Retro- and prospective histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of safety margins following complete excision of less than 1 mm melanomas.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Melanoma Research Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI:10.1097/CMR.0000000000001070
Amandine Bouillenne, Pascale Quatresooz, Patrick Collins, Arjen F Nikkels
{"title":"Retro- and prospective histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of safety margins following complete excision of less than 1 mm melanomas.","authors":"Amandine Bouillenne, Pascale Quatresooz, Patrick Collins, Arjen F Nikkels","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reexcisions for melanoma do rarely present residual melanoma. To analyze the number of positive margins in reexcisions of in situ and <1 mm melanomas. To see whether the immunohistochemical (IHC) panel (Preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME), Sry-related HMg-Box gene 10 (SOX 10), Human melanoma black 45 (HMB45), and Melan A) detected additional cases of melanoma. Three pilot cohorts (retrospective, prospective, and direct safety margins) were analyzed on the persistence of melanoma in reexcisions. Among the 97 cases of the retrospective cohort (27 in situ and 69 invasive melanomas), one residual in situ melanoma was detected in the reexcisions. In the second cohort, among 81 cases (18 in situ and 63 invasive melanomas), two cases (2.5%) presented in situ melanoma. In the group where direct margins were taken ( n  = 21) 2 (9.5%) in situ melanoma were evidenced in the margins. The IHC panel was needed to confirm three additional in situ melanomas in cohort 2. In a total of 178 cases (97 + 81) of reexcision, three and five cases (1.7 and 3.4%) of in situ melanoma were evidenced after H/E and IHC, respectively. These pilot data could question the usefulness of reexcision in <1 mm melanomas, particularly as only cases of in situ melanoma were detected. Larges prospective series would be required to answer this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":" ","pages":"54-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12736408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reexcisions for melanoma do rarely present residual melanoma. To analyze the number of positive margins in reexcisions of in situ and <1 mm melanomas. To see whether the immunohistochemical (IHC) panel (Preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME), Sry-related HMg-Box gene 10 (SOX 10), Human melanoma black 45 (HMB45), and Melan A) detected additional cases of melanoma. Three pilot cohorts (retrospective, prospective, and direct safety margins) were analyzed on the persistence of melanoma in reexcisions. Among the 97 cases of the retrospective cohort (27 in situ and 69 invasive melanomas), one residual in situ melanoma was detected in the reexcisions. In the second cohort, among 81 cases (18 in situ and 63 invasive melanomas), two cases (2.5%) presented in situ melanoma. In the group where direct margins were taken ( n  = 21) 2 (9.5%) in situ melanoma were evidenced in the margins. The IHC panel was needed to confirm three additional in situ melanomas in cohort 2. In a total of 178 cases (97 + 81) of reexcision, three and five cases (1.7 and 3.4%) of in situ melanoma were evidenced after H/E and IHC, respectively. These pilot data could question the usefulness of reexcision in <1 mm melanomas, particularly as only cases of in situ melanoma were detected. Larges prospective series would be required to answer this issue.

Abstract Image

完全切除小于1mm的黑色素瘤后的安全边缘的回顾性和前瞻性组织学和免疫组织化学分析。
黑色素瘤的再切除很少有残留的黑色素瘤。目的:分析原位和原位肿瘤再切除中阳性切缘的数量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Melanoma Research
Melanoma Research 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Melanoma Research is a well established international forum for the dissemination of new findings relating to melanoma. The aim of the Journal is to promote the level of informational exchange between those engaged in the field. Melanoma Research aims to encourage an informed and balanced view of experimental and clinical research and extend and stimulate communication and exchange of knowledge between investigators with differing areas of expertise. This will foster the development of translational research. The reporting of new clinical results and the effect and toxicity of new therapeutic agents and immunotherapy will be given emphasis by rapid publication of Short Communications. ​Thus, Melanoma Research seeks to present a coherent and up-to-date account of all aspects of investigations pertinent to melanoma. Consequently the scope of the Journal is broad, embracing the entire range of studies from fundamental and applied research in such subject areas as genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, photobiology, pathology, immunology, and advances in clinical oncology influencing the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书