Comparison of Knee Flexion Angles for Maintaining Dynamic Balance on Negative Slopes: A Guide for Improving Postural Stability in Mountain Climbing and Downhill Walking
{"title":"Comparison of Knee Flexion Angles for Maintaining Dynamic Balance on Negative Slopes: A Guide for Improving Postural Stability in Mountain Climbing and Downhill Walking","authors":"Maryam Hajian MD , Shahram Mohaghegh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.10.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic balance at different knee flexion angles (maximal knee flexion angles of 30° and 45°) on a 20% negative slope.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In an observational cross-sectional study, 19 healthy male participants performed a modified Star Excursion Balance Test on a 20% negative slope, whereas the left standing knee was restricted by a knee brace in a maximum of 30° or 45° flexion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The balance scores were significantly better in 45° knee flexion compared with 30° flexion in the composite reach and also in the percentage of reach in any of the test directions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>On a 20% negative slope, 45° knee flexion resulted in better dynamic balance than 30° knee flexion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 656-661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475425000892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic balance at different knee flexion angles (maximal knee flexion angles of 30° and 45°) on a 20% negative slope.
Methods
In an observational cross-sectional study, 19 healthy male participants performed a modified Star Excursion Balance Test on a 20% negative slope, whereas the left standing knee was restricted by a knee brace in a maximum of 30° or 45° flexion.
Results
The balance scores were significantly better in 45° knee flexion compared with 30° flexion in the composite reach and also in the percentage of reach in any of the test directions.
Conclusion
On a 20% negative slope, 45° knee flexion resulted in better dynamic balance than 30° knee flexion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world.
The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.