{"title":"Diabetes management dilemma: association between glycated hemoglobin levels and mortality risk in diabetic patients.","authors":"Junwen Wang, Yuyang Ye, Xuefeng Chen, Xinru Hu, Yong Shi, Yuanning Xu, Yong Peng","doi":"10.21037/cdt-2025-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between improved glycemic control and mortality reduction in diabetes remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the temporal trends and association between haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control status and mortality risk among adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 1999 and 2014. The statistical significance of linear or nonlinear trends was evaluated using logistic regression. Nonlinear temporal trends were evaluated by including quadratic terms for time in the regression models. To explore the relationships between HbA1c and mortality, the study employed the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis, along with Kaplan-Meier survival curves for univariate visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With 6,516 participants, the study showed a significant improvement in the control rate of HbA1c among diabetic patients, increasing from 41.61% in 1999 to 58.72% in 2014 (P<0.001). However, there was no noticeable trend in the overall all-cause mortality rate, which was 10.79% in 1999 and 12.08% in 2014 (P=0.608), or in cardiovascular mortality, which was 4.74% in 1999 and 4.24% in 2014 (P=0.371), among diabetic patients. No significant differences were found in the risks of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-1.13; P=0.13] or cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.41-3.02; P=0.84) between patients with HbA1c below 7.0% and those with HbA1c 7.0% or higher. Interestingly, the rate of sulfonylureas use went down from 30.25% in 1999 to 12.42% in 2014 (linear P value <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite significant improvements in HbA1c control rates among US adults with diabetes from 1999 to 2014, we observed no corresponding reduction in 5-year mortality risks. Achieving HbA1c <7.0% was not associated with lower mortality risk in this population. These findings suggest that improvements in glycemic control alone may be insufficient to reduce mortality in diabetic populations, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach to diabetes management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9592,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","volume":"15 5","pages":"1045-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12596443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-2025-59","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The relationship between improved glycemic control and mortality reduction in diabetes remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the temporal trends and association between haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control status and mortality risk among adults with diabetes.
Methods: This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 1999 and 2014. The statistical significance of linear or nonlinear trends was evaluated using logistic regression. Nonlinear temporal trends were evaluated by including quadratic terms for time in the regression models. To explore the relationships between HbA1c and mortality, the study employed the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis, along with Kaplan-Meier survival curves for univariate visualization.
Results: With 6,516 participants, the study showed a significant improvement in the control rate of HbA1c among diabetic patients, increasing from 41.61% in 1999 to 58.72% in 2014 (P<0.001). However, there was no noticeable trend in the overall all-cause mortality rate, which was 10.79% in 1999 and 12.08% in 2014 (P=0.608), or in cardiovascular mortality, which was 4.74% in 1999 and 4.24% in 2014 (P=0.371), among diabetic patients. No significant differences were found in the risks of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-1.13; P=0.13] or cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.41-3.02; P=0.84) between patients with HbA1c below 7.0% and those with HbA1c 7.0% or higher. Interestingly, the rate of sulfonylureas use went down from 30.25% in 1999 to 12.42% in 2014 (linear P value <0.001).
Conclusions: Despite significant improvements in HbA1c control rates among US adults with diabetes from 1999 to 2014, we observed no corresponding reduction in 5-year mortality risks. Achieving HbA1c <7.0% was not associated with lower mortality risk in this population. These findings suggest that improvements in glycemic control alone may be insufficient to reduce mortality in diabetic populations, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach to diabetes management.
期刊介绍:
The journal ''Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy'' (Print ISSN: 2223-3652; Online ISSN: 2223-3660) accepts basic and clinical science submissions related to Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. The mission of the journal is the rapid exchange of scientific information between clinicians and scientists worldwide. To reach this goal, the journal will focus on novel media, using a web-based, digital format in addition to traditional print-version. This includes on-line submission, review, publication, and distribution. The digital format will also allow submission of extensive supporting visual material, both images and video. The website www.thecdt.org will serve as the central hub and also allow posting of comments and on-line discussion. The web-site of the journal will be linked to a number of international web-sites (e.g. www.dxy.cn), which will significantly expand the distribution of its contents.