Application of error-corrected sequencing technologies for in vivo regulatory mutagenicity assessment

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105985
Carole L. Yauk , Anthony M. Lynch , Vasily N. Dobrovolsky , Maik Schuler , Stephanie L. Smith-Roe , Devon Fitzgerald , Jake Higgins , Naveed Honarvar , Frank Le Curieux , Shoji Matsumura , Sheroy Minocherhomji , Leslie Recio , Jesse J. Salk , Kei-ichi Sugiyama , Takayoshi Suzuki , John W. Wills , Francesco Marchetti
{"title":"Application of error-corrected sequencing technologies for in vivo regulatory mutagenicity assessment","authors":"Carole L. Yauk ,&nbsp;Anthony M. Lynch ,&nbsp;Vasily N. Dobrovolsky ,&nbsp;Maik Schuler ,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Smith-Roe ,&nbsp;Devon Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Jake Higgins ,&nbsp;Naveed Honarvar ,&nbsp;Frank Le Curieux ,&nbsp;Shoji Matsumura ,&nbsp;Sheroy Minocherhomji ,&nbsp;Leslie Recio ,&nbsp;Jesse J. Salk ,&nbsp;Kei-ichi Sugiyama ,&nbsp;Takayoshi Suzuki ,&nbsp;John W. Wills ,&nbsp;Francesco Marchetti","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Error-corrected sequencing (ECS) is a transformative method for <em>in vivo</em> mutagenicity assessment, enabling direct, highly sensitive measurement of mutation frequency and spectrum. ECS addresses key limitations of the transgenic rodent (TGR) assay, including lack of integration into standard toxicity studies, restricted model availability, and limited alignment with the 3R principles. To support regulatory acceptance, an expert workgroup of the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) reviewed ECS technologies and developed consensus recommendations for its inclusion into Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines. The working group agreed that ECS: produces results that are concordant with validated TGR assays; can be incorporated into standard ≥28-day repeat-dose toxicity studies; and, data interpretation should be based on overall mutation frequency compared with concurrent vehicle controls. The working group emphasized harmonized data reporting aligned with OECD principles and endorsed study designs that enable quantitative risk assessment. Overall, the working group agreed that ECS offers a significant advancement over current mutagenicity assays by enabling the use of diverse models beyond conventional TGR systems described in OECD test guideline 488. The working group fully supports the application of ECS to generate <em>in vivo</em> mutagenicity data for regulatory submissions and recommends its inclusion in future OECD test guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105985"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027323002500217X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Error-corrected sequencing (ECS) is a transformative method for in vivo mutagenicity assessment, enabling direct, highly sensitive measurement of mutation frequency and spectrum. ECS addresses key limitations of the transgenic rodent (TGR) assay, including lack of integration into standard toxicity studies, restricted model availability, and limited alignment with the 3R principles. To support regulatory acceptance, an expert workgroup of the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) reviewed ECS technologies and developed consensus recommendations for its inclusion into Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines. The working group agreed that ECS: produces results that are concordant with validated TGR assays; can be incorporated into standard ≥28-day repeat-dose toxicity studies; and, data interpretation should be based on overall mutation frequency compared with concurrent vehicle controls. The working group emphasized harmonized data reporting aligned with OECD principles and endorsed study designs that enable quantitative risk assessment. Overall, the working group agreed that ECS offers a significant advancement over current mutagenicity assays by enabling the use of diverse models beyond conventional TGR systems described in OECD test guideline 488. The working group fully supports the application of ECS to generate in vivo mutagenicity data for regulatory submissions and recommends its inclusion in future OECD test guidelines.
纠错测序技术在体内调控致突变性评估中的应用。
错误校正测序(ECS)是体内突变性评估的一种变革性方法,可以直接、高灵敏度地测量突变频率和谱。ECS解决了转基因啮齿动物(TGR)试验的主要局限性,包括缺乏与标准毒性研究的整合,模型可用性受限,以及与3R原则的有限一致性。为了支持监管认可,国际遗传毒性测试研讨会(IWGT)的一个专家工作组审查了ECS技术,并制定了将其纳入经济合作与发展组织(OECD)测试指南的共识建议。工作组一致认为,ECS产生的结果与经过验证的TGR分析一致;可纳入标准≥28天重复给药毒性研究;并且,数据解释应基于与同时进行的载体对照相比的总体突变频率。工作组强调了符合经合组织原则的统一数据报告,并认可了能够进行定量风险评估的研究设计。总体而言,工作组一致认为,ECS通过使用不同的模型,超越OECD测试指南488中描述的传统TGR系统,为当前的致突变性分析提供了重大进步。工作组完全支持将ECS应用于生成体内诱变性数据以提交监管机构,并建议将其纳入未来的经合组织测试指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书