的重要组成部分。学员对CLE的认知是工作场所教学和学习的质量指标。本研究旨在探讨学员对母语学习的认知,并找出优势与不足,以支持母语学习。方法:采用通用抽样进行横断面调查。研究生医院教育环境量表(PHEEM)电子版通过电子邮件发送给我校所有35个住院医师项目的所有实习生,并同意参加本研究。结果:共有347名居民回复,占69.4%;其中,女性占65.7%。总体平均得分为107分(66.8%),表明对工作场所的总体看法是良好的,但仍有改进的余地。自主、教学和社会支持三个分量表的平均得分分别为33.42±7.24(积极)、42±8.9(向正确方向发展)和27.9±6.2(赞成多于反对)。基于性别的CLE认知没有差异。住院医师项目的总体得分和亚量表得分差异显著,放射科最高(122.3±13.5),外科最低(95.47±19.0);住院时间方面,住院第一年最高(111.3±17.8),住院最后一年最低(81.5±34.3)。结论:通过识别优势和劣势,并在任何计划的改进中优先考虑领域,评估EE为提高培训质量提供了有价值的见解。研究生培训的EE似乎是为实施CBME而准备的,但某些领域有待改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书