Pharmacokinetics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Patients With Partial- and Full-Thickness Skin Burns.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1002/phar.70076
Ronald G Hall, Levi Hooper, Sharmila Dissanaike, John A Griswold, Raja Reddy Kallem, Indhumathy Subramaniyan, William C Putnam, Manjunath P Pai
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Patients With Partial- and Full-Thickness Skin Burns.","authors":"Ronald G Hall, Levi Hooper, Sharmila Dissanaike, John A Griswold, Raja Reddy Kallem, Indhumathy Subramaniyan, William C Putnam, Manjunath P Pai","doi":"10.1002/phar.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with burns are at an increased risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and may need specialized dosing regimens due to alterations in physiology due to their injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Therefore, we conducted a single-dose, open-label, pharmacokinetic study of ceftolozane (2 g)/tazobactam (1 g) infused over 60 min in six patients with partial- or full-thickness burns and central line access. Serial blood samples were obtained at the following time points: 0 (predose) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h following the start of infusion for determination of plasma drug concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar estimates of clearance (CL) were observed between the groups, and as a consequence the half-life (T1/2) was longer in the six patients with burns in the current study compared to previous studies of healthy volunteers on average. Although these mean comparisons suggest similarity in exposure based on area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax), it is important to recognize that the interindividual variability is approximately 2- to 5-fold higher in patients with burns compared to healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find sufficient deviations in the concentrations of ceftolozane/tazobactam to recommend an empiric dose adjustment for patients with burns. However, this finding is limited by our small sample size and lack of clinical outcome data. Therefore, we also provide a conditional recommendation to conduct therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing or to switch to a continuous infusion approach in cases of a suboptimal clinical response.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"774-779"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with burns are at an increased risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and may need specialized dosing regimens due to alterations in physiology due to their injuries.

Methods: Therefore, we conducted a single-dose, open-label, pharmacokinetic study of ceftolozane (2 g)/tazobactam (1 g) infused over 60 min in six patients with partial- or full-thickness burns and central line access. Serial blood samples were obtained at the following time points: 0 (predose) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h following the start of infusion for determination of plasma drug concentrations.

Results: Similar estimates of clearance (CL) were observed between the groups, and as a consequence the half-life (T1/2) was longer in the six patients with burns in the current study compared to previous studies of healthy volunteers on average. Although these mean comparisons suggest similarity in exposure based on area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax), it is important to recognize that the interindividual variability is approximately 2- to 5-fold higher in patients with burns compared to healthy volunteers.

Conclusions: We did not find sufficient deviations in the concentrations of ceftolozane/tazobactam to recommend an empiric dose adjustment for patients with burns. However, this finding is limited by our small sample size and lack of clinical outcome data. Therefore, we also provide a conditional recommendation to conduct therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing or to switch to a continuous infusion approach in cases of a suboptimal clinical response.

头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦在部分和全层皮肤烧伤患者中的药代动力学。
引言:烧伤患者感染包括铜绿假单胞菌在内的多药耐药病原体的风险增加,由于受伤导致的生理改变,可能需要专门的给药方案。方法:因此,我们对6例部分或全层烧伤患者进行了一项单剂量、开放标签的药代动力学研究,其中头孢唑氮(2g)/他唑巴坦(1g)输注超过60分钟。在给药前0和给药后0.5、1、1.5、2、2.5、3、4、6、8、12、16、24 h连续取血,测定血浆药物浓度。结果:两组之间观察到相似的清除率(CL)估计值,因此本研究中6例烧伤患者的半衰期(T1/2)比以往对健康志愿者的平均研究更长。虽然这些平均比较表明基于曲线下面积(AUC)和最大浓度(Cmax)的暴露相似,但重要的是要认识到烧伤患者的个体间变异性比健康志愿者高约2- 5倍。结论:我们没有发现头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦浓度的足够偏差,以推荐烧伤患者的经验剂量调整。然而,这一发现受到样本量小和缺乏临床结果数据的限制。因此,我们也有条件地建议进行治疗药物监测,以调整头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦的剂量,或者在临床反应不理想的情况下切换到持续输注方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书