Comparison of Knee Flexion Angles for Maintaining Dynamic Balance on Negative Slopes: A Guide for Improving Postural Stability in Mountain Climbing and Downhill Walking

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maryam Hajian MD , Shahram Mohaghegh MD
{"title":"Comparison of Knee Flexion Angles for Maintaining Dynamic Balance on Negative Slopes: A Guide for Improving Postural Stability in Mountain Climbing and Downhill Walking","authors":"Maryam Hajian MD ,&nbsp;Shahram Mohaghegh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.10.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic balance at different knee flexion angles (maximal knee flexion angles of 30° and 45°) on a 20% negative slope.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In an observational cross-sectional study, 19 healthy male participants performed a modified Star Excursion Balance Test on a 20% negative slope, whereas the left standing knee was restricted by a knee brace in a maximum of 30° or 45° flexion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The balance scores were significantly better in 45° knee flexion compared with 30° flexion in the composite reach and also in the percentage of reach in any of the test directions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>On a 20% negative slope, 45° knee flexion resulted in better dynamic balance than 30° knee flexion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 656-661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475425000892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic balance at different knee flexion angles (maximal knee flexion angles of 30° and 45°) on a 20% negative slope.

Methods

In an observational cross-sectional study, 19 healthy male participants performed a modified Star Excursion Balance Test on a 20% negative slope, whereas the left standing knee was restricted by a knee brace in a maximum of 30° or 45° flexion.

Results

The balance scores were significantly better in 45° knee flexion compared with 30° flexion in the composite reach and also in the percentage of reach in any of the test directions.

Conclusion

On a 20% negative slope, 45° knee flexion resulted in better dynamic balance than 30° knee flexion.
在负坡上保持动态平衡时膝关节屈曲角度的比较:提高登山和下坡行走姿势稳定性的指导。
目的:本研究的目的是比较在20%负坡度上不同膝关节屈曲角度(最大膝关节屈曲角度为30°和45°)的动态平衡。方法:在一项观察性横断面研究中,19名健康男性参与者在20%的负斜度上进行了改良的星偏移平衡测试,而左站立膝盖被膝盖支架限制在最大30°或45°屈曲。结果:在45°膝关节屈曲中,平衡分数明显优于30°膝关节复合屈曲,并且在任何测试方向的屈曲百分比中也是如此。结论:在负坡度为20%时,45°膝关节屈曲比30°膝关节屈曲的动态平衡效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书