Forces Recorded in Manual Therapy Techniques Applied to a Mannequin Simulating A 3- to 4-Month-Old Infant

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Braden G. Keil BAppSc (Chiropractic), MChiroSc (Paediatrics), FICC, FACCP, Christian J. Fludder BChiroSc, MChiropractic, DACCP
{"title":"Forces Recorded in Manual Therapy Techniques Applied to a Mannequin Simulating A 3- to 4-Month-Old Infant","authors":"Braden G. Keil BAppSc (Chiropractic), MChiroSc (Paediatrics), FICC, FACCP,&nbsp;Christian J. Fludder BChiroSc, MChiropractic, DACCP","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to record preload force, peak force, and time from preload to peak force used with 4 manipulation techniques in a simulated 3- to 4-month-old infant.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The project recorded 4 scenarios involving spinal manipulation applied to a mannequin comparable with a 3- to 4-month-old infant by 2 postgraduate trained and experienced practitioners and educators in pediatric spinal manipulation and mobilization. Results for preload force, peak force, time to peak, and rate of force application were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preload force was less than 10 N in the majority of scenarios. Average peak force in 3 cervical spine scenarios ranged from 35.2 to 79.9 N. Sacral data recorded an average peak force of 34.9 to 41.2 N with a standard distribution of 3.6 to 7.1 N. The time to peak force recorded for the 4 scenarios were under 110 ms. The rate of force production for all but 1 scenario was in excess of 300 N/s. Intrapractitioner data analysis demonstrated peak forces were not significantly different across 3 scenarios, with interpractitioner data not significantly different across 2 scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Average peak forces recorded were similar to those previously reported. Time to peak recordings were typically under 100 ms and rate of force application above 300 N/s; within the optimal range for muscle spindle receptor and Golgi tendon organ activation. Further research into forces used across the pediatric age ranges is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 689-697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475425000296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to record preload force, peak force, and time from preload to peak force used with 4 manipulation techniques in a simulated 3- to 4-month-old infant.

Methods

The project recorded 4 scenarios involving spinal manipulation applied to a mannequin comparable with a 3- to 4-month-old infant by 2 postgraduate trained and experienced practitioners and educators in pediatric spinal manipulation and mobilization. Results for preload force, peak force, time to peak, and rate of force application were determined.

Results

Preload force was less than 10 N in the majority of scenarios. Average peak force in 3 cervical spine scenarios ranged from 35.2 to 79.9 N. Sacral data recorded an average peak force of 34.9 to 41.2 N with a standard distribution of 3.6 to 7.1 N. The time to peak force recorded for the 4 scenarios were under 110 ms. The rate of force production for all but 1 scenario was in excess of 300 N/s. Intrapractitioner data analysis demonstrated peak forces were not significantly different across 3 scenarios, with interpractitioner data not significantly different across 2 scenarios.

Conclusion

Average peak forces recorded were similar to those previously reported. Time to peak recordings were typically under 100 ms and rate of force application above 300 N/s; within the optimal range for muscle spindle receptor and Golgi tendon organ activation. Further research into forces used across the pediatric age ranges is needed.
应用于模拟3- 4个月婴儿的人体模型的手动治疗技术记录的力。
目的:本研究的目的是记录4种手法在模拟3- 4个月婴儿中使用的预紧力、峰值力以及从预紧力到峰值力的时间。方法:该项目记录了4个场景,包括由2名经过研究生培训和经验丰富的儿科脊柱操作和动员从业人员和教育者应用于与3至4个月婴儿相当的人体模型。确定了预紧力、峰值力、达到峰值时间和施力率的结果。结果:在大多数情况下,预紧力小于10 N。3种颈椎情况的平均峰值力范围为35.2至79.9 N,骶骨数据记录的平均峰值力为34.9至41.2 N,标准分布为3.6至7.1 N, 4种情况记录的峰值力时间均在110 ms以下。除1种情景外,所有情景的产力速率都超过300 N/s。从业人员内部数据分析表明,峰值力在3种情况下没有显著差异,从业人员之间的数据在2种情况下没有显著差异。结论:记录的平均峰值力与先前报道的相似。峰值记录时间通常在100毫秒以下,施力率高于300 N/s;在肌梭体受体和高尔基肌腱器官激活的最佳范围内。需要对儿童年龄段使用的力量进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书